Introduction
Streblidae and Nycteribiidae are highly specialized families of dipteran, which feed exclusively on bat blood (Wenzel et al., 1966). Most species in these families are ectoparasites, except for females within the genus Ascodipteron, which live inside their host’s skin (Wenzel et al., 1966; Dick & Patterson, 2006; Dittmar et al., 2006). Several studies have found that at a given site, 71-88% of these bat flies species are host-specific (Wenzen et al., 1966; ter Hofstede et al., 2004; Dick & Gettinger, 2005; Dick, 2007; de Vasconcelos et al., 2016; Urbieta et al., 2019). However, some species are widely distributed and have been recorded on several hosts (e.g., Paratrichobius longicrus [Urbieta et al., 2019], and some species of Trichobius and Strebla [de Vasconcelos et al., 2016]), but never outside their primary host’s distribution, and commonly within closely related species or a particular clade (Dick & Patterson, 2006). Although some authors have proposed that registered polyxenic species (i.e., parasite several hosts) may be the result of inappropriate handling (Dick, 2007), natural factors may also cause this, such as species mobility (Marshall, 1981), habitat quality (e.g., Urbieta et al., 2019), or the absence of the primary host (Dick et al., 2009).
Morphology within this group is variable: wings can be normal, reduced or absent; eyes can or cannot be present; the body is laterally or dorsally compressed; and the legs can be short and strong or long and thin (Beloto et al., 2005). These species are adenotrophic viviparous; only one larva develops inside the female and feeds on secretions from the accessory glands, which are highly specialized. Eventually, the third-instar larva is deposited as a sessile prepupa in a substrate (Overal, 1980; Fritz, 1983). The pupa forms and remains in this state for at least four weeks; then, the adult emerges and proceeds to locate its new host.
Streblidae are distributed worldwide and include 5 subfamilies, 33 genera, and at least 239 species; like its hosts, this family has pantropical distribution. While the subfamilies Ascodipterinae and Brachytarsininae are restricted to the Old World, Nycterophiliinae, Streblinae, and Trichobiinae are confined to the New World, with a higher species and host richness (Dick & Patterson, 2006; Morse et al., 2013). Vast literature has been published on the taxonomy of this group, particularly in America (Wenzel et al., 1966; Wenzel, 1976; Guerrero, 1993; 1994a; 1994b; 1995a; 1995b; 1996; 1997; Autino et al., 1999; 2000; Graciolli & Carvalho, 2001; Dick & Gettinger, 2005; Dick & Miller, 2010). However, this group is considered paraphyletic (Dittmar et al., 2006), and few information on phylogenetic relationships exists (Dittmar et al., 2006).
In Colombia, 73 species have been recorded by Bequaert (1940), Tamsitt & Fox (1970), Marinkelle & Grosse (1981), Guerrero (1997), Dick et al. (2016), and in the Field Museum of Natural History database lists (http://emuweb.fieldmuseum.org). However, lists of species occurring in tropical dry forest are lacking in the literature (Calonge-Camargo & Pérez-Torres, 2018; Durán et al., 2017; Tarquino-Carbonell et al., 2015). The goal of this research was to update the information on several species of Streblidae, contributing to the biological inventory in this ecosystem, which is critically endangered in Colombia (Arango et al., 2003; Arcila et al., 2012), and providing insights on their ecology.
Study Area
This study was carried out in the vereda El Carbonero, Santander de Quilichao, in northern Cauca department, Colombia (02° 59' 9.6'' N, 76° 28' 44.4'' W and 02° 59' 27.6'' N, 76° 28' 30.0'' W). Two tropical dry forest fragments were sampled near the western slope of the Andean Central Cordillera, at 1132-1174 m a.s.l. The fragments are surrounded by bushy vegetation, and low pastures for cattle; human intervention such as deforestation, use of river water, and hunting, take place in the area.
