SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue63INTRINSIC NOISE REDUCTION OF A GAMMA-RAY BACKSCATTERING IMAGING DEVICEHAND PROSTHESIS CONTROLLED BY EEG SIGNALS author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Momento

Print version ISSN 0121-4470

Momento  no.63 Bogotá July/Dec. 2021  Epub Aug 27, 2021

https://doi.org/10.15446/mo.n63.95617 

Articles

DOSIMETRY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS USED IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED PULMONARY EMBOLISM

DOSIMETRIA DE RADIOFARMACOS UTILIZADOS EN PACIENTES ADULTOS CON SOSPECHA DE EMBOLIA PULMONAR

Marcial Vasquez-Arteaga1  * 

Héctor Vega-Carrillo2 

Carlos Rodriguez-Benites3  4 

Carlos Castillo5 

Huber Rodriguez1 

Roger Chanduvi1 

Carlos Chirinos1 

1 Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo, Perú.

2 Unidad Académica de Estudios Nucleares, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, México.

3 Departamento Académico de Física, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo, Perú.

4 Escuela Central de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Lima, Perú.

5 Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo, Perú.


Abstract

The absorbed dose of radiopharmaceuticals is estimated in adults with suspected pulmonary embolism explored by ventilation/perfusion studies. For pulmonary ventilation studies 81mKr, 133Xe, 99mTc (Technegas)-aerosol and 99mTc (DTPA)-aerosol are used. For perfusion agents, 99m Tc(MAA), 99mTc (MSA) (macroaggregates and albumin microspheres) are used. For the dose calculation, the MIRD methodology and the anthropomorphic representation of the biokinetic organs of Cristy-Eckerman are used. In ventilation/perfusion studies, the lowest dose absorbed by the lungs with suspected embolism is due to 81mKr/99mTc (MSA), and the highest dose is due to 99mTc (Technegas)/99mTc (MAA) calculated for activities of 150 MBq for perfusion agents and 40 MBq for ventilation agents.

Keywords: Internal dosimetry; radiopharmaceuticals; ventilation; pulmonary embolism

Resumen

Se estima la dosis absorbida de radiofármacos en adultos con sospecha de embolia pulmonar explorada por estudios de ventilación/perfusión. Para estudios de ventilación pulmonar se utilizan 81mKr, 133Xe, 99mTc (Technegas) -aerosol y 99mTc (DTPA) -aerosol. Para agentes de perfusión se utilizan 99mTc (MAA) y 99mTc(MSA) (macroagregados y microesferas de albumina). Para el cálculo de dosis se utiliza la metodología MIRD y la representación antropomórfica de los órganos biocinéticos de Cristy-Eckerman. En estudios de ventilación/perfusión la menor dosis absorbida por los pulmones con sospecha de embolia se debe a 81mKr/99mTc (MSA), y la dosis más alta se debe a 99mTc(Technegas)/99mTc(MAA), calculada para actividades de 150 MBq para agentes de perfusión y 40 MBq para agentes de ventilación.

Palabras clave: Dosimetría interna; radiofármacos; ventilación; embolia pulmonar

Introduction

Nuclear medicine is a mature medical specialty where radioisotopes are used to diagnose and to treat diseases, as well as to carry out scientific research. In order to obtain images a small amount of a pharmaceutical compound with a radioisotope (radiopharmaceutical or radiotracer) is administrated by inhalation, ingestion or injection [1,2].

The radiopharmaceuticals that interact directly with human metabolism are distributed among the organs and tissues of the body according to their biokinetics (biokinetic organs). Radiations emitted by the radiopharmaceuticals interact with organs and tissues of the body, and the absorbed dose depends upon the amount of the administrated radioactive material, the radionuclide decay scheme and its bio kinetics. In order to calculate the absorbed dose in the organs and tissues are used the biokinetic models and the radiopharmaceutical data that are available in the literature [3-8].

So far the internal dose cannot be measured directly, and none operational quantity has been defined to stand in their place. Calculation of the absorbed dose requires mathematical evaluation using mathematical equations and models that simulate human metabolism [9].

There are several methods used for the internal dosimetric calculation; however, the MIRD (Medical Internal Radiation Dose) procedure is mostly used. With MIRD the absorbed dose in an organ is calculated due to radiation received from one or more source organs in the organism [10,11].

