English (pdf)
Article in xml format
Article references
Automatic translation
Send this article by e-mail
Cited by SciELO 
Cited by Google 
Similars in
SciELO 
Similars in Google 
Permalink
Diarrhea is the third most common cause of illness in children in developing countries and accounts for about one-third of all hospitalizations among children under five years of age 1,2. Diarrhea is characterized by an increase in the number of bowel movements with excretion of soft or liquid feces. According to the period of diarrhea resolution, it can be classified as acute (up to two weeks), persistent (from two to four weeks), and chronic (episodes lasting more than four weeks) 2,3. In poor countries, diarrhea mainly affects individuals with reduced sanitation and hygiene conditions. It is often caused by infectious agents such as viruses, bacteria, or parasites, primarily transmitted through the fecal-oral route, carried by water or contaminated food 4-6.
Recently, a global pediatric diarrhea surveillance network enrolled children under five years, hospitalized with diarrhea from 28 low-income and middle-income countries, testing stool specimens by quantitative PCR for 16 infectious agents. Of the 5,465 samples tested, rotavirus was the leading cause of diarrhea (33.3%), followed by Shigella spp. (9.7%), norovirus (6.5%) and adenovirus (5.5%) 7. When considering only Central and South America, the most frequent pathogens in diarrheal disease were Shigella spp. (19.2%) and norovirus (22.2%) 7. Conversely, a molecular study conducted in Brazil showed that Escherichia coli was the leading infectious agent, detected in 71/110 (65%) children with diarrhea 8.
Inflammation due to intestinal infections may alter the microvillous architecture and physiology, leading to nutrient malabsorption, including lipids. If untreated, fat malabsorption may result in malnutrition, growth failure, and deficiencies of fat-soluble vitamins A, E, D, and K 9. Fat loss in feces can be evaluated using qualitative methods, such as SUDAN III 10 (rendering low accuracy) and quantitative or semi-quantitative tests 11. The gold standard test for fecal fat determination is the van de Kamer method, which consists of collecting the feces over 72 hours and determining the fecal fat extracted with petroleum ether. Because of the need for a high amount of fecal material, specific laboratory infrastructure, and the time-consuming protocol, the van de Kamer method use is not feasible in routine laboratories. Another method to evaluate the fat content in feces is the traditional or acid steatocrit 12. Some studies have reported its clinical applicability in the semi-quantitative assessment of steatorrhea degree in preterm infants and in several pediatric conditions, like coeliac disease, cystic fibrosis, and acute and chronic diarrhea 11-13.
This study aimed to evaluate the infectious etiology of diarrhea in hospitalized children to determine some indicators of intestinal malabsorption, and to analyze the performance of steatocrit tests (traditional and acid) in the fecal fat estimation of children with diarrhea.
Materials and methods
Study design and population
We conducted this cross-sectional study at the pediatric center of Professor Edgard Santos University Hospital and the Laboratório de Análises Clínicas of the Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil.
Children aged 0-5 years were selected by convenience sampling between 2016 and 2017 and grouped as follows: 45 inpatients with diarrheal illness (for pathogens and functional coprology evaluation) and 76 children, matched by age, exclusively for the latter comparison between traditional and acid steatocrit. The latter study sample consisted of 48 children (outpatients) with diarrhea and 28 apparently healthy children as a control group for fecal fat loss assessment. Children's families completed a questionnaire about socioeconomic and sanitation conditions, diarrhea duration, and other gastrointestinal symptoms.
Evaluation of fat, reducing substances and blood in fecal samples
The intestinal function of children with diarrhea included the steatocrit estimation for lipids detection, Benedict's reaction for reducing substances 14, and an immunochromatographic test for occult blood (Dialab® Gmbh, Wiener Neudorf, Austria). Traditional steatocrit was carried out through microcentrifugation of aqueous fecal homogenate, according to a previous report 15. The acid steatocrit method was similarly performed, except for perchloric acid addition (1/5 v/v) to the fecal homogenate 16. In this study, the steatocrit reference value was 3%, according to Cueto Rua, et al.13.