Method
Both forest fragments were sampled during 16 visits between April and November 2012. Sampling during each event spanned 12 hours (from 18:00 to 06:00h), and consisted of 8 mist nets 12 m long by 3 m high, which were revised at one-hour intervals. Sampling effort was 1536 net-hours and 4608 m2 of total studied area, equally divided within the two fragments (768 net-hours and 2304 m2 per fragment).
Ectoparasites were visually sought (by active in-fur searching), and specimens were collected and preserved in 90% ethanol for further identification. Bats were identified following Gardner (2007) and Díaz et al. (2016) species keys. Ectoparasites were identified using the keys in Wenzel et al. (1966), Wenzel (1976), and Guerrero (1993, 1994a, 1994b, 1995a, 1995b, 1996). All specimens were placed in the Museo de Entomología de la Universidad del Valle (MUSENUV). Host and distribution information was compiled from Guerrero (1997), Graciolli & Carvalho (2001), Dick et al. (2016) and the ectoparasite database of The Field Museum of Natural History.
Using field data, we constructed an interaction matrix, with bat species in rows and streblids in columns. Cells in this matrix were filled with the number of individuals collected from any given bat species, as a proxy for interaction frequency. Then we calculated the interaction exclusiveness index H’ 2 (Blüthgen et al., 2006). This index varies from 0.0 (generalized interactions) to 1.0 (specialized interactions), providing information on interaction specialization at community level. The significance of this index, i.e. whether the observed specialization could be explained by chance alone, was assessed by generating 1000 random matrices with the Patefield (1981) model and using as P value the proportion of these matrices with H’ 2 higher than the observed matrix. This analysis was performed using the bipartite (Dormann et al., 2009) package of R (R Core Team, 2014).
Results
We recorded ten species of streblids on seven different bat species. From these, eight streblid species are new records for Cauca department, and particularly for the highly endangered tropical dry forest. The flies Exastinion clovisi and Anastrebla modestini were recorded for the first time parasitizing the bat Anoura carishina. We found a high and significant interaction exclusiveness (H’ 2 = 0.97, P < 0.001), indicating that streblids in our study site showed highly specialized interactions.
Streblinae
Anastrebla modestini Wenzel, 1996.Figure 1 A.
Examined specimens: A female on Anoura carishina (Phyllostomidae). Accession number: MUSENUV-28179.
Distribution: From Mexico to Brazil and Bolivia.
Colombian records: Cundinamarca, Huila, and Nariño. Other hosts recorded in Colombia: Artibeus lituratus, Enchisthenes hartii, and Sturnira erythromos (Phyllostomidae).
Other known hosts: Phyllostomidae: Anoura cultrata, A. caudifer, A. peruana, A. latidens, Carollia perspicillata, Glossophaga soricina, Lichonycteris obscura, Lionycteris spurrelli, Lonchophylla robusta.
Comments: This genus comprises five species, distributed in Central and South America. This is the most common species, and its type host is Anoura geoffroyi (Guerrero, 1997). This is the first record of Anastrebla modestini as a parasite of Anoura carishina.
Metelasmus pseudopterus Coquillett, 1907.Figure 1 B.
Examined specimens: A male on Artibeus lituratus (Phyllostomidae). Accession number: MUSENUV-28184.
Distribution: From Mexico to Argentina.
Colombian records: Meta and Putumayo. No other hosts have been recorded in Colombia.
Other known hosts: Emballonuridae: Peropteryx macrotis. Phyllostomidae: Artibeus amplus, A. fimbriatus, A. fraterculus, A. jamaicensis, A. planirostris, Enchisthenes hartii, Carollia perspicillata, C. sowelli, Chiroderma villosum, Dermanura gnoma, Glossophaga soricina, Phyllostomus discolor, P. hastatus, Platyrrhinus helleri, Uroderma magnirostrum, Vampyriscus nymphaea. Vespertilionidae: Myotis nigricans.
Comments: This genus comprises two species. The cited species presents a wide geographic distribution and low specificity; however, it is not abundant. Its most common hosts are different species of Artibeus (Graciolli & Dick, 2004; Guerrero, 1997). The type host is Artibeus lituratus (Phyllostomidae).