To estimate the absorbed dose in adult pulmonary studies 81mKr, 133Xe, 99mTc-Technegas (carbon suspension)-aerosol, and 99mTc- (DTPA)-aerosol radiopharmaceuticals are used to evaluate the pulmonary ventilation (air distribution in the respiratory ducts). To evaluate the distribution of blood flow in the lungs (perfusion) are used macro aggregates (MAA) or 99mTc labeled albumin microspheres (MSA). For diagnosis purpose in adults with suspected pulmonary embolism, the study should combine pulmonary ventilation/perfusion [12,13].

The objective of this work is to determine the procedure that delivers the minimum radiation dose to adult patients with suspected of pulmonary embolism whose study is carried out with radiopharmaceuticals used for Ventilation/Perfusion diagnosis study. The doses were calculated using the MIRD methodology and anthropomorphic representation of Cristy and Eckerman [14].

Materials y Methods

The 99mTc is disintegrated by isomeric transition by gamma emission, β, with an energy of 140 keV and a half-life of 6 hours. The 81mKr decays by isomeric transition emitting 7 with an energy of 190 keV and a half-life of 13 s, gamma radiation can transfer energy directly to one of the most tightly bound electrons, expelling it from the atom, a process named internal conversion. The Xe133 is essentially a β-emitter that decays emitting 7 radiation of 81 keV fundamentally, and a half-life of 5.2 d. [15].

Photons and particles emitted by radioisotopes have a different interaction mechanism with matter; they also have different ranges in the tissues. Therefore, the MIRD procedure was applied using the lungs (target organ) where the absorbed dose per unit of activity was calculated using equation 1.

On the right side of the equation, the absorbed dose represents the dose to the lungs due to the source organ i and its self-dose. In the equation, ∆ j is the average energy of photon j emitted by 99mTc, 133Xe o 81mKr by decay, Φj (lungs ← i) is the fraction of energy of the photon j, emitted by the organ i that is absorbed by the lung per unit mass of the lung; it is also known as the Specific Absorbed Fraction (SAF) [14], and T i is the residence time of the radiopharmaceutical in the source organ i. The absorbed dose, in the lungs due to conversion electrons and Auger electrons was calculated using equation 2.

Here, Ē particle is the average energy of the particle, T lungs residence time of the radiopharmaceuticals in the lungs; while m lungs is the mass of the lungs of an adult.

The most significant residence times for 81mKr, 133Xe, 99mTc (technegas), the 99mTc (MAA) in the biokinetic organs used in dose calculations are shown in Table 1[6,16]. This table includes times of residence for 99mTc (DTPA)-aerosol and 99mTc (MSA) [17].

TABLE 1 Residence time in hours used as organs of biokinetic [6,16,17] 

99mTc (MAA) TB (excl. bladder) 7.610 Lung 4.890 Liver 1.040 Kidney 0.018 Blader content 0.217
99mTc (Technegas) Lungs 8.0 ULI(cont) 0.024 Stomach cont 0.019 Remain tissue 0.069 SI content 0.016
133Xe (5 minutes) Lungs 0.013 Remain tissue 0.533
Kr81m (gas) Lungs 0.00528
99mTc (DTPA) aerosol Lung Wahout 1.58 Bladder content (2.4hs-void) 0.606 Remainder of body 0.502 Kidney 0.0394
99mTc (MSA) Lung 4.28 Stomatch 0.429 Kidney 0.672 Bladder 0.202

TB: Whole Body: SI: Small intestine; ULI: Upper large intestine.

The dosimetric behavior of radiopharmaceuticals is related to the residence times of the organs of their biokinetic, which in turn, related to differences in biological and physical excretion mechanisms.

In the Tables 2 and 3 are shown the characteristics of photons, and particles emitted in the decay of 99mTc, 133Xe and 81mKr [16] that were used in the dose calculation.

TABLE 2 Nuclear data of emitted photons (MeV) of 99m Tc, 133 Xe and 81m Kr more significant [16] . 

Photons Ek (MeV) n k part/dis k=2.13 n k E k (rad - g) μCi - h
99mTc Gamma Radiation 0.1405 0.8906 0.2665
0.1426 0.0002 0.0001
Characteristic radiation 0.0183 0.021 0.0008
0.0184 0.040 0.0016
0.0206 0.012 0.0005
133Xe Gamma Radiation 0.1606 0.0007 0.0002
0.0796 0.0027 0.0004
0.0810 0.3800 0.0656
Characteristic radiation 0.0306 0.1410 0.0092
0.0310 0.2620 0.0173
0.0350 0.0940 0.0070
81mKr Gamma Radiation 0.1905 0.6761 0.274
Characteristic radiation 0.0127 0.098 0.0027
0.0126 0.0507 0.00136
0.0141 0.0150 0.00044

TABLE 3 Nuclear data emitted particles (MeV) of 99m Tc , 133 Xe and 81m Kr [16] . 

