SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.37 issue2Ergonomics in digestive endoscopy: Prevalence, types of musculoskeletal disorders, and risk factors in endoscopists in ColombiaThe behavior of liver diseases in a cohort of Colombian patients with COVID-19 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología

Print version ISSN 0120-9957On-line version ISSN 2500-7440

Rev. colomb. Gastroenterol. vol.37 no.2 Bogotá Jan./June 2022  Epub Aug 24, 2022

https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.838 

Original article

Incidence and characterization of colorectal adenomas in the area of influence of a specialized institution

Luis Fernando Roldán-Molina1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9244-6733

Sandra Milena León-Ramírez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0432-024X

Lina María Roldán-Delfino1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2581-5882

Sara Márquez-Molina1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4559-8176

Edilberto Elías Núñez-Cabarcas1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0360-9562

Hilda María Pérez-Useche1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1442-2928

Antonio José Restrepo-Peláez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-2204

Carlos Ever Restrepo-Tirado1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1854-1978

María Adelaida Saffon-Abad1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1730-6340

Julio Eduardo Zuleta-Muñoz1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1251-6656

Juan Nicolás Zuluaga-Aguilar1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7070-2698

1Instituto Gastroclínico S. A. S. Medellín, Colombia.


Abstract

Aim:

To locate and characterize colorectal adenomas endoscopically and histologically in a cohort of patients undergoing colonoscopy in Medellín, Colombia.

Materials and methods:

Descriptive cross-sectional study. We included patients older than 18 years who underwent colonoscopy between February and July 2020 at a specialized center in Medellín, Colombia. We determined the incidence of adenomas, their location in different segments of the colon, their endoscopic and histological characteristics, and cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD).

Results:

992 colonoscopies were performed, finding colorectal polyps in 266 patients, of which 208 had adenomas. We resected 461 polyps, of which 336 were adenomas (72 %). The histological type with the highest representation was tubular (78 %). The location of adenomas was 37 % in the right colon, 25 % in the transverse colon, and 38 % in the left colon. CRC cases were nine per 1,000 patients, including advanced carcinoma and carcinoma in situ (HGD).

Conclusions:

Given the incidence of adenomas in the right and transverse colon, rectosigmoidoscopy is discouraged as a screening study for CRC. Tubular adenomas, sessile in appearance and tiny, predominated in the population studied. We recommend screening in the population over 40 years of age and the search for precursor lesions as strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality rates due to CRC.

Keywords: Colonoscopy; colorectal adenomas; colorectal cancer

Resumen

Objetivo:

localización y caracterización endoscópica e histológica de los adenomas colorrectales en una cohorte de pacientes sometidos a colonoscopia en Medellín, Colombia.

Materiales y métodos:

estudio descriptivo de corte transversal. Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 18 años sometidos a colonoscopia entre febrero y julio de 2020 en un centro especializado de Medellín, Colombia. Se determinó la incidencia de adenomas, su localización en los diferentes segmentos del colon, sus características endoscópicas e histológicas, así como también los casos de cáncer colorrectal (CCR) y displasia de alto grado.

Resultados:

se realizaron 992 colonoscopias y se encontraron pólipos colorrectales en 266 pacientes, de los cuales 208 tenían adenomas. En total se resecaron 461 pólipos, de los cuales 336 fueron adenomas (72 %). El tipo histológico con mayor representación fue el tubular (78 %). La localización de adenomas fue del 37 % en el colon derecho, 25 % en el transverso y 38 % en el colon izquierdo. La cantidad de casos de CCR fue de 9 por 1000 pacientes, que incluyen carcinoma avanzado y carcinoma in situ (DAG).

Conclusiones:

dada la incidencia de adenomas en el colon derecho y transverso, no se recomienda la rectosigmoidoscopia como estudio de tamizaje para CCR. En la población estudiada fueron predominantes los adenomas tubulares, de aspecto sésil y tamaño diminuto. Se recomienda el tamizaje en la población mayor de 40 años y la búsqueda de lesiones precursoras como estrategias para disminuir las tasas de morbimortalidad por CCR.