Trichobiinae
Aspidoptera delatorreiWenzel, 1966. Figure 1 C.
Examined specimens: A female and three males on Sturnira lilium (Phyllostomidae). Accession numbers: MUSENUV- 28180, 28181, 28182.
Distribution: From Mexico to Colombia and western Venezuela
Colombian records: Cauca, Meta, Santander, Tolima, and Valle del Cauca. Other hosts recorded in Colombia: Desmodus rotundus, Sturnira erythromos, and S. ludovici (Phyllostomidae).
Other known hosts: Mormoopidae: Pteronotus gymnonotus. Phyllostomidae: Carollia perspicillata, Dermanura tolteca, Glossophaga commissarisi, G. soricina, Phyllostomus hastatus.
Comments: The genus comprises three species, easily recognizable by its small size, short feet and small rounded wings with well-defined veins (Autino, 2000; Guerrero, 1997). Type host: Sturnira parvidens (Phyllostomidae).
Exastinion clovisi (Pessôa & Guimarães, 1936).Figure 1 D.
Examined specimens: Two females on Anoura carishina (Phyllostomidae). Accession number: MUSENUV - 28183.
Distribution: From Mexico to Venezuela and Brazil.
Colombian records: Antioquia, Cundinamarca, and Nariño. Other hosts recorded in Colombia: Artibeus sp. and Sturnira bidens (Phyllostomidae).
Other hosts: Emballonuridae: Peropteryx macrotis. Mormoopidae: Pteronotus parnellii. Natalidae: Natalus stramineus. Phyllostomidae: Anoura cultrata, A. geoffroyi, A. peruana, A. latidens, Artibeus jamaicensis, Glossophaga soricina, Leptonycteris sp., Sturnira lilium.
Comments: This genus comprises three species, all of which parasitize bats in the genus Anoura (Dick & Graciolli, 2013; Guerrero, 1997). Type host: Anoura caudifer (Phyllostomidae). This is the first record of Exastion clovisi as a parasite of Anoura carishina.
Megistopoda aranea (Coquillet, 1899).Figure 1 E.
Examined specimens: A male on Artibeus lituratus (Phyllostomidae). Accession number: MUSENUV - 28186.
Distribution: From Mexico to Argentina.
Colombian records: Cundinamarca, Tolima, Valle del Cauca, and Vichada. Other hosts recorded in Colombia: Artibeus jamaicensis, Platyrrhinus spp., and Sturnira lilium (Phyllostomidae).
Other hosts: Noctilionidae: Noctilio leporinus. Phyllostomidae: Artibeus fimbriatus, A. fraterculus, A. hirsutus, A. intermedius, A. lituratus, A. obscurus, A. planirostris, Brachyphylla cavernarum, Carollia castanea, C. perspicillata, Chiroderma villosum, Chrotopterus auritus, Dermanura anderseni, Dermanura cinerea, Desmodus rotundus, Diphylla ecaudata, Glossophaga longirostris, G. soricina, Lonchorhina aurita, Lophostoma silvicola, Monophyllus redmani, Phylloderma stenops, Phyllostomus discolor, P. hastatus, Platyrrhinus lineatus, P. vittatus, Sturnira ludovici, Trachops cirrhosus, Uroderma bilobatum, Vampyressa bidens, V. pusilla. Vespertilionidae: Myotis sp.
Comments: The genus Megistopoda includes three described species, widely distributed along the Neotropics. However, its taxonomy is hazy, due to morphological variation within populations (Dick & Graciolli, 2013; Guerrero, 1997). M. aranea is one of the most common species in the genus. Type host: Unknown.
Megistopoda proxima (Seguy, 1926).Figure 1F.
Examined specimens: Five females and four males on Sturnira lilium (Phyllostomidae). Accession numbers: MUSENUV - 28187, 28188, 28189, 28190, 28191.
Distribution: From Mexico to Argentina; West Indies.