A control group for fat loss evaluation included 28 non-diarrheic children (described above in the Study design and population section), routinely seen at the Laboratório de Análises Clínicas. This group matched diarrheic patients' age and family income but lacked previous gastrointestinal diseases.
Identification of intestinal pathogens
Stool samples were analyzed using the following laboratory methods, depending to the infectious agent to be detected: a) direct examination, zinc sulfate (solution density of 1.18 g/ml), centrifugal flotation 17, sedimentation by centrifugation in water 18, and modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining 19 for helminths and protozoa diagnosis; b) ELISA for coproantigen detection of G, duodenalis, Cryptosporidium sp., and Entamoeba histolytica (Wampole II Cryptosporidium, Giardia II, and E. histolytica II, TECHLAB, Blacksburg, VA, USA); c) routine stool culture for pathogenic enterobacteria isolation, and d) rapid immunochromatographic test for rotavirus and adenovirus detection (RIDA® Quick Rotavirus / Adenovirus Combi, Germany), according to manufacturer's instructions.
Statistical analysis
We performed the statistical analysis with the GraphPad InStat program (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, California, USA). We used the chi square test to analyze frequencies of infections by enteric pathogens, intestinal malabsorption markers or injury, and steatorrhea in children discriminated by the method. For steatocrit performance, we compared the values of eliminated fat by children from diarrhea and asymptomatic groups using the Student t test. A probability value under 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethical considerations
The Research Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal da Bahia, Escola de Enfermagem, approved this study, protocol # 907.867. We sent all laboratory results to the children's parents. Participants who tested positive for pathogenic intestinal microorganisms were treated appropriately by their respective pediatricians.
Results
Evaluation of intestinal infections, other gastrointestinal symptoms, and malabsorption markers or damage in children with diarrhea
All examined children used public health services and came from low-income families, with 71.1% receiving up to one minimum Brazilian wage (around USD$ 260,00 per month), and only 26.4% of their parents had completed or were attending high school (table 1). Despite the low family income, most children (>95.0%) had basic sanitation conditions and access to piped water in their residences, which is compatible with inhabitants of urban and peri-urban areas (94.2% of residential areas).
Table 1 Demographic, socioeconomic and environmental sanitation characteristics of the studied population
| Variables | Children [n (%)] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhea* | Asymptomatic | Total | |
| 93 (76.9) | 28 (23.1) | 121 (100.0) | |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 41 (44.1) | 13 (46.4) | 54 (44.6) |
| Male | 52 (55.9) | 15 (53.6) | 67 (55.4) |
| Age (years) 0 ≤ 2 | 55 (59.1) | 14 (50.0) | 69 (57.0) |
| > 2 ≤ 5 | 38 (40.9) | 14 (50.0) | 52 (43.0) |
| Area of residence | |||
| Urban/peri-urban | 87 (93.6) | 27 (96.4) | 114 (94.2) |
| Rural | 6 (6.4) | 1 (3.6) | 7 (5.8) |
| Highest education level of the mother | |||
| None | 3 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (2.5) |
| Elementary school | 53 (57.0) | 12 (42.9) | 65 (53.7) |
| High school | 22 (23.7) | 10 (35.7) | 32 (26.4) |
| College | 15 (16.1) | 6 (21.4) | 21 (17.3) |
| Monthly income (minimum wage) | |||
| ≤ 1 | 67 (72.0) | 19 (67.9) | 86 (71.1) |
| > 1 ≤ 2 | 20 (21.5) | 7 (25.0) | 27 (22.3) |
| > 2 | 6 (6.5) | 2 (7.1) | 8 (6.6) |
| Access to water and sanitation | |||
| Piped water | 89 (95.7) | 28 (100.0) | 117 (96.7) |
| Sewage system | 89 (95.7) | 28 (100.0) | 117 (96.7) |
| Bathroom with sink | 88 (94.6) | 27 (96.4) | 115 (95.0) |
Among the 45 children hospitalized with diarrheal disease, 36 (80%) presented acute. and 9 (20%) persistent diarrhea at the time of the fecal sample collection (table 2). Of the 45 children, 18 (40.0%) were infected by enteric pathogens. Intestinal viruses predominated (15.6%), followed by protozoa (13.3%) and enterobacteria (11.1%) (table 2). Single infections by rotavirus were more frequently detected (5/7; 71.4%; p<0.05) than adenovirus (1/7; 14.3%), with one child co-infected with the two enteroviruses. The stool culture revealed five children (11.1%) positive for pathogenic enterobacteria (table 2). Most children with diarrhea diagnosed with parasitic infections had G. duodenalis (5/6; 83%; (p<0.05). Four children had single infections, and one was coinfected with E. histolytica. One child presented Blastocystis spp. in feces (table 2). We observed other symptoms besides diarrhea in infected and noninfected individuals. Among the 18 children positive for infectious agents, the cases with fever were more related to the presence of enterovirus, vomiting events to bacteria, and coughing episodes to parasitic infections (table 2).