Particles Ek (MeV) n k part/dis n k E k Mev/dis E particle = Σn k E k Mev/dis
99mTc Conversion electrons 0.1195 0.0880 0.01052 0.01446
0.1216 0.0055 0.00067
0.1375 0.0107 0.0015
0.1396 0.0017 0.00024
0.1400 0.0019 0.00026
0.1404 0.0004 0.00006
0.1421 0.0003 0.00004
0.0016 0.7460 0.00120
Auger electrons 0.0022 0.102 0.00022 0.00054
0.0155 0.0207 0.00032
133Xe Beta 0.0750 0.0081 0.00061 0.1001
0.1005 0.9900 0.09949
Conversion electrons 0.0436 0.0041 0.00018 0.03284
0.0450 0.5510 0.02479
0.0753 0.0820 0.00617
0.0798 0.0169 0.00135
0.0808 0.0044 0.00035
Auger electrons 0.0035 0.5100 0.00178 0.00326
0.0255 0.0582 0.00148
81mKr Conversion electrons 0.1761 0.2690 0.0473 0.051
0.1885 0.0251 0.00475
Auger electrons 0.0106 0.0110 0.166 x10-4 4.54 x10-4
0.0107 0.0064 0.68 x10-4
0.0108 0.0342 3.7 x10-4

The mass of the organs included in adult biokinetics used in the calculations indicates that the mass of the lungs is 1000 g and the mass of the whole body (TB) is 73700 g. [6,14].

For diagnostic purposes in adults with suspected pulmonary embolism, the study should combine pulmonary ventilation/perfusion (V/P) agents [12,13].

In the ventilation/perfusion studies normally are used 150 MBq for perfusion agents and 40 MBq for ventilation agents [18-22].

The absorbed dose due to ventilation/perfusion studies (V/P) was calculated using equation 3:

PD and VD are the doses absorbed by the lungs due to the P (perfusion) and V (ventilation) agents given in mGy/MBq.

Dose results due to V/P agents are given in mGy.

Results

Using the MIRD methodology and the biokinetic characteristics of the pulmonary ventilatory agents 81mKr, 133Xe, 99mTc (tecnegas), 99mTc (DTPA) - aerosol, and perfusion agents 99mTc (MAA) and 99mTc (MSA), the absorbed doses per unit of activity administered to the lungs are determined for each of these agents. Their autodose and the organ dosimetric contributions of their biokinetics are determined.

Table 4 shows the absorbed dose in the lungs, due to photons and radiopharmaceutical particles during perfusion and ventilation studies. Show the absorbed dose, due to photons and particles, in the adult lung during perfusion and ventilation study.

TABLE 4 Absorbed dose per unit of activity administered in the lungs of the adult patient due to perfusion agents 99m Tc(MAA) and 99m Tc (MSA), and ventilation agents 133 Xe, 81m Kr, 99m Tc (Technegas), and 99m Tc (DTPA)-aerosol. 

RFM emissions D(lung ← lung)/Ao D(lung ← i)/Ao Total mGy/MBq
99mTc (MAA) Radiation: γ + X 0.0203(30.2%) 0.00048 (7.0 %) 0.067
e-CI + e- Auger 0.04217(62.9%) -
Self-dose 0.06250 (93.0%)
99mTc (MSA) Radiation: γ + X 0.0178 (32.4%) 0.000346 (0.6 %) 0.055
e- CI + e- Auger 0.0369 (67 %)
Self-dose 0.0547 (99.4 %)
99mTc Technegas Radiation: γ + X 0.0338 (32.8%) 0.00007 (0.1 %) 0.103
e-CI + e- Auger 0.0690 (67.0%) -
Self-dose 0.1028 (99.8%)
99mTc (DTPA) Radiation: γ + X 0.0065 (32.2%) 0.00019 (1 %) 0.0202
e-CI + e- Auger 0.0135 (66.8 %)
Self-dose 0.020 (99.0%) -
133Xe Radiation: γ + X 0.00001 (0.5%) 0.00012 (11 %) 0.0011
β+e-CI + e- Auger 0.00097 (88.3%)
Self-dose 0.00098 (89%)
8imKr Radiation: γ + X 0.00003 (15%) 0.00020
e- CI + e- Auger 0.00017 (85%)
Self-dose 0.00020 (100%)

Table 5 shows the absorbed dose per unit of activity administered in lungs of the adult patient with suspected pulmonary embolism undergoing a perfusion/ventilation study.

