Introduction
Cocoa beans are originated as seeds in fruit pods of the tropical crop Theobroma cacao L., that is cultivated in the humid lowland tropics generally by small-scale producers. There are three main cocoa types: Forastero (bulk grade), Criollo (fine grade), and hybrid Trinitario (fine grade). These varieties offer wide differences in their final flavor due to factors such as their genotype, soil, climate, and harvest conditions, and to the post-harvest technology used in fermentation, drying, and roasting stages [1].
Fermentation plays a major role in the development of aroma precursors like free amino acids, peptides, and reducing sugars, due to the microbial activity and endogenous enzymes of cocoa beans. Free amino acids and peptides are formed by proteolytic reactions induced by endogenous proteases (aspartic proteinase and carboxypeptidase) during cocoa beans storage [2, 3]. Contrarily, reducing sugars such as fructose and glucose are products of the hydrolysis of sucrose [4, 5]. Both amino acids and reducing sugars are precursors in Maillard's reaction. Thus, they are responsible of the formation of the compounds which affect cocoa flavor during roasting [6, 7, 8, 9]. Therefore, determination of the amino acid profile is extremely important to assess the cocoa nutritional value as well as to predict the development of flavor compounds during the manufacture of cocoa-based products. An optimum fermentation originates good flavor and aroma, while an inadequate process might considerably demerit the product [4, 10]. Voigt et al. [2, 3] concluded that peptides and hydrophobic amino acids are important cocoa-specific flavor precursors. On the other hand, Kirchhoff et al. [11, 12] pointed out a correlation between the accumulation of free amino acids and the generation of essential aroma precursors, also noticed that they are formed by pH-dependent proteolysis processes. Moreover, Afoakwa et al. [1] observed that the nature of the amino components is critical for cocoa flavor due to their influence in the formation of heterocyclic compounds which affect the resulting aroma.
Therefore, to evaluate the cocoa quality is mandatory to study not only the compounds directly related with the flavor, but also their precursors. Thus, the analysis of amino acids during fermentation, drying and roasting stages could provide useful information to improve the post-harvest treatments and obtain a high-quality cocoa.
Venezuela is considered a producer of fine cocoa with excellent quality and a characteristic flavor. In recent years, measures have been implemented to increase production and to improve the economic competitiveness of cocoa. Several researchers [13-22] have been focused on the study of the chemical and physical parameters involved in the fermentation and drying processes, with the aim of improving post-harvest processes to increase the cocoa quality, especially of the Criollo variety. However, amino acids behavior during the different post-harvest stages has not been studied, although they are essential for cocoa flavor development.
Therefore, the main objective of this work was the determination of total and free amino acids content in Venezuelan cocoa during the fermentation and roasting stages. For this purpose, a high-performance liquid chromatographic method with DAD detection was optimized and validated.
Materials and methods
Reagents, solvents and standards
All solvents were of HPLC grade and all reagents were of analytical grade, unless indicated otherwise. Ethanol (EtOH) and acetonitrile (MeCN) were purchased from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). All amino acids were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Phenylisothiocyanate (PITC) and triethylamine (TEA) (99% w/w) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Milli-Q ultrapure water with a specific resistivity of 18 MΩ cm-1 was used for standards and samples preparation, reagents dilution and for cleaning purposes.
Acetate buffer was prepared with sodium acetate solution 0.07 mol L-1 and 99.7% w/w acetic acid from Fisher obtaining a final concentration of 0.05 mol L-1 and a pH=5.1. Individual stock standard solutions with 10000 µg mL-1 of each amino acid were prepared in reagent-grade water. All solutions were stored under refrigeration at 4 °C. Working solutions were weekly prepared by dilution of stock standard solutions in water.
Cocoa samples
To study the applicability of the proposed method, Criollo, Trinitario, and Forastero cocoa beans were fermented (1-7 days) and then roasted prior to their analysis.
Cocoa pods of the varieties ICS-1 (Trinitario) and IMC-67 (Forastero) were obtained from genetically identified trees grown on the Cocoa Genebank of Ocumare de la Costa (INIA-Aragua, Venezuela). Criollo Guasare, Zea, and San Juan were provided by the Cocoa Genebank of San Juan de Lagunillas (INIA-Merida, Venezuela), and Porcelana was obtained from the Cocoa Genebank of the Local Chama Station (Corpozulia, Venezuela).