Table 2 Enteropathogens evaluation, symptoms and markers of intestinal function and integrity in 45 hospitalized children with diarrheic illness in a pediatric hospital in Salvador, Bahia
| Children | Total | Type of diarrhea | Other symptoms | Intestinal markers of malabsorption or injury | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||||||||
| Total | 45 (100) | Acute | Persistent | Fever | Vomit | Inappetence | Cough | Hemoglobin | Lipids* | Carbohydrates | |
| 36 (80.0) | 9 (20.0) | 29 (64.4) | 18 (40.0) | 19 (42.2) | 11 (24.4) | 12 (26.7) | 28b (62.2) | 5 (11.1) | |||
| Non-infected | 27 (60.0) | 21 (77.8) | 6 (22.2) | 21 (77.8) | 11 (40.7) | 17 (62.9) | 6 (22.2) | 7 (25.9) | 14 (51.8) | 3 (11.1) | |
| Infected | 18 (40.0) | 15 (83.3) | 3 (16.7) | 8 (44.4) | 7 (38.9) | 2 (11.1) | 5 (27.8) | 5 (27.8) | 14 (77.8) | 2 (11.1) | |
| Protozoa | 6 (13.3) | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | 2 (33.3) | 2 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (50.0) | 1 (16.7) | 6 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Giardia duodenalis | 4a (8.9) | 4 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Giardia duodenalis + | 1 (2.2) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Entamoeba histolytica Blastocystis sp. | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Enterovirus | 7 (15.6) | 6 (85.7) | 1 (14.3) | 4 (57.1) | 2 (28.6) | 1 (14.3) | 1 (14.3) | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | 2 (28.6) | |
| Rotavirus | 5a (11.1) | 5 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (60.0) | 1 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | |
| Adenovirus | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Rotavirus + Adenovirus | 1 (2.2) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | |
| Enterobacteria | 5 (11.1) | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 3 (60.0) | 1 (20.0) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 3 (60.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Escherichia coli | 4 (8.9) | 4 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) | 2 (50.0) | 1 (25.0) | 1 (25.0) | 2 (50.0) | 3 (75.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Salmonella spp. | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
* Determined by steatocrit; cut-off limit = 3.0% of fecal fat (Cueto Rua, et al., 2006).
Statistically significant differences between groups: ap<0.05 and bp<0.001, x2 test
Among the markers of intestinal injury, lipids loss in feces occurred more frequently in children with diarrhea (28/45; 62.2%) compared to hemoglobin loss (12/45; 26.7%) or carbohydrates (5/45; 11.1%; p<0.001) (table 2). Steatorrhea was proportionally more frequent in infected individuals (14/18; 77.8%) than in non-infected individuals (14/27; 51.8%), although without statistical significance (p>0.05). There were no differences in the frequency of fecal occult blood of children infected or not by intestinal pathogens. Five children tested positive for carbohydrates in feces. Of these, two were infected by enterovirus (table 2).
