SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.87 issue214Estimation of Safety Performance Functions (SPF) at signalized intersections in Medellín, ColombiaMiSCi Middleware for smart cities extended with linked data author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


DYNA

Print version ISSN 0012-7353On-line version ISSN 2346-2183

Dyna rev.fac.nac.minas vol.87 no.214 Medellín July/Sept. 2020  Epub Oct 30, 2020

https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n214.83318 

Articles

Nitrogen transformation stages into ammonia in broiler production: sources, deposition, transformation, and emission into the environment

Etapas de transformación de nitrógeno en amoníaco en producción de pollos de engorde: fuentes, deposición, transformación, y emisión al medio ambiente

Monique de Oliveira Vilelaa 

Richard S. Gatesb 

Cecília F. Souzaa 

Carlos G. S. Teles Juniora 

Fernanda C. Sousaa 

aDepartment of Agricultural Engineering of Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil, monique.vilela@ufv.br, cfsouza@ufv.br, carlos.teles@ufv.br, fernanda.sousa@ufv.br

bDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, and Animal Science, Egg Industry Center, Iowa State University, Ames, USA. rsgates@iastate.edu


Abstract

Air quality is a major factor in intensive livestock management because air is the main vehicle for the dissemination of physical, chemical, and biological agents that affect the health and welfare of animals and humans. Ammonia is the main gaseous pollutant generated in poultry production. In this study, a literature review was conducted to highlight each nitrogen transformation stage during poultry production, while explaining the conversion mechanisms from the ingestion of crude protein to nitrogen volatilization into the atmosphere as ammonia gas. In summary, the steps for the synthesis of uric acid and the excretion of poultry, mineralization of nitrogen present in excreta, and volatilization of ammonia from litter are presented. Based on this review, the importance of understanding the sources and processes involved in ammonia generation and emission in poultry production is clear, thereby allowing the adoption of assertive measures that could minimize negative effects caused by ammonia emission.

Keywords: air pollution; air quality; nitrate; nitrite; poultry farming

Resumen

La calidad del aire es un factor importante en la ganadería intensiva, ya que el aire es el principal vehículo para la difusión de agentes físicos, químicos y biológicos que afectan la salud y el bienestar de los animales y los humanos. El amoníaco es el principal gas contaminante generado en la producción avícola. En este estudio, se realizó una revisión de la literatura con el fin de resaltar cada etapa de transformación de nitrógeno en la producción avícola, explicando los mecanismos de conversión desde la ingestión de proteína cruda hasta la volatilización en la atmósfera como gas de amoníaco. En resumen, estos pasos son: síntesis de ácido úrico y excreción por las aves de corral; mineralización de nitrógeno presente en excretas; volatilización de amoniaco de la basura. De esta revisión, queda claro la importancia de conocer las fuentes y los procesos involucrados en la generación y emisión de amoníaco en las aves de corral y, por lo tanto, adoptar medidas asertivas que puedan minimizar los impactos negativos causados por la emisión de amoníaco.

Palabras clave: avicultura; calidad del aire; nitrato; nitrito; polución del aire

1. Introduction

Brazil is currently the second-largest producer of chicken meat worldwide, reaching 13.05 million tons in 2017 and being surpassed only by the United States, which produced approximately 18.5 million tons [1]. According to previous research [1], 66.9% of Brazilian chicken meat production was destined for the domestic market, reflecting a per capita consumption of 42 kg habitant-1 year-1 in 2017.

The production of broiler chickens generates, directly or indirectly, a large amount of pollutants at all stages in the production chain, from the cultivation of grain for animal feed to the generation of residues, such as manure, litter, dead animals, and slaughterhouse effluents [2]. Such residues contain significant amounts of nutrients, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, copper, and zinc, as well as a high bacterial count [3] that affects the degradation of these elements, generating environmentally harmful compounds. In the broiler productive cycle, ammonia is the main gas generated, being present at higher concentrations compared to that of other gases. Therefore, it is of concern among producers and researchers. In addition to ammonia being a toxic gas to humans and animals when at high concentrations, it also causes negative impacts on the environment [4] by acting as a greenhouse gas [5].

The main source of ammonia production in broiler houses is the nitrogen found in urea, uric acid, and protein. These proteins are present in the undigested portion of excreta and are derived from amino acid-rich diets that ensure that the nutritional needs of the birds are met [6,7]. In general, many factors influence the concentration of ammonia inside poultry houses, such as housing density, nutrition, waste management, ventilation, temperature, and relative humidity of the air and near the floor [8,9]. Ventilation is one of the most important actions in the control of the ammonia concentration in these facilities. In addition to reducing climatic effects, ventilation is required to remove excess moisture from the air and litter. Consequently, it allows the air to be renewed by removing the toxic gases generated in the facility [10].

The poultry farming environment is a determining factor in the success of the production, given the climatic conditions and air quality. Therefore, it is essential to study the origin and trajectory of nitrogen during broiler rearing. By understanding the entire production system, it could be possible to develop mitigating measures to minimize ammonia emission and its impacts on the environment. Thus, it would be possible to ensure that productivity levels, animal welfare, and sustainability of activity are maintained.

The objective of this literature review was to address aspects related to the origin, percentages, retention forms, and disposition of nitrogen in broiler houses. Overall, the objective was to determine the stages of ammonia transformation in the microenvironment, from the source material to gas generation.

2. The nitrogen cycle

Nitrogen is one of the most important elements on earth because it is essential in amino acid and protein composition, which act in enzyme formation, tissue building, antibody formation, and hormone production, among other processes. It represents 78% of the volume of the earth's atmosphere. Its name is derived from the Greek “nitrogenium,” and it is also known as “azoto,” which in Greek means "lifeless" because of its inertia [11,12]. However, despite its abundance in the atmosphere, the amount of nitrogen in the earth's crust is relatively low, being approximately 19 ppm [12]. Only 0.02% is available for use by vegetables [13].