Colombian records: Cauca, Nariño, Putumayo, Santander, Tolima, and Valle del Cauca. Other hosts recorded in Colombia: Carollia perspicillata, Chiroderma spp., and Platyrrhinus dorsalis (Phyllostomidae).
Other hosts: Noctilionidae: Noctilio leporinus. Mormoopidae: Pteronotus parnellii. Phyllostomidae: Artibeus fimbriatus, A. hirsutus, A. jamaicensis, A. lituratus, A. obscurus, Carollia perspicillata, Chiroderma villosum, Dermanura cinerea, D. phaeotis, Desmodus rotundus, Enchisthenes hartii, Glossophaga commissarisi, G. soricina, Leptonycteris curasoae, Lonchorhina aurita, Macrotus waterhousii, Phylloderma stenops, Phyllostomus discolor, P. hastatus, Platyrrhinus helleri, P. lineatus, P. umbratus, Sturnira bidens, S. erythromos, S. parvidens, S. ludovici, S. mordax, S. oporaphilum, S. tildae, Uroderma bilobatum, U. magnirostrum.
Comments: As is common in the genus, this species presents a wide morphological variation in chaetotaxy, wings, and postgonites. They parasite mostly Sturnira spp. (Dick & Graciolli, 2013; Guerrero, 1997). Type host: Unknown
Paratrichobius longicrus (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1907).Figure 1G.
Examined specimens: 21 females and 28 males in Artibeus lituratus (Phyllostomidae). Accession numbers: MUSENUV - 28185, 28192, 28193, 28194, 28195, 28196, 28197, 28198, 28199, 28200, 28201, 28202, 28203, 28204, 28205, 28206, 28207, 28208, 28209, 28210, 28211.
Distribution: From Mexico to Argentina.
Colombian records: Antioquia, Cundinamarca, Huila, Meta, Nariño, Norte de Santander, Putumayo, Santander, Tolima and Valle del Cauca. Other hosts recorded in Colombia: Artibeus jamaicensis and Phyllostomus elongatus (Phyllostomidae).
Other hosts: Molossidae: Cynomops planirostris, Molossops temminckii, Tadarida brasiliensis. Noctilionidae: Noctilio albiventris. Phyllostomidae: Artibeus concolor, A. fimbriatus, A. intermedius, A. lituratus, Dermanura azteca, D. cinerea, D. tolteca, Enchisthenes hartii, Carollia perspicillata, Desmodus rotundus, Mesophylla macconnelli, Glossophaga soricina, Phyllostomus hastatus, Platyrrhinus aurarius, P. brachycephalus, P. dorsalis, P. lineatus, P. umbratus, P. vittatus, Pygoderma bilabiatum, Sturnira lilium, S. ludovici, S. oporaphilum, Uroderma bilobatum.
Comments: The genus comprises six described species and probably more to be described. Due to its taxonomical complexity, as a result of population variation, this group requires a detailed revision. Therefore, P. longicrus has been suggested as a species complex (Graciolli et al., 2001; Guerrero, 1997). Type host: Artibeus jamaicensis (Phyllostomidae).
Trichobius costalimai Guimarães, 1938.Figure 1 H.
Examined specimens: Three females and five males on Phyllostomus discolor (Phyllostomidae). Accession numbers: MUSENUV - 28220, 28221, 28222, 28223.
Distribution: From Guatemala to Brazil and Bolivia.
Colombian records: Chocó, Cundinamarca, Meta, and Tolima. Other hosts registered for the country: Artibeus lituratus, Carollia perspicillata (Phyllostomidae), and Molossus bondae (Molossidae).
Other hosts: Phyllostomidae: Anoura geoffroyi, Artibeus jamaicensis, Carollia perspicillata, Chrotopterus auritus, Desmodus rotundus, Phyllostomus discolor, P. hastatus, Sphaeronycteris toxophyllum, Sturnira lilium, S. ludovici, Tonatia bidens. Vespertilionidae: Myotis nesopolus.