Comparison between ratios of fecal fat loss measured by traditional and acid steatocrit in children with diarrhea
Some authors have reported greater efficacy of fecal fat extraction in acidic media 16 for the semi-quantitative determination of fat loss in feces (acid steatocrit). Thus, we compared the traditional steatocrit with the acid steatocrit in 48 samples from children with diarrhea using other samples than those used to assess infectious etiology since previous material was insufficient to perform various tests or, in some cases, inadequately preserved for routine stool culture.
As controls, we used 28 fecal samples from healthy children to evaluate the fecal fat rate. The children with diarrhea had a mean of 5.59% for traditional steatocrit and 6.02% for acid steatocrit (median of 3.76% and 4.94%, respectively). Fecal samples from the asymptomatic children, used as controls, presented a mean of 2.15% for traditional steatocrit and 2.52% for the acid one (figure 1).
The observed steatocrit rates were statistically different between the diarrheic and asymptomatic groups, both by traditional (p<0.0003) and acidic method (p<0.0001) (figure 1). Percentages of fecal fat detected by the acid steatocrit method were 16.7% higher than those obtained by the traditional. Nonetheless, within the same group of children (diarrheic or asymptomatic), we did not observe statistical significance between the fat values obtained by traditional or acid steatocrit.
Figure 1 Comparison between traditional and acid steatocrit rates of fecal samples from children with diarrhea (n=48) and asymptomatic (n=28)
Similar to steatocrit rates, the frequency of children with steatorrhea in the diarrheal disease group compared to asymptomatic children was also significant, regardless of the steatocrit method used, if traditional (p<0.00001) or acid (p<0.0001) (table 3). Considering a normal reference value up to 3%, 32/48 (66.7%) diarrheic children were positive by the traditional and 35/48 (72.9%) by the acid steatocrit method, while 3/28 (10.7%) and 7/28 (25%) asymptomatic children were positive by the traditional and acid methods, respectively (table 3). Although we noticed a slight increase in the frequency of children with steatorrhea using the acid method, this was neither statistically significant for the diarrhea (p=0.656) nor the asymptomatic group (p=0.295) (table 3).
Table 3 Positivity for fecal fat loss by traditional and acid steatocrit in children with and without diarrhea
| Steatorrhea | Steatocrit results | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | ||||||
| Traditional | *p | Acid** | *p | |||
| Asymptomatic | Diarrhea | 0.00001 | Asymptomatic | Diarrhea | 0.0001 | |
| Negative | 25 (89.3) | 16 (33.3) | 21 (75.0) | 13 (27.1) | ||
| Positive | 3 (10.7) | 32 (66.7) | 7 (25.0) | 35 (72.9) | ||
| Total | 28 (100.0) | 48 (100.0) | 28 (100.0) | 48 (100.0) | ||
Positivity for fecal fat loss by steatocrit (reference value ≥ 3%)
* p-value comparing steatorrhea positivity between children with and without diarrhea
** No significant statistical difference was observed in the frequency of steatorrhea in children when detected by the acid steatocrit compared to the traditional method (p=0.295 for the asymptomatic group and p=0.656 for the diarrhea group).
Discussion
In the management of children with diarrhea, it is essential to establish the enteric segment affected, the mechanisms involved (physiopathology), the chronology of the diarrheal process (acute, persistent, or chronic diarrhea), and the potential enteritis infectious etiology 20. According to Andrade and Fagundes-Neto 21, the rates of progression from an acute episode to persistent diarrhea range from 3% to 28% in children under five years of age. This rate depends on numerous reasons, such as enteropathogenic agents isolated in feces, seasonality, geographic aspects, socioeconomic and educational conditions, and levels of environmental sanitation 21. In this study, we found nine cases of persistent diarrhea. Persistent or chronic diarrheal disease has a high impact on morbidity and mortality rates in pediatric populations in developing countries. More than 50% of diarrheal deaths in these places are associated with persistent diarrheal syndrome 2,5.
In developing countries, low socioeconomic conditions are usually linked to gastrointestinal infections caused by parasites, viruses, and bacteria, especially during childhood 22,23. In this study, the analysis of the socioeconomic aspects of the children with diarrhea showed that they were from families with low educational and income levels, both variables usually associated with intestinal pathogen infections in children 23-25.