Samples were processed as follows: cocoa seeds were subjected to fermentation process according to their variety. This process was performed in triplicate into 60 mL wooden boxes. The fermenting mass was turned over every 24 h. Each day three replicates were collected and analyzed. After fermentation, a drying process was performed for 6 days. Then, some of the samples were grounded, sieved (≤ 42 mesh), and defatted, according to the Soxhlet extraction method [23]. These were stored at -20 °C until analysis. Besides, with the aim of studying the roasting effect on the amino acids and reducing sugars profile, some fermented and dried samples were first roasted and then grounded and defatted. All samples were conserved in sealed PTFE containers, which were kept under refrigeration (4 °C) until analysis.
Extraction and derivatization of the amino acids
To carry out the total free amino acids extraction, 0.800 g of defatted cocoa powder were ultrasonicated for 15 min at 70 °C in 15 mL of purified water. The obtained extract was cooled to room temperature and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. Then the supernatant was transferred to a 25 mL volumetric flask filled with water and then filtered through a 0.22 urn membrane (Membrane support-220, Waters, USA).
Free amino acids were derivatized with PITC, following the method described by Bidlingmeyer et al. [24] with some modifications. Thus, 20 µL of sample were placed into a vial and mixed with 20 µL of ethanol and 20 µL of the derivative reagent solution (1:1:7 v/v/v PITC:TEA:Ethanol). Then, the vial was capped and exposed to microwave radiation in a domestic microwave oven (340 W for 40 s). Finally, 20 µL of the PTC-AA extract were injected into the HPLC system.
Amino acid derivatives analysis
After extraction and derivatization procedures, amino acid derivatives (PTC-AA) were present in a complex mixture, making necessary a sample cleanup to obtain chromatograms with good resolution.
A column-switching HPLC system in the circuit transfer mode was used for sample cleanup and PTC-AA separation and detection. The chromatographic system was composed by a quaternary pump, a column oven, an autosampler, a diode array detector (DAD) (Series 200 HPLC System, PerkinElmer; Norwalk, CT), and a digital workstation with TotalChrom software (Version 6.3) which was used as controller and data manager. Two additional Waters pumps (model 515) (Milford, MA, USA, Pump 1, Pump 2) were used to propel the extraction and transfer mobile phases. Injections were made with a Rheodyne type 7125 six-port valve equipped with a 100 µL loop. Two column-switching six-port valves (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA; SV 1, SV 2) were attached to the system and controlled by the workstation. Three columns were used in the system: 1) Precolumn 1: Oasis HLB column 20 x 3.9 mm; dp (particle diameter): 25 µm, used as extraction column; 2) Precolumn 2: Supelcosil™ LC-18 20 x 3 mm; dp: 5 µm, which replaced the loop injection previous to the analytical column; 3) Advantage Kromasil C18 column 150 x 3.0 mm i.d.; dp: 3 µm, used as analytical column. Figure 1 shows a schematic depiction of the column-switching system.
Analysis procedure
With SV 1 in load position (Figure 1a), 100 µL of PTC-AA extract were propelled by pump 1 at a flow-rate of 1 mL min-1, injected into the extraction column (precolumn 1), and washed with 2% acetonitrile in acetate buffer. PTC-AA were retained while endogenous sample components were eluted to waste. After 0.5 min, SV 1 was automatically rotated to inject position (Figure 1b) allowing pump 2 to propel the mobile phase (90% ethanol in acetate buffer) at 1.8 mL min-1. This way, enriched PTC-AA were eluted from extraction column and injected into precolumn 2.
After 0.13 min, SV 2 was changed to inject position and PCT-AA extract with 2% acetonitrile in acetate buffer was pushed by the pump 3 at 1.7 mL min-1 into the analytical column to perform the analytes separation. Simultaneously, SV 1 was changed to load position to carry out the re-equilibration of the extraction column (precolumn 1) before the next injection (Figure 1c).