TABLE 5 Radiation dose in the lungs during Ventilation/Perfusion patients with suspicion of pulmonary embolism for activities of 150MBq (perfusion), and 40 MBq (ventilation). 

Equation: *V/P = 150 MBq xPd [mGy/MBq ]+ 40 MBq xVd [ mGy/MBq]
Agents P 99mTc(MAA) 99mTc (MSA)
Agents V 99mTc (DTPA) 99mTc (Technegas) 133Xe 81mKr 99mTc (DTPA) 99mTc (Technegas) 133Xe 81mKr
Absorbed dose (mGy) 10.85 14.17 10.09 10.06 9.05 12.37 8.29 8.26

*99mTc (DTPA) / 99mTc (MAA) =150MBq x 0.067 mGy/MBq + 40MBq x 0.020 mGy/MBq = 10.85mGy

Discussion

Table 4 shows that in perfusion studies the lowest dose received by the lungs is due to 99mTc (MSA). In ventilation studies the lower dose is when 81mKr is used.

Table 5 shows that the lowest absorbed dose by the lungs with suspected pulmonary embolism is due to 81mKr / 99mTc (MSA), while the highest absorbed dose is due to 99mTc (Technegas) / 99mTc (MAA).

The dose received by the lungs due to 99mTc (MAA) is 0.067 mGy/MBq, the 93 % of it corresponds to its self-dose (63 % to electrons and 30 % to photons); the rest is due to organs involved in the biokinetic: the liver, kidneys, bladder, and the rest of the tissue the most exposed organ is the liver with 0.0007mGy/MBq. The absorbed dose by the lungs due to 99mTc(MSA) is 0.055 mGy/MBq; the 99.4% corresponds to its self-dose, the rest of the organs involved in biokinetics correspond to the stomach wall as the most exposed organ 0.0002 mGy/MBq.

The absorbed dose by the lungs due to 99mTc (Technegas) is 0.103 mGy/MBq, the 99.8% corresponds to its self-dose (67% to electrons and 32.8 % to photons), the most exposed biokinetic organ is stomach wall with 0.00001 mGy/MBq. Likewise, the absorbed dose in the lungs due to 99mTc(DTPA) is 0.0202 mGy/MBq , the 99.0% corresponds to its self-dose (67% to electrons and 32% to photons), and the most exposed biokinetic organ is the bladder with 0.00002 mGy/MBq . Finally, the absorbed dose in the lungs due to 81mKr is 0.0002 mGy/MBq, it represents the 100 % of its self-dose (85% to electrons and 15% to photons); and for 133Xe (rebreathing for 5 min) the absorbed dose is 0.0011 mGy/MBq, the 89% corresponds to its self-dose (66.4% corresponds to beta, 20% to electronic conversion and 2.2% to Auger electrons).

In all cases the radiations emitted by the radioisotopes Kr81 m, Xe133 and Tc99m (characteristic radiation, gamma, conversion electrons and Auger electrons) conversion electrons are found, in addition to the 133Xe beta which most contribute to the self-dose of the lungs in adults.

The dosimetric contributions of the organs that are part of the biokinetic are greater when using 133Xe with 11%, followed by 99mTc (MAA) with 7 %.

Among the modalities to detect pulmonary embolism, both the V/Q scan and the CTPA (computed tomography pulmonary angiography) expose the patient to ionizing radiation as shown in table 5, in general, carries larger radiation doses than the scan V/Q [23].

Conclusions

Using the MIRD methodology and the Cristy-Eckerman representation for adult lungs, the dose to the lungs was calculated. The dose calculation includes the self-dose in the lungs and the dose due to the source organs involved in the biokinetic of 133Xe, 81mKr, 99mTc (DTPA, MAA, MSA and Technegas).

The highest absorbed dose by the lungs comes from its self-dose due to the charged particles produced during the decay of the 99mTc 81mKr y 133Xe

The lowest absorbed dose by the lungs with suspected pulmonary embolism is due to 81 mKr/99mTc (MSA), and the highest dose is due to 99mTc(Technegas)/99mTc (MAA) calculated for usually recommended activities of 150 MBq for agents' perfusion and 40 MBq for ventilation.