Rotavirus is considered the most important etiological agent of severe diarrhea in childhood worldwide 26. In this work, 7/45 (15.6%) diarrheic children were diagnosed with enteroviruses, predominating rotavirus infections. Of the five children testing positive for fecal blood, two had rotavirus. Other studies conducted with pediatric patients with diarrhea in the northeastern region of Brazil showed high frequencies (up to 19%) of rotavirus, with the presence of fever, vomiting, and dehydration 27,28. This virus has a higher occurrence in children between four and nine months of age, making it one of the most frequent causes of acute abdominal pain in this age group. One study measuring the occurrence of adenovirus in fecal samples from children with acute gastroenteritis in Belém demonstrated 3.7% (13/380) positivity for adenoviruses 29, a similar frequency found in our study. It is important to note that we did not perform norovirus diagnosis nor use molecular biology tools to detect rotavirus, which could increase the positivity rate of enterovirus infections in the population studied. Norovirus is considered the second cause of gastroenteritis after rotavirus infection, and epidemiological studies show that norovirus infection is frequently associated with outpatient consultations due to gastrointestinal symptoms 30.
Infections by helminths and intestinal protozoa cause a wide range of symptoms associated with the gastrointestinal tract, depending on host demographic, socioeconomic, and immunological factors of the hosts 31,32. In this work, six children with diarrhea had infections by intestinal protozoa. Four of these children had single infections by G. duodenalis, two reported episodes of vomiting and fever (symptoms that can be associated with giardiasis), and one child had a concomitant infection by G. duodenalis and E. histolytica. Belloto et al. ( 33 found G. duodenalis in 47 (15.16%) and E. histolytica in two (0.64%) of the 310 schoolchildren studied in São Paulo. Some reports have associated G. duodenalis infections with childhood diarrhea 21,34,35. However, studies developed by our group found G. duodenalis mostly in asymptomatic children, which seems more common in endemic countries such as Brazil 36,37, and only one child with persistent diarrhea had a single infection by Blastocysts sp. Most Blastocysts sp. infected patients around the world are asymptomatic, but when symptoms persist without other causes, anti-parasite treatment is recommended 38.
Epidemiological studies on species-specific Entamoeba infections are limited due to the morphological resemblance of Entamoeba histolytica with non-pathogenic E. dispar and E. moshkovskii. Specific methods based on molecular techniques like PCR and fecal detection of E. histolytica antigens are required to make a reliable diagnosis of E. histolytica intestinal infections. A study in Pernambuco analyzed 213 stool samples, with 10 (4.7%) positive for E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii complex, but when tested by ELISA for E. histolytica antigens, all samples were negative 39.
Previous studies by our group in Salvador found 788/52,704 (3.4%) and 273/55,218 (0.49%) positive fecal samples for E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii complex by microscopic examination. The group randomly analyzed some amoeba-positive stools by PCR and ELISA. All of them were negative for E. histolytica and positive for E. dispar40. Moreover, the evaluation of specific antibodies in sera by ELISA detected a seropositivity of 8.9% (8/90). These results point out the absence or very low prevalence of E, histolytica in asymptomatic carriers in the evaluated population of Salvador, and the antibody production induced by E. dispar infections 40,41. Nonetheless, our study finding of E. histolytica in one child with diarrhea demonstrates the need for specific laboratory diagnosis of this parasite, even in areas with low transmission.
A study in Brazil with children groups reported an approximate frequency of 10% of diarrheic bacterial infections 42. This result is similar to that found herein (11.1%). Moura et al.43 evaluated 140 stools of diarrheic children in Pernambuco with socioeconomic conditions comparable to those of the population in our study in Salvador. They found 9 (6.4%) samples positive for enteropathogenic and invasive Escherichia coli and 3 (2.1%) for Salmonella spp. In this study, two of the four patients who tested positive for E. coli had blood in their stools. Furthermore, the child with Salmonella spp. had persistent diarrhea, fever, and episodes of vomiting, common symptoms of salmonellosis. Anal fissures are often related to fecal blood, followed by infectious diseases 44. However, none of the participating children presented anal fissures, as observed in medical records.