Because of its low reactivity, most life is unable to utilize molecular nitrogen (N2). A large amount of energy is required to break its triple bond. Therefore, molecular nitrogen must be converted to a more reactive compound, such as ammonia, ammonium, or nitrate. This conversion is accomplished through the fixation of atmospheric nitrogen, which is the process by which atmospheric nitrogen gas is aggregated with nitrogenous organic compounds and is thereby included in the nitrogen cycle [13].

Nitrification, denitrification, nitric oxide formation, nitrate leaching, and ammonia volatilization (NH3) processes are possible transformation routes for nitrogen molecules [7]. According to one study [14], the nitrogen cycle involves several stages, which, overall, can include:

  • Fixation: The process by which atmospheric inert nitrogen becomes available to living organisms (plants and animals) by becoming fixed in tissues of other living or dead organisms. Leguminous plants and some bacteria can fix nitrogen directly from the air. Bacteria are responsible for this process, resulting in the reaction of nitrogen and hydrogen to form ammonia.

  • Ammonification: Part of the ammonia present in the soil is derived from fixation. The other part comes from the process of decomposition of proteins and other nitrogen residues contained in dead organic matter and excreta. Bacteria and fungi present in the medium perform ammonification (or decomposition).

  • Nitrification: This consists of a series of reactions in which some species of microorganisms oxidize the ammonium ion (NH4+) to nitrite (NO2-) or nitrite to nitrate (NO3-). It is called autotrophic when initiated by ammonia (NH3) and performed by autotrophic organisms.

  • Denitrification: At this stage, denitrifying bacteria, such as Pseudomonas denitrificans can convert nitrates into molecular nitrogen, which returns to the atmosphere; thus, completing its cycle.

According to [13], modern man has altered the nitrogen cycle by introducing large amounts of reactive nitrogen into the environment, mainly because it is an essential nutrient in agriculture. Livestock breeding, especially in intensive systems, is one of the processes that incorporate high amounts of nitrogen into the environment. Particularly in the poultry industry, birds are primarily fed protein-rich diets with nitrogen content beyond what is necessary to meet their nutritional needs. Animals do not metabolize much of the ingested nitrogen. This is because of their food conversion, which is often inefficient. Thus, nitrogen is excreted and exposed to microbial activity, which generates gases with potentially harmful effects when present at high concentrations in the environment, such as ammonia from the decomposition of poultry manure [15].

3. Nitrogen from broiler diet

[7] stated that broiler performance is directly influenced by the feed quality. Recommendations for feed composition are defined to aid the attainment of certain body mass values according to the age of the bird and to achieve maximum conversion efficiency. For this, it is necessary to offer diets with high energy levels and high crude protein content. As an example, the recommendation of feed formulation, according to the different phases of the broiler rearing cycle, suggested by Cobb-Vantress for Cobb500® broilers, states that according to the age of the birds, different nutritional recommendations are proposed to meet the needs of the animal [7]. Crude protein levels in the diet decrease with increasing age, while the energy level increases. This may be explained by the higher feed conversion rate of birds with increasing age, which implies higher feed intake to maintain the body mass gain of older birds compared to that of younger birds [7].

The utilization of dietary protein begins with protein digestion in the poultry proventriculum and ends in the transport of amino acids and peptides through the basolateral membrane of the small intestine. During passage through the crop, acidogenic bacteria partially denature the proteins. However, protein digestion is only achieved when it reaches the stomach. The stomach of the birds is divided into two parts: gizzard and proventriculum. The presence of food intake in the proventriculum promotes the production of hydrochloric acid and pepsinogen. The gizzard acts as a mechanical organ, without excretion or absorption, but is very important in mixing food intake with water, saliva, hydrochloric acid, and pepsin [16,17].

After absorption, amino acids are transported to the liver, and some are used in the synthesis of liver tissue proteins or blood proteins. Most amino acids cross the liver in the form of free proteins. They are later made available to other body tissues (especially muscle tissue) for protein synthesis [17]. Additionally, another purpose of amino acids is catabolic degradation for the release of energy to be used in biomolecule synthesis [7].

Among the structural functions of proteins, is the action on the composition of the bone matrix, connective tissue, and muscle tissue, among others. All different protein types are polymers of only 20 amino acids joined by peptide bonds [16,18].

Protein is the most expensive nutrient in a feed and a key element for the good performance of animals. Protein utilization depends on the amount, composition, and digestibility of its amino acids. Unlike carbohydrates and lipids, proteins do not have an amino acid reserve mechanism, and all excess amino acids supplied in the diet are catabolized. Metabolism of excess amino acids generates higher energy expenditure for excretion, causing an unnecessary caloric increase, thereby compromising the performance of the animals [16,19]. For a long time, poultry feed formulations were based on the crude protein concept, culminating in diets with high amino acid levels, exceeding the values required by the animals. Thus, once metabolized, the derivatives of these proteins became the precursors for uric acid formation, which, when excreted, is easily converted into ammonia [16].

From the industrial production of amino acids came the concept of an ideal protein, based on which rations were formulated, with a protein level closer to ideal levels. An ideal protein is one that achieves the exact balance of amino acids, without excess or scarcity, to meet the needs for maintenance and good protein utilization, reducing the use of amino acids as a source of energy and minimizing nitrogen excretion [17,20].

4. Nitrogen retention forms in broiler chickens

The performance of birds is directly related to the feed offered to them [7]. The purpose of poultry feed formulation is to adjust the amount of nutrients to that required by each strain according to the desired production level [17,21], to minimize excretion losses. Amino acid deficiency in the early phase prevents maximum protein deposition in tissues. On the contrary, excess nitrogen at the end of the production cycle is excreted as uric acid, generating nutrient waste, and additional caloric expenditure for the excretion process [22].