Analytes separation was performed at 45 °C using two different mobile phases, mobile phase A: 2% acetonitrile in acetate buffer and mobile phase B: acetonitrile-water (60:40 v/v) in a gradient mode elution at flow rate of 1.7 mL min-1 and with the following program: 0 % solvent B (100% A) (5 min) to 35% B at 1.5 %B min-1 and up to 100% B (3 min) at 32.5 %B min-1.
A summary of the system operating conditions is shown in Table 1. Under these conditions, analytes were separated in less than 29 min, with good resolution and no matrix effect. A chromatogram of the separation of the AA derivatives is shown in Figure 2.
Step | System component | Conditions |
---|---|---|
Sample injection V = 0 min) | Rheodyne 7125 valve: inject position Switching-valve 1 : load position Switching-valve 2: inject position | Injection volume: 100 µL |
Sample extraction (7=0.50 min) | Extraction precolumn 1 : Oasis HLB (20 x 3.9 mm; dp: 25 um) | Mobile phase: 2% acetonitrile in 0.05 mol L-1 acetate buffer (pH= 5.1) Flow rate: 1.0 mL min-1 |
Analytes injection into Precolumn 2 (f =0.13 min) | Precolumn 2: Supelcosil LC-18 (20 x 3 mm; dp: 5 um) Switching-valve 1: inject position Switching-valve 2: load position | Mobile phase: 90% etlianol in O.OSmol L-1 acetate buffer (pH= 5.1) Flow rate: 1.8 mL min-1 |
Analytes injection into the analytical column Precolumn 1: re-conditioning before next injection | Advantage Kromasil CIS 100A (150mm x 3.0 mm; 3um) Switching-valve 1 : load position Switching-valve 2: inject position | Solvent A: 2% actonitrile in O.OSmol L-1 acetate buffer <pH= 5.1) Flow rate: 1.7 mL min-1 Mobile phase: 2% acetonitrile in 0.05 mol L-1 acetate buffer (pH= 5.1) Flow rate: 1.0 mL min1 |
Chromatographic separation (f = 29min) | Switching-valve 2: inject position | Solvent A: 2% actonitrile in 0.05 mo L-1 acetate buffer (pH= 5.1) Solvent B: 60% acetonitrile in water Gradient program: 0 % solvent B (100% A) (5 min) to 35% B at 1.5 B% min-1, and up to 100% B (3 min) at 32.5 B% min-1 Flow- ate: 1.7 mL min-1 Detection: DAD a 254nm |
Results and discussion
Microwave assisted derivatization optimization
PITC reacts with primary and secondary AA [25, 26]. The reaction occurred at room temperature and the best results were obtained with a reaction time of 15 min.
Aiming to decrease the analysis time, microwave radiation was used to assist the reaction [27]. Parameters such as microwave power and reaction time should be studied when this strategy is used. Therefore, time reaction was studied for two AA (glutamic acid and threonine) while maintaining microwave power at 340 W. The obtained results are shown in Figure 3.
As can be seen, irradiation time and peak area increased proportionally until 40 s. In consequence, 40 s was set as optimum derivatization time. Additionally, in Figure 4 a comparison between the derivatization reaction performance under standard conditions and assisted by microwave irradiation is presented. Although a similar efficiency is obtained with both methods, the reaction time is drastically decreased by using the microwave (from 15 min to 40 s).
Solid phase extraction
A Waters Oasis HLB precolumn was used for sample clean up and analytes extraction and preconcentration. This column is a universal polymeric reversed phase sorbent which allows to obtain quantitative and reproducible recoveries of the analytes due to the presence of a balanced composition of two monomers: N-vinilpirrolidone (hydrophilic) and divinylbencene (hydrophobic) [28]. The retention mechanisms are dipole-dipole interactions and Van der Waals forces for polar and non-polar compounds, respectively. Experimental parameters were optimized to achieve the maximum efficiency during extraction. The obtained results can be seen in Table 1.