Palabras clave: Colonoscopia; adenomas colorrectales; cáncer colorrectal

Introduction

The prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) is an objective of public health in different countries worldwide. Primary prevention includes modifying risk factors in the lifestyle and diet of patients. In contrast, secondary prevention focuses on the surveillance and follow-up of patients with an average or high risk of developing the disease, such as 50 years of age or older, family history of CRC, familial adenomatous polyposis, or inflammatory bowel disease1.

Carcinogenesis in CRC is a process that can take years and, therefore, allows identifying cancer precursor lesions that, when resected, would reduce the risk of developing the disease. There must be easy access to diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy programs.

The present study aims to describe the findings of a cohort of patients undergoing colonoscopy regarding the location and endoscopic and histological characterization of colorectal adenomas.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in a gastroenterology institution in Medellín, Colombia, between February and July 2020. All outpatients over 18 years of age admitted for colonoscopy after signing the informed consent were included consecutively.

A database was built from demographic, endoscopic, and histologic data obtained from colonoscopy and pathology reports. The study variables were age, sex, the scope of the examination, assessment of the quality of colon preparation using the Boston scale, endoscopic result, histological result, type of polyp, number of resected polyps, location of the polyps, aspect, size, presence of dysplasia, and presence of adenocarcinoma.

A total of 992 colonoscopies were performed in the study period by a team of seven gastroenterologists and interpreted by a group of two pathologists with training in gastrointestinal histopathology.

The colonoscopes used are high definition, with different light filters such as LCI (linked color imaging), BLI (blue light imaging), and NBI (narrow-band imaging) and magnification for lesion characterization. Polyp resection was performed with biopsy forceps or polypectomy snare, depending on the lesion size. The size of the lesion was estimated by comparing the polyp with the fully open biopsy forceps (7 mm in length) or the polypectomy snare (15 and 30 mm in diameter)2) and classified according to the following criteria: minute (up to 5 mm), small (6-9 mm), and large (≥ 10 mm)3.

The findings in the endoscopic report describe the size, quantity, and aspect of the resected polyps according to their location by colon segments. According to the Paris Classification, the endoscopic element was not included in the analysis.

A complete histological study of the polyps was performed, which were deposited in 10% buffered formalin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to diagnose the histological type of each polyp (adenomatous, non-adenomatous), determine the grade of dysplasia according to the Vienna classification4, and classify the adenoma according to its architecture as serrated, tubular, tubulovillous, or villous5.

The institutional ethics committee approved the study, considering it without risk since no intentional intervention or modification of the biological, physiological, psychological, or social variables of the individuals who participated in the study was carried out. In turn, it contemplates the fundamental principles of research ethics following the Declaration of Helsinki version 20136 and the provisions of Resolution 008430/1993 issued by the Ministry of Health of Colombia7.

Statistical analysis

The descriptive analysis of the population was carried out with the programs Excel version 2010 and Jamovi version 1.2.25. Absolute and relative frequencies were determined for qualitative variables and measures of central tendency and dispersion for quantitative variables. The chi-square association test was used for independent samples, estimating the odds ratio (OR) with its appropriate 95% confidence interval (CI). A statistically significant p-value < 0.05 was considered.

Results

Data were obtained from the reports of 992 consecutive patients who underwent complete colonoscopy between February and July 2020 at a third referral gastroenterology institution in Medellín, Colombia. All patients included in the study met the criteria of the entire examination scope, the Boston scale result to assess the quality of colon preparation, and the measurement of colonoscope withdrawal time (≥ 6 minutes).

Sixty-one percent of the population with colorectal polyps are women, and the average age was 52.8 years, with a standard deviation of 14.7. The age range oscillated between 18 and 89 years. Demographic and follow-up variables are described in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic information and characterization of adenomas 

Variable n (%)
Sex
- Female 602 (61)
- Male 390 (39)
Age range
- < 40 8 (3,8)
- 40-49 25 (12)
- 50-59 70 (33,7)
- 60-69 60 (28,8)
- 70-79 33 (15,9)
- > 80 12 (5,8)
Location
- Rectum 39 (11,6)
- Sigmoid 56 (16,7)
- Descending 33 (9,8)
- Transverse 83 (24,7)
- Ascending 96 (28,6)
- Cecum 29 (8,6)
Size
- ≤ 5 mm (minute) 240 (71)
- 6-9 mm (small) 60 (18)
- ≥ 10 mm (large) 36 (11)
Aspect
- Flat 19 (6)
- Sessile 287 (85)
- Pedunculated 24 (7)
- Lump 6 (2)
Dysplasia grade
- LGD 327 (97,3)
- HGD 5 (1,5)
- Adenocarcinoma 4 (1,2)