Nitrogen is a fundamental part of amino acid composition, and amino acids are used for protein synthesis. Except for water, proteins are the most important and abundant molecules in the body, because they perform numerous vital functions, being the main constituents of cell structure. They are used as nucleic acid precursors, coenzymes, hormones, and antibodies, among others. They are the basic elements for the formation of blood cells and are mainly used in the formation of organs and muscle tissue [18].

Of all nitrogen present in broiler feed, the percentage of carcass deposition can be influenced by animal characteristics, environmental conditions, and nutritional factors, as well as the age and gender of the birds [23]. In general, young birds have accelerated growth and during this period there is an intense deposition of muscle protein; thus, there is higher nitrogen retention in the carcass. According to [24], higher nitrogen retention is common in chicks. Because they are growing, they use the nutrient for deposition of proteins in tissues. Similarly, [25] observed higher nitrogen retention in younger broilers, with gradual deposition increase until 28 days of age. After this, nitrogen retention tends to decrease, indicating that growing animals require higher nitrogen levels because of the high nutrient deposition in protein tissues.

Lysine is the most abundant amino acid in broiler muscle, constituting an amino acid of great importance for the construction of skeletal muscle tissue [26]. Protein deposition in animals increases with increasing digestible lysine in the diet [27,28]. [29], while determining the lysine utilization efficiency for the two genders of Ross® broiler chickens, observed a variation from 49.6 (1 to 7 d) to 56.1% (36 to 42 d) in the efficiency for males and a variation in lysine utilization efficiency ranging from 55.0 (1 to 7 d) to 57.4% (36 to 42 d) for females. [22], evaluated different levels of lysine in the broiler diet of both genders of broiler chickens during the entire productive cycle and observed higher protein deposition in carcasses of males in the final phase of production. [30] estimated the presence of approximately 45.9% protein in broiler carcass, whereas [31] observed 51.8%.

5. Nitrogen disposition by broilers

The main means of nitrogen entry into the broiler rearing system is feeding. For a long time, the formulation of poultry feed was based on the concept of crude protein, according to which the amount of protein in the feed was defined by the feed nitrogen content multiplied by 6.25 [32]. As a result, diets had higher amino acid levels than required by the animals and excess nitrogen was eliminated through excreta [33,34]. Currently, it is possible to maintain poultry performance by decreasing protein in the feed formulation based on the concept of ideal protein [32].

According to [18], nitrogen not used for digestion is passed to the liver and converted to uric acid for excretion. According to these authors, the amino acids and proteins ingested by animals are sent to cells and are assigned to two different functions: synthesis of other amino acids and proteins for deposition in various tissues, especially muscle and catabolic degradation for energy release and use of that energy in biomolecule synthesis. Nitrogen found in bird fecal waste is excreted as uric acid (approximately 50%) [32], as well as undigested protein. Microbial degradation of uric acid in excreta is the main source of ammonia formation in a poultry facility. Bacillus pasteuri bacteria, which conduct the decomposition process, require a pH of approximately 8.5 for optimal growth. Additionally, the process involves enzymes, such as uricase and urease. Uricase converts uric acid to allantoin, which is later converted to glyoxylate and urea. Urease, in the presence of water, breaks down urea into ammonia (NH3) and carbon dioxide (CO2), and the formation of NH3 is followed by decomposition of waste under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Because it has no ionic charge, ammonia in gaseous species is easily released into the atmosphere [35].

In addition to excreta, animal mortality also represents an important source of nitrogen loss in the system and can reach expressive values, especially in high-density rearing systems. Mortality is dependent on factors, such as housing density, thermal conditioning, and bird age, among others [36]. Therefore, the mortality rate should be accounted for in the nitrogen balance calculations in poultry houses [7].

Nitrogen loss in a broiler rearing system can be estimated using the concept of mass balance [7, 37]. In this method, the nitrogen inputs and outputs of the poultry house are quantified and based on the algebraic difference between the amount of nitrogen present in the feed, litter, and poultry, its loss is calculated. However, it has a disadvantage in that this method does not specify losses of N in the form of NH3, N2, or NOx [7].

Nitrogen is easily found as nitrate and ammonia in poultry houses. According to [38], undigested poultry protein is converted to ammoniacal nitrogen through bacterial activity, resulting in ammonia (NH3) and ammonium (NH4 +) formation. Through nitrification, NH4 + is transformed into nitrate, which, because it is water-soluble [39], is the main form of groundwater contamination. Excess nitrogen and other nutrients lead to soil acidification and eutrophication of water bodies [2,40,41].

[42], studied the performance of broilers fed low-protein diets, which were raised at different temperatures and observed that low-protein diets impaired performance and nitrogen retention efficiency of broilers raised under heat stress. However, low-protein diets may be offered to broilers raised in environments with air temperatures between 20 and 25 °C, because no changes in performance or carcass quality were observed, in addition to the minimization of nitrogen excretion. The authors pointed out that, under thermoneutral conditions, animal fed diets formulated with 15% crude protein excreted only 11.3% and 23.8% of the ingested nitrogen when housed in environments with air temperature maintained at 20 °C and 25 °C, respectively. However, poultry subjected to heat stress (32 °C) excreted approximately 63% of the nitrogen from the diet [42].

According to [43,44], waste accumulation time influences N concentration. Fresh excreta have higher N content that, over time, can be mineralized and volatilized in the form of ammonia.

6. Steps involved in the transformation of nitrogen to ammonia

Because most poultry diets have high-protein levels, excess nitrogen, which is unused by the body, is eliminated with the feces and is later degraded, releasing ammonium (NH4 +). This, in turn, is converted to ammonia gas (NH3), which is highly volatile, resulting in nitrogen losses to the atmosphere [38]. Birds excrete nitrogen in solid substances, more precisely in the uric acid form. It is possible to verify, in poultry excrement, a larger and darker lower plate (feces), and a smaller white upper plate, which is uric acid. Thus, bird excreta is composed of feces and “urine,” and therefore, they is richer in nitrogen when compared to swine and/or cattle feces [45].