Comments: This is the richest genus of Streblidae; it is divided in nine groups (Dick & Graciolli, 2013; Guerrero, 1994b). Trichobius costalimai is one of the most abundant and widely distributed species; it belongs to the longipes complex, and its usual host is P. discolor (Guerrero, 1994b). Type host: Unknown.
Trichobius joblingiWenzel, 1966. Figure 1I.
Examined specimens: Five females and a male on Carollia castanea. Two males on Carollia perspicillata; a male on Phyllostomus discolor (Phyllostomidae). Accession numbers: MUSENUV - 28213, 28214, 28215, 28216, 28217, 28218.
Distribution: From Mexico to Brazil and Paraguay.
Colombian records: Antioquia, Bolívar, Córdoba, Cundinamarca, Huila, Meta, Nariño, Norte de Santander, Putumayo, Santander, Tolima, Valle del Cauca, and Vaupés. Other hosts recorded in Colombia: Artibeus jamaicensis, A. lituratus, Phyllostomus elongatus, P. dorsalis, Desmodus rotundus, Glossophaga soricina, Sturnira lilium (Phyllostomidae), Natalus tumidirostris (Natalidae), Molossus molossus (Molossidae), Myotis nigricans (Vespertilionidae) and Rhynchonycteris naso (Emballonuridae).
Other hosts: Emballonuridae: Saccopteryx bilineata. Molossidae: Molossus ater, M. molossus. Mormoopidae: Pteronotus parnellii. Natalidae: Natalus stramineus. Noctilionidae: Noctilio leporinus. Phyllostomidae: Anoura caudifer, A. geoffroyi, Artibeus fimbriatus, A. fuliginosus, A. intermedius, A. lituratus, A. obscurus, Enchisthenes hartii, Carollia brevicauda, C. sowelli, C. subrufa, Chiroderma villosum, Choeroniscus sp., Dermanura anderseni, D. phaeotis, D. watsoni, Glossophaga commissarisi, G. leachii, G. longirostris, G. soricina, Lampronycteris brachyotis, Lonchophylla robusta, Lonchorhina aurita, Lophostoma silvicola, Macrophyllum macrophyllum, Micronycteris brachyotis, M. hirsutus, M. megalotis, M. minuta, Mimon cozumelae, Phyllostomus hastatus, P. latifolius, P. dorsalis, Platyrrhinus helleri, Rhinophylla pumilio, Sturnira erythromos, S. lilium, S. parvidens, S. ludovici, S. tildae, Trachops cirrhosus, Trinycteris nicefori, Uroderma bilobatum, Vampyrodes caraccioli. Vespertilionidae: Myotis nigricans, M. ruber, Rhogeessa io.
Comments: A common and abundant species in the Neotropics. Guerrero (1995) mentions that there may be several new species within this taxon. Type host: Carollia perspicillata (Phyllostomidae).
Trichobius longipes (Rudow, l871).Figure 1 J.
Examined specimens: A male on Phyllostomus hastatus (Phyllostomidae). Accession number: MUSENUV - 28219.
Distribution: From Guatemala to Brazil and Paraguay.
Colombian records: Antioquia, Huila, Magdalena, Meta, Norte de Santander, and Valle del Cauca. Other hosts recorded in Colombia: Carollia perspicillata, Phyllostomus elongatus, Lophostoma silvicola, Vampyrum spectrum (Phyllostomidae) and Noctilio leporinus (Noctilionidae).
Other hosts: Emballonuridae: Rhynchonycteris naso. Molossidae: Molossus ater, M. rufus. Mormoopidae: Pteronotus parnellii. Phyllostomidae: Anoura geoffroyi, Artibeus jamaicensis, Choeronycteris mexicana, Desmodus rotundus, Glossophaga soricina, Phyllostomus discolor, Sturnira erythromos, S. ludovici, Uroderma bilobatum, Vampyrum spectrum.
Comments: The cited species belongs to the “longipes” complex. This species is commonly found in P. hastatus throughout its range of distribution. Type host: Phyllostomus hastatus (Phyllostomidae).