Five main indications for colonoscopy were identified: screening for CRC (47%), gastrointestinal symptoms (33%), personal history of polyps (15%), family history of CRC (3%), and positive fecal occult blood (2%). A greater indication for colonoscopy due to gastrointestinal symptoms was identified in women (OR: 1.36; 95%CI: 1.03-1.79; p = 0.029) and a personal history of polyps in men (OR: 1.72; 95%CI: 1.20-2.47, p = 0.003).

Two hundred sixty-six patients with colorectal polyps and 461 resected polyps were identified, characterizing 125 (27%) as non-adenomatous polyps (Table 2). In 32% of patients, more than one adenoma was resected.

Table 2 Histological type and location of polyps 

Right colon Transverse colon Left colon Overall, n (%)
Adenoma
- Serrated 17 7 38 62 (18)
- Tubular 105 73 84 262 (78)
- Tubulovillous 3 2 5 10 (3)
- Indeterminate 0 1 1 2 (1)
- Overall, n (%) 125 (37) 83 (25) 128 (38) 336 (100)
Polyp
- Inflammatory 0 3 4 7 (6)
- Hyperplastic 20 17 81 118 (94)
- Overall, n (%) 20 (16) 20 (16) 85 (68) 125 (100)

The content of this article focuses on the characterization of adenomatous polyps. Adenoma detection was 21% (208 patients with adenomas out of 992 patients evaluated). In these 208 patients, 336 adenomas were resected. The most common macroscopic aspect was sessile (85%) and flat or pedunculated lesions to a lesser extent. Six mass-type lesions (2%) were identified: adenocarcinomas or adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Of the resected lesions, 71% were categorized as minute (less than 5 mm), 18% small, and 11% large. One minute adenoma with HGD and eight larger advanced lesions were found.

The location of the adenomas was in the ascending (37%) and transverse (25%) colon. There were no statistically significant differences in the detection of adenomas between the right and left colon (Table 2).

Regarding the histopathology of the resected adenomas, three different types were identified (serrated, tubular, and tubulovillous); 97% had low-grade dysplasia. We observed that the predominant histological type is tubular (78%), followed by the serrated type (18%). No villous adenomas were identified (Table 2).

Four new cases of CRC and five cases of HGD (considered carcinoma in situ) were obtained. In the case of these nine patients, five were men and four women, with a mean age at diagnosis of 69 years.

No cases of CRC or HGD were found in the studied population’s rectum or descending colon.

Discussion

A polyp is a visible protrusion that may develop on the surface of the colon or rectum. When it comes to an adenoma, it derives from the glandular epithelium and may have different grades of dysplasia or histological characteristics associated with a potential increase in malignancy8,9; therefore, they are widely known as precursor lesions of CRC. For its part, adenocarcinoma is an adenomatous lesion that invades the mucosa and whose transformation to a high grade of dysplasia and invasive carcinoma requires around ten years of evolution10. Characterizing the number, size, and histology of adenomas makes it possible to determine adequate follow-up periods11 that minimize the risk of advanced or interval CRC in the population concerned.

Colonoscopy screening has effectively reduced CRC mortality and prevented 60%-80% of incident lesions due to adenoma resection12. In most cases, polypectomy was the procedure of choice for resection. However, some situations typical of the examination could have inadvertently affected the detection of adenomas, such as inadequate intestinal cleaning of the entire colon; polyps unnoticed by their size or appearance (minute or flat); CRC that does not follow the adenoma-carcinoma sequence or particularly aggressive precursor lesions that transform from adenoma to carcinoma in a shorter period13.

In the examinations carried out on women, there was a more significant indication for colonoscopy due to gastrointestinal symptoms (65%). Of note is that the clinical symptoms most strongly suggest CRC are rectal bleeding and weight loss14 and that, generally, colorectal polyps are rarely accompanied by symptoms before progressing to CRC, except for some occasional abnormalities in the stool15. In our population, a higher incidence of adenomas was found in men, and the male sex is an established risk factor for colorectal adenomas16.