In production systems where animals are kept in confinement, the air quality inside the facilities becomes a limiting factor in production. High-ammonia concentrations can substantially affect poultry performance [46], and therefore, is a major concern from both an economic and environmental standpoint. According to [47], NH3 volatilization from animal waste is the second-largest source of ammonia emission into the atmosphere (approximately 32 Tg N year-1), only behind that of wet deposition (approximately 46 Tg N year-1).

Ammonia is the product of the microbial decomposition of uric acid excreted by poultry. According to [46], there are numerous biological, physical, and chemical processes involved in ammonia generation and emission. Considering the broiler litter layer as a control volume, these processes, briefly, include ammonia generation, the division between the adsorbed phase and the aqueous phase of ammonium ions, balance between ammonium ions and free ammonia in the aqueous solution, division between the solid/aqueous phase and the ammonia gas phase, and convective mass transfer of ammonia from the surface to the atmosphere [46].

Nitrogen excreted by broilers is mineralized by bacteria, releasing ammonium ions (NH4 +) from the litter. NH4 +, in the presence of moisture and oxygen, results in the formation ammonia, which is a highly volatile substance that is easily released into the air [15]. According to [7], under favorable environmental conditions and excreta deposition on the litter, the bacteriological degradation process begins, resulting in the formation of simpler compounds. This process occurs as long as the raw material is available and the final inorganic substances are volatilized or assimilated by other living things, such as vegetables if they are used as fertilizer. The main process that constitutes the N biogeochemical cycle in a poultry facility is mineralization, which is defined, according to [48], as a complex set of chemical reactions, governed mainly by biological means, where an organic substrate is converted into living biomass and mineral waste.

Ammonium ions in broiler litter are divided into the adsorbed and dissolved phase. Ammonia dissolved in the liquid portion of the litter surface may exist in the ammonium ion form and as free ammonia. This relationship is expressed by the dissociation constant (Kd). According to [49], for the prediction of the equilibrium ammonia gas concentration over manure slurries and litter, [50] determined a disassociation constant of ammoniacal-N, and [51] developed Henry’s Law constant. Henry's constant (Kh) describes the equilibrium between free ammonia in the aqueous and gas phase [45]. According to [52], this constant characterizes the ratio between a population of molecules of a given compound in two phases, determining the relative compatibility of the compound for each medium to the equilibrium between the vapor and solution phase. To [49], to determine the concentration of ammonia in the air, which is in equilibrium with free ammonia in the liquid film on the free surface of water and air, Henry's law is used (Eq. 1). According to these authors, Henry's Law constant is also affected by temperature (Eq. 2). With the convective mass transfer, part of the gaseous ammonia from the broiler litter surface is transferred to the facility atmosphere [45].

Where:

[NH3]liq: concentration of free ammonia nitrogen in liquid (kg/m3); [NH3]gas,surf: concentration of free ammonia in the gas at the liquid film at the water-air free surface (kg/m3); H: Henry’s constant (dimensionless).

The litter ammonia emission process involves the transportation of the aqueous phase or solid phase of ammonia to the gaseous phase in the atmosphere. The poultry litter ammonia volatilization rate is directly linked to NH3 dissolved in the solution that surrounds the litter particles. In contrast, the availability of ammonia in the broiler litter solution is influenced by factors, such as pH, humidity, temperature, and NH4 + concentration. Under these circumstances, NH4 + (which has low volatilization) is converted to NH3 (which is a highly volatile compound) [7].

Ammonia from broiler litter is volatilizable into the air circulating in the environment. Before being emitted into the atmosphere, ammonia is enveloped at equilibrium in the liquid (l) and gaseous (g) phases (Reactions 1-3) [53].

The balance between ammonia and ammonium ions is influenced by temperature (T) and pH. At pH values below 7.0, almost all ammonia is bound to ammonium and is not subject to volatilization. The manure pH value is decisive because it establishes the ammonia concentration in the aqueous or gaseous phase, influencing its release. Ammonia emission begins when pH is close to 7 and increases significantly when pH is greater than 8 [46]. At pH lower than 7, the H+ ions in the litter increase the ammonium: ammonia ratio, which means that more ammonia will be converted into nonvolatile ammonium ions [54].

Air temperature influences the coefficient of convective mass transfer and litter temperature may interfere with Henry's constant, the dissociation constant, and also the diffusion and generation of ammonia in the litter [45]. Elevated temperatures favor ammonia concentrations because it influences the dissociation constant Kd. The volatilization equilibrium of gaseous ammonia follows Henry's Law for dilute systems.

The partial pressure of gaseous ammonia, NH3 (g), is proportional to the concentration of liquid ammonia, NH3 (l). Ammonia volatilization from litter to air is defined as mass flow. This mass flow can be defined as the product of the difference in the partial pressure between the two media and a mass transfer coefficient. A higher partial pressure difference increases flow. Mass transfer coefficients increase as air velocity increases [53].

For the interphase transport system, there are many proposed theories, notably the Two Film Theory by Welty and Boundary Layer Theory by Olesen and Sommer, which gave rise to a general equation for the transfer flow of mass [7,45].

  • a) Two Film Theory. According to [7], this theory assumes that:

    1. The transfer rate between films is governed by the diffusion rate through each interface;

    2. There is no other resistance during the transfer of liquid or gaseous NH3 through the interfaces.

According to [55], the NH3 transfer process is comprised of three steps, namely:

  1. Diffusion of NH3 from the interior of excreta and litter to the surface;

  2. NH3(l) transfer through the surface liquid layer;

  3. Convective transfer of NH3 (g) between a thin air film and then to air.

[56] proposed a process-based model that describes the turnover of organic matter and gas emissions, called the Manure-DNDC. In this model, the authors applied the Two Film Theory to the prediction of ammonia emission from the liquid surface of excreta into the air. [57] used ultrasonication to reduce ammonia levels in livestock waste, thereby improving anaerobic digestion efficiency. To model the mass transfer, [57] used the Two Film Theory, and from this, they estimated the ammonia mass transfer rate.