Discussion
Bat flies (Streblidae) have often been recognized as parasites with high host specificity, with each species interacting with only a few bat hosts (Dick & Patterson, 2006). This claim is consistent with the usually highly specialized interaction reported in studies from other tropical dry forests (e.g., Zarzúa-Carbajal et al., 2016; Durán et al., 2019, de Vasconcelos et al., 2016), including this one. However, it contrasts strongly with the high number of host species reported in the literature (e.g., Dick et al., 2016) for the streblids species found at our study site. As shown above, in some cases ectoparasites species have been reported from bat species in several families.
Some authors have highlighted that accidental associations due to inappropriate handling or studies based on museum skins may yield unreliable results (ter Hofstede et al., 2004; Dick, 2007). However, even when this factor is controlled, several bat fly species may naturally parasite many hosts and this varies across study sites. For example, in our study T. longipes was registered as host-specific, parasitizing only the bat P. hastatus. Yet, in other studies T. longipes has been recorded for several species (e.g., Dick et al., 2009; de Vasconcelos et al., 2016). It is likely that local factors determine whether bat flies in a given community are monoxenic or polyxenic. For instance, habitat disturbance (de Vasconcelos et al., 2016; Urbieta et al., 2019) could be related to the elimination of some natural barriers (Combes, 1991), favoring polyxenic ectoparasites and varying from one locality to the other. On the other hand, larger scale factors as a bigger fundamental niche of these parasites than what is usually attributed (Dick et al., 2009, but see Fritz [1983] for immunological discussion), and other factors as climate seasonality, vegetation type, bat behavior, and primary host absence (Dick et al., 2009; Pilosof et al., 2012; Zarzúa-Carbajal et al., 2016; Barbier & Graciolli, 2016), could filter this wide range of possible interactions. Therefore, future studies that address host-specificity at a wider scale could clarify whether this phenomenon is a matter of scale.
The Colombian tropical dry forests, for example, have been intensively disturbed by humans for a long time, due to their climate and fertility of their soil. It is estimated that from its original distribution area (80 000 km2), there is only about 8% left, being the Cauca river valley one of the most affected and vulnerable (García et al., 2014). In the case of dry forest from central and western Colombia (Valle del Cauca-Cauca), this deforestation has been drastic, preserving few fragments of 1 to 73 ha, surrounded by highly intervened matrices, formed by large extensions of crops and pastures (Armbrecht et al., 2001; Arcila et al., 2012), creating a panorama of uncertainty for the species that live there.
Colombia has a considerable bat richness, with about 198 recorded species (Solari et al., 2013). In the Cauca department, at least 103 species occur (Ramírez-Chaves & Pérez, 2010). Despite this, less than 50% of the species have been recorded as hosts of Streblidae. At least one-half of the bat flies found in this study have been recorded before in other Colombian dry forests (Tarquino et al., 2015; Durán et al., 2017; Calonge-Camargo & Pérez-Torres, 2018). However, both the most captured bat species and the most recorded bat fly differed. In our study site, the bat Artibeus lituratus and the bat-fly Paratrichobius longicrus were the most frequently recorded species interacting with each other, whereas Tarquino et al. (2015) and Calonge-Camargo & Pérez-Torres (2018), recorded Carollia perspicillata and Trichobius joblingi as the most frequently recorded bat and bat-fly species, respectively. Considering that the richness of bat flies is closely related to the richness of their hosts (Barbier & Bernard, 2017) it can also be expected that the abundance of parasites is also promoted by their host abundance.
Our study area like many other dry forest relicts in the Cauca River basin retains as considerable species richness, despite its size (Arcila et al., 2012; Montoya-Bustamante et al., 2016). In this locality, 18 species of bats have been recorded (Montoya-Bustamante et al., 2013) in which 10 species of streblids were found. On the other hand, we also observed that locally, the realized niche of these parasites is highly specialized, which does not mean that their fundamental niche also is. For this reason, larger scale studies and further sampling of bat ectoparasites are necessary, in order to better understand the ecology and diversity of streblids in Colombia. This will help to establish the relationships between different biomes and their fauna.