Of the 208 patients with adenomas, 12% were 40-49 years old, suggesting the need to start CRC screening earlier for detection and resection of precursor lesions17.

The prevalence of adenomas in the average risk population is between 10% and 20%18. In our case, it was 25%, corresponding to patients over 50 years of age with no pathology or history of associated risk in whom at least one colorectal adenoma was resected.

As for the location of adenomas, other authors reported no differences between the right and left colon11, which matches the findings in the present study. Additionally, by identifying that 62% of all resected adenomas were obtained between the right and transverse colon, performing rectosigmoidoscopy in patients screened for CRC is not considered relevant.

Size is a significant risk factor for advanced adenomas10; those ≥ 2 cm are considered difficult to remove entirely for various reasons: visualization is limited, the borders are difficult to identify, and there is a higher risk of bleeding19. Four advanced adenomas not resected due to their large size were identified in the study population. Regarding those of minute size, an adenoma was resected with HGD, corresponding to 0.3%. The proportion of minute adenomas with HGD differs between studies, reporting values of less than 1% and between 3% and 4%3,20. This finding suggests resecting all adenomas regardless of their size (minute or small); depending on the grade of dysplasia, the risk of progressing to CRC increases, and cases of flat, minute or depressed lesions can also be carcinomas21. No complications such as perforation or bleeding were associated with the polypectomy procedure.

Nineteen flat-appearing adenomas (6%) were identified, a low percentage but predictable given the difficulty in detecting them; in Japan, the incidence of flat adenomas is between 8% and 40%22. Sessile adenomas can also represent technical difficulties for resection due to their proximity to the submucosa. In these cases, when performing the resection, the increased risk of bleeding or perforation is inherent19.

Most of the adenomas studied had low-grade dysplasia and tubular histology and were resected with the hot or cold loop forceps technique23. Lesion detection and characterization were optimized using high-definition equipment with white light and virtual chromoendoscopy, so it was possible to differentiate an adenoma from a hyperplastic polyp with greater than 90% certainty20.

In Colombia, CRC ranks fifth in cancer incidence, with 12 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. In the study population, the incidence was much higher, reaching nine cases per 1,000 patients, because the diagnosis was made in a referral center for digestive diseases24.

Conclusions

Given the incidence of adenomas in the right and transverse colon, rectosigmoidoscopy is not recommended as a screening study for CRC. Tubular adenomas, sessile in appearance and diminutive in size, predominated in the population studied. Screening in the population over 40 years and searching for precursor lesions are advisable as strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality rates due to CRC.

References

1. Roncucci L, Mariani F. Prevention of colorectal cancer: How many tools do we have in our basket? Eur J Intern Med. 2015;26(10):752-6. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2015.08.019Links ]

2. Zhou L, Zhang H, Sun S, Huang M, Liu J, Xu D, Song M, Sun C, Li H, Zheng D, Fan Y, Liao Y, Wang P, Wu J. Clinical, endoscopic and pathological characteristics of colorectal polyps in elderly patients: Single-center experience. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017;7(1):81-87. https://www.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1284Links ]

3. Matsuda T, Kawano H, Hisabe T, Ikematsu H, Kobayashi N, Mizuno K, et al. Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of diminutive colorectal polyps. Dig Endosc. 2014;26 Suppl 2:104-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/den.12281Links ]

4. Shaukat A, Kaltenbach T, Dominitz JA, Robertson DJ, Anderson JC, Cruise M, et al. Endoscopic Recognition and Management Strategies for Malignant Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(5):1916-1934.e2. https://www.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.050Links ]

5. Arévalo F, Aragón V, Alva J, Perez Narrea M, Cerrillo G, Montes P, et al. Pólipos colorectales: actualización en el diagnóstico. Rev Gastroenterol Perú. 2012;32(2):123-33. [ Links ]

6. Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM - Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos [Internet]. Universidad de Navarra; 2013 [consultado el 12 de mayo de 2021]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.redsamid.net/archivos/201606/2013-declaracion-helsinki-brasil.pdf?1Links ]

7. Resolución número 8430 de 1993, por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud [Internet]. Ministerio de Salud de Colombia; 1993 [consultado el el 12 de mayo de 2021]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDFLinks ]