  • a) Boundary Layer Theory: As stated by [7], this theory suggests that NH3 volatilization occurs in two stages:

    1. Diffusion through the liquid layer surrounding the litter particles or excreta;

    2. Convective transfer of the liquid surface through the boundary layer and, soon after, to the environment.

Furthermore, [7] reported that [55] used Fick's Law (Eq. 3) to mathematically represent the ammonia transfer from the liquid surface surrounding the litter particles.

where:

j (kg m-2 s-1): is the NH3 mass flow; Dg: NH3 diffusion coefficient in the air; Cg: NH3 concentration (kg m-3) above the boundary layer; Cg,0: NH3 concentration in the boundary layer underlying the surface of the liquid layer surrounding the manure particles or litter; δg: laminar boundary layer thickness (m); Kg: convective coefficient of NH3 transfer in the air above the boundary layer (m s-1).

According to the report by [58], the boundary layer theory refers to the resistance that limits ammonia transfer from excreta to free airflow. It is most commonly used to estimate the gas phase mass transfer coefficient in controlled environments [58]. They evaluated the effect of different wind tunnel geometry on boundary layers and their effect on ammonia emission. It was observed that as the boundary layer thickness increased with the wind tunnel size, a higher boundary layer thickness increased the resistance of the mass transfer process from the emission surface, corroborating the boundary layer theory.

The main variables that affect NH3 volatilization are pH, relative humidity, and litter temperature. As the availability of poultry excreta in litter increases, so does the microbial population that acts on organic matter mineralization and uric acid transformation in the litter, with consequent increases in its NH4 + content [7]. In the opinion of [45], there are still other factors that present a major influence on the ammonia emission rate to be considered, such as litter material, nitrogen content in poultry feed, animal gender, breeding density, rearing time, age of birds, litter thickness, presence of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms, urease enzyme, renewal rate, air velocity, and reuse of litter.

Producers must be aware of all these factors to ensure good air quality and, when necessary, take appropriate measures to maintain an appropriate indoor environment for good poultry performance. The breeding environment must provide conditions in which the animal spends the least energy to adapt to the environment, as well as promote better welfare for both poultry and workers.

7. Final considerations

From this review, it is clear that broiler production results, directly or indirectly, in a large amount of pollutants at all stages of the production chain, and ammonia is the main gas produced. Thus, it is important to understand all the processes involved in its generation and how it affects the health and welfare of animals and humans present in these environments.

Furthermore, the nitrogen present in urea, uric acid, and proteins undigested by poultry is the main source of ammonia generation in the production system. Once excreted, it is decomposed and releases, as products, ammonium or ammonia gas. Another major nitrogen exit pathway in the system is mortality. Temperature, humidity, and pH are crucial in ammonia production in poultry houses. In addition to these, many other factors greatly influence the processes of ammonia generation, transformation, and volatilization, such as rearing density, age of the animals, litter thickness, and presence of microorganisms, among others.

The path taken by nitrogen in the broiler production system involves several stages, the most important of which are the synthesis of uric acid and excretion by poultry; mineralization of nitrogen present in excreta; volatilization of ammonia present in the litter.

Therefore, producers need to be able to identify the variables and understand the processes that cause the highest generation and emission of ammonia, so that appropriate management techniques can be adopted to maintain good air quality in the microenvironment of production units.

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with support from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPQ) - Brazil; This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001; and also support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerias (FAPEMIG). The authors would also like to thank Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), Iowa State University, Department of Agricultural Engineering (DEA-UFV) and Center for Research in Environment and Agroindustry Systems Engineering (AMBIAGRO).

References

[1] ABPA. Annual Report of the Brazilian Association of Animal Protein. Brazil, [online]. 2018, 176 P. Available at: http://abpabr.com.br/storage/files/relatorio-anual-2018.pdfLinks ]

[2] Oviedo-Rondón, E.O., Technologies to mitigate the environmental impact of broiler production. Rev Bras Zootec., 37(spe), pp. 239-252, 2008. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982008001300028 [ Links ]

[3] Terzich, M., Pope, M.J., Cherry. T.E. and Hollinger, J., Survey of pathogens in poultry litter in the United States. J Appl Poult Sci., 9(3), pp. 287-29, 2000. DOI: 10.1093/japr/9.3.287 [ Links ]

[4] Angnes, G., Oliveira, P.A.V., Robin, P., Haussona, M. and Romanelli, T., Emissão de amônia durante a produção de frangos de corte em aviário tipo Dark House no Sul do Brasil. In: Paula, M.O., Tinôco I.F.F, Souza, C.F. and Baêta, F.C., Ambiência e engenharia na produção animal sustentável: condições de climas quente e temperado, 1a ed., Viçosa, Suprema, 2016, pp. 14-18. [ Links ]

[5] Sousa, F.C., Tinôco, I.F.F., Silva, J.N., Baptista, F.J.F., Souza, C.F. and Silva, A.L., Gas emission in the poultry production. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, 5, pp. 49-55, 2017. DOI: 10.26667/2318-1265jabb.v5n2p49-55 [ Links ]

[6] Sousa, F.C., Tinôco, I.F.F., Paula, M.O., Silva, A.L., Souza, C.F., Batista, F.J.F. and Barbari, M., Medidas para minimizar a emissão de amônia na produção de frangos de corte: revisão. Rev Bras Eng Biossistemas, 10(1), pp. 51-61, 2016. DOI: 10.18011/bioeng2016v10n1p51-61 [ Links ]

[7] Mendes, L.B., Tinôco, I.F.F., Souza, C.F. and Saraz, J.A.O., O ciclo do nitrogênio na criação de frangos de corte e suas perdas na forma de amônia volátil: uma revisão. PUBVET, 6(20), pp. 1381-1386, 2012. [ Links ]