Method validation
Accuracy, precision, linearity and matrix effect studies were carried out to validate the proposed method. The accuracy of the procedure was evaluated by performing recovery tests using spiked cocoa samples at different amino acid concentration levels. In all cases, recovery values ranged between 89% and 109%, with a relative standard deviation (%RSD) lower than 3.85% (n = 5), which indicates an excellent efficiency for the amino acids extraction and derivatization procedures.
The within-day and between-day precisions, expressed as %RSD, were established at three different amino acid concentration levels (low, middle and high) for aqueous standard solutions and for spiked cocoa samples. RSD < 2.9% (n = 5) were obtained for all the analytes, confirming the satisfactory precision of the proposed procedure.
Calibration curves for each AA were obtained from both standard aqueous solutions and spiked cocoa samples (standard additions) in a wide range of concentration (0.1 - 15.0 µg mL-1). Each calibration set included seven data points and each point was run at least three times. Good linearity between peak area and concentrations was achieved with correlation coefficients R2 > 0.9900 in all cases.
Sample matrix effect was studied by comparing the slopes of the calibration curves of the standard aqueous solutions with the slopes obtained when analyzing the spiked samples. A paired student t-test indicated that the slopes were not statistically different (P < 0.05), which denoted the absence of any matrix effect. Limits of detection, defined as a signal/noise ratio of 3:1, were between 0.04 and 0.20 µg mL-1 for all amino acids.
Free amino acids content in cocoa samples
Results of the free amino acid contents in the analyzed cocoa samples are shown in Table 2.
Abbreviations. DF: Day of fermentation; Por: Porcelana; Gua: Guasare; SJ: San Juan; IMC-67a: 1st season of harvest in year 1; IMC-67b: 2nd season of harvest in year 1; IMC-67c: 3rd season of harvest in year 1; IMC-67d: 3rd season of harvest in year 2; ISC-1a: 1st season of harvest in year 1; ISC-1st: 1° season of harvest in year 2; ND: Not detected.
In Figure 5, total, hydrophobic, acidic, and others amino acids content versus fermentation and roasting time is shown.
As can be seen, a progressive increase of total free amino acids was observed during fermentation, with a maximum on the 3rd day for Criollos, and on the 7th day for Forasteros and Trinitarios, while a significant decrease during roasting is observed for all types. This trend agrees with previously reported studies in this matter [11, 12, 29], confirming that amino acids are enzymatically released from the storage proteins during fermentation. It is also noticeable that all cocoas, in the absence of fermentation, showed an appreciable content of amino acids. Thus, the ratio of hydrophobic to acidic free amino acids provides information of the fermentation degree, since it changes while fermentation advances. The hydrophobic amino acid content increases linearly with the fermentation time, derived from the proteolytic activity over major storage proteins in cocoa seeds. Particularly, hydrophobic amino acids such as leucine, phenylalanine, valine, alanine, and isoleucine showed the greatest increase (Table 2). Voigt et al. [2] studied the proteolytic formation of the cocoa-specific aroma precursors in vitro using the vicilin-class globulin (VCG) from cocoa seeds as protein substrate and different proteases. They reported that the specific mixture of oligopeptides and hydrophobic free amino acids are formed by degradation of the cocoa globulin because of the action of two enzymes: the endogenous aspartic endoprotease and the carboxypeptidase. The aspartic endoprotease (pH 3.5) hydrolyses the peptide bonds in proteins producing oligopeptides with hydrophobic amino acid residues at their carboxyl terminal. These are substrates for the carboxypeptidase (pH 5.8), which acts on terminals originating the free hydrophobic amino acids [3, 27, 30].
As was previously described, unfermented cocoa samples contained low amounts of free total amino acids, ranging between 2.33 and 5.97 g kg-1 (Table 2) and with a predominance of acidic amino acids, which represented 17 - 64%, 41 - 44%, and 30 - 38 % of the total amino acids content for Criollo, Forastero, and Trinitario, respectively. Variation of acidic, hydrophobic, and others amino acids during fermentation for all types of cocoa is detailed in Figure 6.