8. Gil Parada FL, Torres Amaya M, Riveros Santoya SV, Castaño Llano R, Ibáñez H, Huertas Quintero MM, et al. Guía de práctica clínica para la tamización de cáncer colorrectal. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol. 2015;30(2). [ Links ]

9. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002;12(1):1-9, v. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/s1052-5157(03)00053-9Links ]

10. Gschwantler M, Kriwanek S, Langner E, Göritzer B, Schrutka-Kölbl C, Brownstone E, et al. High-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: a multivariate analysis of the impact of adenoma and patient characteristics. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14(2):183-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/00042737-200202000-00013Links ]

11. Toll AD, Fabius D, Hyslop T, Pequignot E, DiMarino AJ, Infantolino A, et al. Prognostic significance of high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(4):370-3. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02385.xLinks ]

12. Paggi S, Radaelli F, Repici A, Hassan C. Advances in the removal of diminutive colorectal polyps. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;9(2):237-44. https://www.doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2014.950955Links ]

13. Nagorni A, Bjelakovic G, Petrovic B. Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD008361. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008361.pub2Links ]

14. Adelstein BA, Macaskill P, Chan SF, Katelaris PH, Irwig L. Most bowel cancer symptoms do not indicate colorectal cancer and polyps: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:65. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-11-65Links ]

15. Chu Y, Zhang J, Wang P, Li T, Jiang S, Zhao Q, et al. Will purposely seeking detect more colorectal polyps than routine performing during colonoscopy? Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(42):e22738. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022738Links ]

16. Klare P, Ascher S, Hapfelmeier A, Wolf P, Beitz A, Schmid RM, von Delius S. Patient age and duration of colonoscopy are predictors for adenoma detection in both proximal and distal colon. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(2):525-32. https://www.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.525Links ]

17. Hemmasi G, Sohrabi M, Zamani F, Ajdarkosh H, Rakhshani N, Khoonsari M, et al. Prevalence of colorectal adenoma in an average-risk population aged 40-50 versus 50-60 years. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015;24(5):386-90. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000097Links ]

18. Søreide K, Nedrebø BS, Reite A, Thorsen K, Kørner H. Endoscopy, morphology, morphometry and molecular markers: predicting cancer risk in colorectal adenoma. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009;9(2):125-37. https://www.doi.org/10.1586/14737159.9.2.125Links ]

19. Angarita FA, Feinberg AE, Feinberg SM, Riddell RH, McCart JA. Management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(2):115-129. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2950-1Links ]

20. Schoefl R, Ziachehabi A, Wewalka F. Small colorectal polyps. Dig Dis. 2015;33(1):38-41. https://www.doi.org/10.1159/000366034Links ]

21. Tanaka S, Saitoh Y, Matsuda T, Igarashi M, Matsumoto T, Iwao Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(3):252-60. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-014-1021-4Links ]

22. Speake D, Biyani D, Frizelle FA, Watson AJ. Flat adenomas. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(1-2):4-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03847.xLinks ]

23. Pommergaard HC, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J, Raskov H. The association between location, age and advanced colorectal adenoma characteristics: a propensity-matched analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017;52(1):1-4. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2016.1218929Links ]

24. Lindberg LJ, Ladelund S, Bernstein I, Therkildsen C, Nilbert M. Risk of Synchronous and Metachronous Colorectal Cancer: Population-Based Estimates in Denmark with Focus on Non-Hereditary Cases Diagnosed After Age 50. Scand J Surg. 2019;108(2):152-158. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1457496918798212Links ]

Citation: Roldán-Molina LF, León-Ramírez SM, Roldán-Delfino LM, Márquez-Molina S, Núñez-Cabarcas EE, Pérez-Useche HM, Restrepo-Peláez AJ, Restrepo-Tirado CE, Saffon-Abad MA, Zuleta-Muñoz JE, Zuluaga-Aguilar JN. Incidence and characterization of colorectal adenomas in the area of influence of a specialized institution. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol. 2022;37(2):187-192. https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.838

Received: October 07, 2021; Accepted: February 21, 2022

*Correspondence: Luis Fernando Roldán-Molina. Mail: lf.roldan@gastroclinico.com.co

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License