[8] Nimmermark, S. and Gustafsson, G., Influence of temperature, humidity and ventilation rate on the release of odour and ammonia in a floor housing system for laying hens. International Commission of Agricultural Engineering (CIGR) [online]. 7, 2005. Available at: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/10423/BC%2004%20008%20Gustafsson%20final%20Oct2005.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yLinks ]

[9] Nimmermark, S., Lund, V., Gustafsson, G. and Eduard, W., Ammonia, dust and bacteria in welfare-oriented systems for laying hens. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 16(1), pp. 103-113, 2009. [ Links ]

[10] Abreu, P.G. and Abreu, V.M.N., Maximização dos sistemas de ventilação na avicultura. Nordeste Rural, Concórdia, 2005. [ Links ]

[11] Pedrolo, C., Nitrogênio. [online]. 2014. Centro Universitário Franciscano. Available at: https://www.infoescola.com/elementos-quimicos/nitrogenio/Links ]

[12] Fogaça, J.R.V., Nitrogênio. [online]. 2015. Available at: https://alunosonline.uol.com.br/quimica/nitrogenio.htmlLinks ]

[13] Rocha, J.C., Rosa, A.H. and Cardoso, A.A., Introdução à química ambiental, 2a Ed, Porto Alegre, Artmed, Bookman, 2009, 256 P. [ Links ]

[14] Barreto, A., Ciclo do nitrogênio. [online]. 2013. Available at: https://dicasdeciencias.com/2013/09/14/resumao-ciclo-do-nitrogenio/. [ Links ]

[15] Gay, S.W. and Knowlton, K.F., Ammonia emissions and animal agriculture. Virginia Coop Ext, 442(110), pp. 1-5. 2005. [ Links ]

[16] Maia, R.C., Aminoácidos de cadeia ramificada e suas relações com lisina digestível para frangos de corte. Thesis MSc., Department of Zootechnics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2013. [ Links ]

[17] Albino, L.F.T., Barros, V.R.S.M., Maia, R.C., Tavernari, F.C. and Silva, D.L., Produção e nutrição de frangos de corte, 1 Ed, Viçosa, Editora UFV,Brazil, 2017, 360 P. [ Links ]

[18] Nelson, D.L., Lehninger, A.L. and Cox, M.M., Lehninger principles of biochemistry, 5th Ed, New York, WH Freeman and Company, 2011. [ Links ]

[19] Dionízio, M.A., Rostagno, H.S., Paez, L.E., Buteri, C.B. and Albino, L.F., Nutrição vs. Poluição ambiental, [online]. 2005. Available at: https://polinutri.com.br/upload/artigo/167.pdfLinks ]

[20] Mitchell, H., Comparative nutrition of man and domestic animals. 1st Ed, Academic Press Inc, Illinois, USA, 1962, 701 P. [ Links ]

[21] Duarte, K.F. and Junqueira, O.M., Aminoácidos sintéticos e enzimas: ferramentas importantes na redução dos custos de produção de frangos de corte. Revista Produção Animal - Avicultura, [online]. 73, 2013. Available at: https://www.avisite.com.br/revista/materias/aminoacidos_sinteticos_enzimas.htmlLinks ]

[22] Buteri, C.B., Efeitos de diferentes planos nutricionais sobre a composição e o desempenho produtivo e econômico de frangos de corte. Thesis Dr., Department of Zootechnics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2003. [ Links ]

[23] Silva, C.R., Performance and deposition of nutrients of broilers chickens fed with different lysine levels. Thesis Dr, Department of Zootechnics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2012. [ Links ]

[24] Nery, L.R., Albino, L.F.T., Rostagno, H.S., Campos, A.M.A and Silva, C.R., Valores de energia metabolizável de alimentos determinados com frangos de corte. R. Bras. Zootec., 36(5), pp. 1354-1358, 2007. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982007000600018 [ Links ]

[25] Lopez, G. and Leeson, S., Relevance of Nitrogen correction for assessment of metabolizable energy with broilers to forty-nine days of age. Poultry Science, 86(8), pp. 1696-1704, 2007. DOI: 10.1093/ps/86.8.1696 [ Links ]

[26] Maruno, M., Avaliação da essencialidade da metionina e lisina em frangos de corte pelo turnover de isótopos estáveis de carbono. Thesis MSc., Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil, 2013. [ Links ]

[27] Eits, R.M., Kwakkel, R.P., Verstegen, M.W.A., Stoutjesdijk, P. and Greef, K.H., Protein and lipid deposition rates in male broiler chickens: separate responses to amino acids and protein-free energy. Poult Sci., 81(4), pp. 472-480, 2002. DOI: 10.1093/ps/81.4.472 [ Links ]

[28] Trindade-Neto, M.A., Takeara, P., Toledo, A.L., Kobashigawa, E., Albuquerque, R. and Araújo, L.F., Digestible lysine levels for male broilers in the period from 37 to 49 days of age. Rev Bras Zootec., 38(3), pp. 508-514, 2009. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982009000300016 [ Links ]

[29] Brito, C.O., Avaliação de dietas formuladas com aminoácidos totais e digestíveis e estimativas do crescimento. Thesis Dr., Department of Zootechnics , Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2007. [ Links ]

[30] Summers, J.D., Spratt, D. and Atkinson, J.L., Broiler weight gain and carcass composition when fed diets varying in amino acid balance, dietary energy, and protein level. Poult Sci., 71(2), pp. 263-273, 1992. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0710263 [ Links ]

[31] Malone, G.W., Saylor, W.W., Ariza, M.G., Lomax, K.M. and Kaifer, C.R., Acid preservation and utilization of poultry carcasses resulting from mortality losses. Progress through research and extension, newark, 1987, 4 P. [ Links ]