References

[1] M. Nazififard, S. Mahdizadeh, A. S. Meigooni, M. Alavi, and K. Y. Suh, Radiation Protection Dosimetry 151, 469 (2012). [ Links ]

[2] A. Sureshkumar, B. Hansen, and D. Ersahin, Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 41, 10 (2020). [ Links ]

[3] ICRP, Annals of ICRP Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals, Vol. 28 (The International Commission on Radiological Protection - PERGAMON, 1998) pp. 1-126. [ Links ]

[4] M. Andersson, L. Johansson, D. Minarik, S. Leide-Svegborn, and S. Mattsson, EJNMMI Physics 1, 9 (2014). [ Links ]

[5] M. Andersson, EJNMMI Physics 2, 22 (2015). [ Links ]

[6] S. Mattsson , L. Johansson , S. L. Svegborn, J. Liniecki, D. Nofike, K. Riklund, M. Stabin, D. Taylor, W. Bolch, S. Carlsson, K. Eckerman, A. Giussani, L. Sõderberg, and S. Valind, Annals of the ICRP 44, 7 (2015). [ Links ]

[7] M. Vasquez Arteaga, V. Murillo Caballero, and K. Marín Rengifo, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 138, 25 (2018). [ Links ]

[8] M. Vásquez-Arteaga, H. Vega-Carrillo, C. Rodriguez-Benites, K. Marín-Rengifo, A. Jimenez-García, and A. Ruiz-Gomez, MOMENTO 62, 32 (2021). [ Links ]

[9] W. Bolch , D. Jokisch, M. Zankl, K. Eckerman , T. Fell, R. Manger, A. Endo, J. Hunt, K. Kim, and N. Petoussi-Henss, Annals of the ICRP 45, 5 (2016). [ Links ]

[10] E. E. Watson, M. G. Stabin, and J. A. Siegel, Medical Physics 20, 511 (1993). [ Links ]

[11] J. Bevelacqua, Radiation Protection Management 22, 7 (2005). [ Links ]

[12] G. Nicolas, A. Chirindel, M. Cachovan, A. H. Vija, M. Tamm, D. Lardinois, and D. Wild, Journal of Nuclear Medicine 59, 516 (2018). [ Links ]

[13] W. Schaefer, D. Knollmann, J. Avondo, and A. Meyer, Journal of Nuclear Medicine 57, 31 (2018). [ Links ]

[14] M. Cristy and K. F. Eckerman, Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA) 7 (1987). [ Links ]

[15] A. Parker, E. Coleman, E. Grady, H. D. Royal, B. A. Siegel, M. G. Stabin, D. Sostman, A. J. W. Hilson, and Society of Nuclear Medicine, J Nucl Med Technol. 40 (2012). [ Links ]

[16] HPS, "Kinetic models used as the basic for the dose estimates. health physics society," (2013), (Visited on March 2019). [ Links ]

[17] Task Group of Committee 2, Annals of the ICRP 18, 1 (1987). [ Links ]

[18] M. Ferrari, P. De Marco, D. Origgi, and G. Pedroli, Clinical and Translational Imaging 2, 557 (2014). [ Links ]

[19] I. Badshah, in 2018 CANM-CAMRT Joint Annual Conference (2018). [ Links ]

[20] J. Anthony Parker, R. Edward Coleman, B. A. Siegel , H. Dirk Sostman, K. A. McKusick, and H. D. Royal , Journal of Nuclear Medicine 37, 1906 (1996). [ Links ]

[21] J. Anthony Parker, R. Edward Coleman, E. Grady , H. D. Royal , B. A. Siegel , M. G. Stabin , H. D. Sostman , and A. J. Hilson, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology 40, 57 (2012). [ Links ]

[22] M. B. nad, J. B. Neilly, M. Miniati, C. Schuemichen, M. Meignan, and B. Jonson, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36, 1356 (2009). [ Links ]

[23] M. Mujoomdar, E. Russell, F. Dionne, K. Moulton, C. Murray, S. McGill, and K. Lambe., Optimizing Health System Use of Medical Isotopes and Other Imaging Modalities (Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2012). [ Links ]

Received: April 2021; Accepted: June 2021

* Marcial Vúsquez-Arteaga: marvva@hotmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License