In contrast, fermented beans presented a higher amount of total free amino acids (9.05 - 16.9 g kg-1) with a significant increase of the hydrophobic amino acids content (56 - 72%) and a decrease of the acidic ones of more than 25%. For example, the cocoa beans of IMC-67 1st season, 1st year (Forastero) had an acid: hydrophobic: others amino acid ratio of 43:49:8 in unfermented beans and 9:63:28 in the fermented ones (Figure 6 b). This trend agrees with the results reported by other researchers [4, 11], which reported total free amino acid amounts within the range of 2.4 - 5.1 g kg-1 for unfermented cocoa beans with an acidic:hydrophopic:other ratio of 18:30:52, and 9.4 - 14.5 g kg-1 (6:46:48 and 58:16:26) for fermented cocoa beans from Malaysia and Ghana.
The relative differences between our results and the reported ones could be attributed to proteolytic activity, which depends on the conditions of the fermentation process, including the mass and aeration during fermentation with a direct influence over the pH and temperature of the process, as well as the maturity, harvesting season, variety, and origin of the beans [1, 4]. Figure 6a shows the amino acid composition in different varieties of Criollo cocoa (first and last day of fermentation). The variations in this composition can be justified by their genetic origin. Moreover, differences in the cocoa beans from Zea and San Juan, which are genetically equivalent, can be attributed to soil characteristics and climatic conditions during plant development since these were harvested in different locations [20]. A similar behavior is observed for Forastero IMC-67 samples that were collected in intervals of two crop cycles per year (Figure 6 b). Once again, conditions as climate, the amount of sunshine and rainfall, temperature, soil conditions, ripening, and post-harvesting practices directly affected the amino acids composition [31].
Roasting of cocoa is an essential step for the chocolate flavor development. At this stage, the Maillard's reaction takes place, involving free amino acids, peptides, and reducing sugars [32, 33]. Figure 5 also shows a significant decrease of free amino acids during roasting, being greater for the hydrophobic ones. Voigt et al. [2] reported that the hydrophobic amino acids leucine, alanine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine, released by proteinase activities in fermentation, are important contributors, as well as the reducing sugars fructose and glucose derived from sucrose hydrolysis [4, 34]. This behavior has been associated to a significant increase in pyrazines after roasting, which are the compounds responsible for cocoa flavor intensity.
In this research, a comparative study between the free amino acid profile (last day of fermentation and roasting) and the content of pyrazines obtained was conducted, according to the procedure reported by Brunetto et al [35]. Figure 7 shows the amino acids content generated during the fermentation and their decrease due to their transformation into pyrazines. Furthermore, among the analyzed Venezuelan cocoas, the amino acids behavior in Porcelana variety can be highlighted, since an important decrease of hydrophobic amino acids can be observed as well as a significant increase in pyrazine content during roasting stage, similar to the behavior observes on the Forastero variety. Several researchers confirm that free amino acids act as substrate in the formation of pyrazines [9, 36]. Therefore, pyrazines levels can be used as an index of the roasting process [37].
Conclusions
The obtained results have proved that the developed reversed-phase HPLC method with PTC-AA DAD is a useful tool for primary and secondary amino acids determination in cocoa samples. Amino acids extraction from cocoa samples with water in an ultrasonic bath at 70 °C provided a satisfactory extraction efficiency with recoveries higher than 89%. The pre-column amino acids derivatization time was significantly reduced using microwave radiation. Besides, exploiting a column-switching system with an OASIS pre-column allowed the efficient and fast cleaning of PTC-AA extract, thereby reducing matrix interferences. Different validation parameters showed that with the developed method rapid and highly reproducible results can be obtained.
The proposed method was successfully applied for the evaluation of amino acids content in Trinitario, Forastero, and Criollo cocoa samples grown in different seasons of the year. All the analyzed samples had a significant content of free amino acids, ranging from 3.87 to 5.97 g kg-1 in the absence of fermentation. In general, amino acid degradation was observed on the first day of fermentation, whereas some samples showed progressive increase as the fermentation process carried on, with a predominance of hydrophobic amino acids such as leucine, phenylalanine, valine, alanine, and isoleucine. Moreover, during the roasting step a fraction of the amino acids, especially the hydrophobic ones, is partially degraded by the Maillard's reaction to form the compounds associated with the aroma and flavor of cocoa.