[32] Silva, Y.L., Rodrigues, P.B., Freitas, R.T.F., Bertechini, A.G., Fialho, E.T., Fassani, E.J. and Pereira, C.R., Redução de proteína e fósforo em rações com fitase para frangos de corte no período de 1 a 21 dias de idade. Desempenho e teores de minerais na cama. Rev Bras Zootec., 35(3), pp. 840-848, 2006. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982006000300029 [ Links ]

[33] Cauwenberghe, S.V. and Burnham, D., New developments in amino acid and protein nutrition of poultry, as related to optimal performance and reduced nitrogen excretion. In: European Symposium of Poultry Nutrition., Blankenberg, Belgium, 2001. [ Links ]

[34] Pavan, A.C., Móri, C., Garcia, E.A., Scherer, M.R. and Pizzolante, C.C., Níveis de proteína bruta e de aminoácidos sulfurados totais sobre o desempenho, a qualidade dos ovos e a excrȩão de nitrogênio de poedeiras de ovos marrons. Rev Bras Zootec., 34(2), pp. 568-574, 2005. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982005000200026 [ Links ]

[35] Ritz, C.W., Fairchild, B.D. and Lacy, M.P., Implications of ammonia production and emissions from commercial poultry facilities: a review. J Appl Poult Res., 13(4), pp. 684-692, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.4.684Links ]

[36] Heier, B.T., Hogåsen, H.R. and Jarp, J., Factors associated with mortality in Norwegian broiler flocks. Prev Vet Med., 53(1-2), pp. 147-158, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00266-5 [ Links ]

[37] Keener, H.M. and Zhao, L., A modified mass balance method for predicting NH3 emissions from manure N for livestock and storage facilities. Biosystems Engineering, 99(1), pp. 81-87, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.09.006 [ Links ]

[38] Gates, R.S., Poultry diet manipulation to reduce output. In: Simpósio sobre Resíduos da Produção Avícola. Concórdia, 2000, pp. 63-75. [ Links ]

[39] Kelleher, B.P., Leahy, J.J., Henihan, A.M., O’dwyer, T.F., Sutton, D. and Leahy, M.J., Failure and Fracture analysis of bolt assembled on the fan used in the internal combustion engine. Bioresour. Technol., 83, pp. 27-36, 2001. [ Links ]

[40] Sims, J.T. and Wolf, D.C., Poultry waste management: agricultural and environmental issues. Adv Agron., 52, pp. 1-83, 1994. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60621-5 [ Links ]

[41] Marín, O.L.Z., Caracterização e avaliação do potencial fertilizante e poluente de distintas camas de frango submetidas a reusos sequenciais na Zona da Mata do Estado de Minas Gerais. Thesis MSc, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2011. [ Links ]

[42] Faria Filho, D.E., Rosa, P.S., Figueiredo, D.F., Dahlke F., Macari, M. and Furlan, R.L., Dietas de baixa proteína no desempenho de frangos criados em diferentes temperaturas. Pesquisa Agropecuária Bras., 41(1), pp. 101-106, 2006. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2006000100014 [ Links ]

[43] Melo, C., Alvarenga, R.R., Santos, L.M., Oliveira, D.M., Lago, A.A., Oliveira, E.C., Rodrigues, P.B. and Zangeronimo, M.G., Influência de diferentes intervalos de coleta de excretas sobre o valor energético e de nutrientes metabolizáveis de alimentos para aves. Acta Tecnológica, 9(2), pp. 27-32, 2014. [ Links ]

[44] Mendes, M.A.S.A., Tinôco, I.F.F., Vieira, M.F.A., Coelho, D.J.R., Souza, T.D., Oliveira, K.P. and Dalólio, F.S., Caracterização dos resíduos produzidos por aves poedeiras criadas em sistemas verticais. In: Paula, M.O., Tinôco I.F.F, Souza, C.F., Baêta, F.C., Eds., Ambiência e engenharia na produção animal sustentável: condições de climas quente e temperado, 1ra ed., Suprema, Viçosa, Brasil, 2016, pp. 133-137. [ Links ]

[45] Egute, N.D.S., Abrao, A. and Carvalho, F., Estudo do processo da geração de amônia a partir de resíduos avícolas visando a produção de hidrogênio. Rev. Bras. Pes. Des., 12(1), pp. 1-6, 2010. [ Links ]

[46] Liu, Z., Wang, L. and Beasley, D.B., A review of emission models of ammonia released from broiler houses. In: 2006 ASAE Annual Meeting. Portland: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2006, paper No. 064101. DOI: 10.13031/2013.21568 [ Links ]

[47] Felix, E.P. and Cardoso, A.A., Amônia (NH3) atmosférica: fontes, transformação, sorvedouros e métodos de análise. Quim Nova., 27(1), pp. 123-130, 2004. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-40422004000100022 [ Links ]

[48] Manzoni, S. and Porporato, A., Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: theory and models across scales. Soil Biol Biochem., 41(7), pp. 1355-1379, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.031 [ Links ]

[49] Gates, R.S., Taraba, J.L., Ferguson, N.S. and Turner, L.W., A technique for determining ammonia equilibrium and volatilization from broiler litter. In: 1997 ASAE Annual International Meeting, 1(3), paper No. 974074, Minneapolis, USA, 1997. [ Links ]

[50] Muck, R.E. and Steenhuis, T.S., Nitrogen losses from manure storages. Agric Wastes, 4,pp. 41-54, 1982. DOI: 10.1016/0141-4607(82)90053-1 [ Links ]

[51] Hashimoto, A,G. and Ludington, D.C., Ammonia desorption from concentrated chicken manure slurries. In: Proceedings Livestock Waste Management and Pollution Abatement, St Joseph MI, USA, 1981, pp. 117-121. [ Links ]

[52] Schwarzenbach, R.P., Gschwend, P.M. and Imboden, D.M., Environmental Organic Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 1993, 681 P. [ Links ]