Among the 45 children with diarrheal disease, five excreted reducing substances in their feces: one had rotavirus infection, one adenovirus infection, and the remaining three were negative for enteric pathogens. Viral replication in the intestinal villi epithelium of the jejunum can induce a process of malabsorption, mainly due to a transient decrease of disaccharidases 14,45. Reducing substances present in stool indicates carbohydrate intolerance, usually secondary to a viral illness. On the other hand, the sugar loss in the feces of non-infected patients may be related to the timedecrease of the fecal bolus in the intestine due to the diarrheal process, generating a reduced absorption of several nutrients, including carbohydrates.
Fecal fat examination generally aims to establish a more objective diagnostic pattern of malabsorption origin (infectious, celiac, or other autoimmune diseases or cystic fibrosis) and in the therapeutic approach. Fecal fat loss estimation usually requires quantitative or semi-quantitative tests. The gold standard test for fecal fat quantitative determination is the van de Kamer test. However, despite its low cost, collecting all stools over 72 hours is inconvenient and difficult to perform with constipated patients, neonates, and infants. In addition, this method requires the infrastructure and reagents for fat extraction and quantification by chemical processes that are not always available in routine laboratories 15,46,47.
Despite the use of the traditional steatocrit method in the evaluation of fecal fat, this test also presents some limitations, such as: the reading of the fat layer when the patient is eliminating insignificant or even undetectable fat amounts, or the observer's inexperience in delimiting the layers for a proper reading of the fat rates. However, performing the technique in triplicate, correctly homogenizing the sample, centrifuging the material in a defined time 15, and even using an acidic media for a more effective fecal fat extraction, as reported 16, can reduce execution error.
In this study, we observed a significant difference in the rates of fat loss in children with diarrhea compared to the asymptomatic children. This effect was evident when using acid steatocrit (p<0.0001). Other authors reported fat malabsorption occurrence in children with diarrhea, as observed in this study 20,21,45. Due to the higher sensitivity of the acid steatocrit in contrast to the classic steatocrit, this method can be useful to rule out steatorrhea as a screening laboratory tool, avoiding subjecting patients to more laborious and timeconsuming techniques such as the van de Kamer test 16,47. It is worth mentioning the increased number of steatorrhea positive cases in asymptomatic children found in our study when using the acid method. A follow-up with consecutive determinations or a quantitative evaluation of fecal fat would be advisable to discard false positive cases of steatorrhea.
Infectious agents and dietary errors are the principal causes of diarrhea in children, and infections by enteropathogens are the most relevant etiology in developing countries 27,48. In this context, methods used to identify infectious agents and to study intestinal malabsorption markers in health services can help to diagnose intestinal diseases, to promote prompt treatment, and to improve prognosis in childhood. The multifactorial etiology of gastroenteritis emphasizes the need for different laboratory methods to identify or exclude infectious agents, to determine markers of intestinal malabsorption, and to evaluate the severity of diarrheal disease.
A determinant limitation of this study was the sample size to evaluate the different pathogens and intestinal integrity markers in children with diarrhea. Among the difficulties encountered, the most important was the reduced amount of feces collected from hospitalized children and their inadequate preservation until laboratory analysis, hampering the use of many samples during the study. Despite the small sample size, the obtained results were similar to those of other studies conducted in Brazil 27-29,34,35,40-42. Moreover, in another study carried out by our group, from January 2011 to June 2012, we analyzed parasitic infections in 151 children with diarrhea from Salvador and we found a relatively low frequency of Cryptosporidium (4.6%) and E. histolytica (3.3%), and the absence of Cyclospora cayetanensis and Cystoisospora belli18. Therefore, a larger sample size would be necessary to find any of these latter parasites in such a specific population.
In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of monitoring childhood diarrhea by different laboratory methods, including acid steatocrit measurement as an alternative tool for the semiquantitative evaluation of fecal fat.