[53] Takai, H., Pedersen, S., Johnsen, J.O., Metz, J.H.M., Koerkamp, P.G., Metz, J.H.M., Uenk, G.H., Phillips, V.R., Holden, M.R., Sneath, R.W., Short, J.L., White, R.P., Hartung, J., Seedorf, J., Schröder, M., Linkert, K.H., Pedersen, S., Takai, H., Johnsen, J.O. and Wathes, C.M., Concentrations and emissions of airborne endotoxins and microorganisms in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J Agric Eng Res., 70(1), pp. 79-95, 1998. DOI: 10.1006/jaer.1997.0280 [ Links ]

[54] Oliveira, M.C., Almeida, C.V., Andrade, D.O. and Rodrigues, S.M.M., Dry matter content, pH and volatilized ammonia from poultry litter treated or not with different additives. Rev Bras Zootec., 32(4), pp. 951-954, 2003. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982003000400022 [ Links ]

[55] Ni, J., Mechanistic models of ammonia release from liquid manure: a review. J Agric Eng Res., 72(1), pp. 1-17, 1999. DOI: 10.1006/jaer.1998.0342 [ Links ]

[56] Li, C., Salas, W., Zhang, R., Krauter, C., Rotz, A. and Mitloehner, F., Manure-DNDC: a biogeochemical process model for quantifying greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from livestock manure systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems, 93(2), pp. 163-200, 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s10705-012-9507-z [ Links ]

[57] Cho, S.K., Lee, M.K., Kim, D.H., Yun, Y.M., Jung, K.W., Shin, H.S. and Oh, S.E., Enhanced anaerobic digestion of livestock waste by ultrasonication: a tool for ammonia removal and solubilization. Korean J Chem Eng., 31(4), pp. 619-623, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11814-013-0284-4 [ Links ]

[58] Saha, C.K., Wu, W., Zhang, G. and Bjerg, B., Assessing effect of wind tunnel sizes on air velocity and concentration boundary layers and on ammonia emission estimation using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Comput Electron Agric., 78(1), pp. 49-60, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2011.05.011 [ Links ]

M. de Oliveira Vilela, received the BSc. Eng. in Agricultural and Environmental Engineering in 2014 from the Federal University of Mato Grosso and MSc. in Agricultural Engineering in the area of Rural Ambience Constructions in 2016 from the Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil. She is currently a doctoral student in the Agricultural Engineering and Rural Constructions area, member of AMBIAGRO (Center for Research in Agro-Industrial Ambience and Engineering Systems), Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa Brazil. ORCID: 0000-0003-3975-3571

R.S. Gates, received the BSc. Eng. in Agricultural Engineering at the University of Minnesota in 1978, the MSc. in Agricultural Engineering in 1980 and PhD. in Biological Engineering in 1984, all of them from the Cornell University, USA. He is currently professor at Iowa State University, and the Director of the Egg Industry Center. Among his honors and awards has several honorable mentions and awards ASABE since 1987 in the areas of livestock, environment, and biology; He is a member of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ASABE, 2010) His research interest include: controlled environment systems analysis, control and simulation, dietary manipulation in poultry and livestock for reduced aerial gases and building emissions; poinsettia propagation and hydroponic lettuce, control systems development including fuzzy logic, heuristics and vapor pressure deficit, livestock production models for real-time economic optimization. ORCID: 0000-0003-2812-1739

C. de Fátima Souza, received the BSc. Eng. in Agricultural Engineering from the Federal University of Lavras, Brazil in 1987, the MSc. in Agricultural Engineering in 1981 from the Federal Univesity of Viçosa, Brazil and PhD. in Zootechnics in 2001 from the Paulista State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Brazil. She is currently titular professor at the Agricultural Engineering Department and coordinator of AMBIAGRO (Center for Research in Agro-industrial Environment and Engineering Systems), Federal University of Viçosa. Its teach and research work is turned to planning and project of all infrastructure referring to the installations, would need to the productive processes, including those for handling and treatment two residues resulting from animal production. Member of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. ORCID: 0000-0003-2059-2755

C. Gutemberg de Souza Teles Junior, received the BSc. Eng. in Agricultural and Environmental Engineering in 2014 from the Federal University of Mato Grosso, Brazil. MSc. in Agricultural Engineering in the area of Rural Ambience Constructions in 2016, and PhD. in Agricultural Engineering in 2019, all of them from the Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil. He is currently professor at Federal Rural University of the Amazon, Institute of Agricultural Sciences - Campus Belém, Pará, Brazil, in the Rural Construction and Environment and Processing and Storage of Agricultural Products areas. ORCID: 0000-0002-3519-0938

F. Campos de Sousa, received the BSc. Eng. in Agricultural and Environmental Engineering in 2012, the MSc. in Agricultural Engineering in the area of Rural Ambience Constructions in 2014, and PhD. in Agricultural Engineering in 2018, all of them from the Federal University of Viçosa, Brasil. She is currently professor at the Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), Department of Agricultural Engineering, in the Rural Constructions and Environment Area. Member of AMBIAGRO (Center for Research in Agro-Industrial Ambience and Engineering Systems), Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa Brazil. Collaborating member of ICAAM (Institute of Mediterranean Agricultural and Environmental Sciences), Research and Development Unit (R&D) of the University of Évora - Portugal. fernanda.sousa@ufv.br ORCID: 0000-0002-5584-728X

How to cite: Vilela, M. de O, Gates, R.S, Souza, C.F, Teles Junior, C.G.S. and Sousa, F.C., Nitrogen transformation stages into ammonia in broiler production: sources, deposition, transformation, and emission into the environment. DYNA, 87(214), pp. 221-228, July-September, 2020.

Received: November 02, 2019; Revised: July 03, 2020; Accepted: July 16, 2020

Creative Commons License The author; licensee Universidad Nacional de Colombia