Introduction
Although ITP was formerly used for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, it is now used for pathologies that develop due to an immunological cause. But the autoantibodies are only diagnosed in 50-60% of patients 1. The clinical process is usually longer in adults 1. Treatment of ITP involves corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-D, and rituximab (anti-CD20) that are used differentially during the acute and persistent/chronic phase of the disease. Splenectomy is predominantly considered for refractory adult patients in the chronic phase 1. Our patient also had a history of splenectomy due to refractory thrombocytopenia.
Delftia acidovorans is an anaerobic, oxidase positive and Gram-negative generally non-pathogenic bacillus that can be cultured in MacConkey agar 2-5. There are few case reports in the literature that have been reported to cause infection in humans 2,3. In accordance with some case reports Delftia acidovorans can cause infective endocarditis, ocular infections, otitis media, peritonitis, urinary tract infections, empyema, and nosocomial bacteremia, including central venous catheter-related bacteremia in immunocompromised individuals 6. According to our investigation, here we present the first example of cavitary and interstitial pneumonia caused by Delftia acidovorans in a patient who received immunosuppressive treatment due to ITP.
Case description
A 52-year-old female patient was admitted to our outpatient clinic with complaints of chest pain, cough, sputum dyspnea, and weight loss, which was started three weeks ago. The patient with diabetes mellitus was under immunosuppressive therapy for five years due to drug-resistant ITP. Our patient also had a history of splenectomy due to refractory thrombocytopenia. In the last year, the patient's treatment was daily 50 mg azathioprine and 4 mg methylprednisolone. On examination, the patient's temperature was 38° C. The respiratory rate was 25 min and the pulse rate was 95 beats/min. In auscultation, the inspiratory crackles were heard on both hemithorax. WBC counts were 17,600 mm3 and platelet counts were 29,000 mm3. Oxygen saturation measured by the pulse oximeter was 97%. Chest X-ray showed diffuse reticular opacities that were more prominent in the upper zones of both lungs (Fig. 1).
The patient was hospitalized with suspicions of opportunistic pulmonary infection and cavitary lung disease. Empirically, intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam (3x4.5 g/day) and oral clarithromycin (2x500 mg/day) were started. Thorax CT revealed many thin-walled cavities and millimetric nodules accompanied by ground-glass infiltrates in the upper and middle lobes of both lungs (Fig. 1). Most of the nodules, which one of the largest has 17x12 mm in diameter, predominantly were located in the peripheral areas (Fig. 1). The disease which could develop cavities in the lung, such as tuberculosis, rheumatic lung diseases, vasculitis syndromes, and fungal infections were excluded by using acid-fast bacilli staining and Gram staining, serum and blood galactomannan levels, and vasculitis markers.
Gram staining of bronchial fluid, taken by bronchoscopy, revealed Gram-negative bacilli and intense polymorphonuclear leukocytes. The bronchial fluid sample obtained by bronchoscopy was inoculated in 5% sheep blood and Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar and then was cultured by semiquantitative culture method in the microbiology laboratory. The cultured sample was incubated for 48 hours at 37° C under aerobic conditions. After the incubation, the colonies, >105 CFU/mL, which have the white central areas with gray edges and irregular borders, were observed in the blood agar. EMB agar revealed colonies that did not ferment lactose and had a clear appearance. In TSI medium, citrate and oxidase positive, mobile and Gram-negative bacilli, which couldn't ferment glucose, lactose, and sucrose, were detected. Delftia acidovorans were defined as by using the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD). Before the patient sample was inoculated into the automated system, there was no growth in the culture taken from the sample of the automated system to eliminate device-related contamination. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was also performed with the same system as previously performed 7-9. The Phoenix ID broth was inoculated with bacterial colonies from a pure culture adjusted to a 0.5 to 0.6 McFarland standard using a nephelometer. After having transferred 25 μL of the ID suspension to the Phoenix AST broth, the suspension was poured into the ID side of the Phoenix panel. Once inoculated the panel was logged and loaded into the instrument, where kinetic measurements of colorimetric and fluorescent signals were collected every 20 min 9. EUCAST 2017 criteria were used to evaluate the thresholds for antibiotic susceptibility, as in the study by Ranc et al10. Results were classified as sensitivity (S), moderate sensitivity (MS), and resistance (R) (Table 1).
Antibiotics | Sensitivity result | (MIC, µg/mL) |
---|---|---|
Amikacin | Resistant | >16 |
Aztreonam | Moderate-sensitive | 16 |
Cefepime | Resistant | >8 |
Ceftazidime | Sensitive | 1 |
Ciprofloxacin | Resistant | >2 |
Colistin | Resistant | >4 |
Gentamicin | Resistant | >4 |
Imipenem | Sensitive | 1 |
Netilmicin | Resistant | >4 |
Piperacillin | Sensitive | ≤4 |
Piperacillin/Tazobactam | Sensitive | ≤4/4 |
MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration
Empirical treatment was continued for 21 days because the sensitivity was detected. After the treatment, the patient's clinical and radiological findings regressed significantly, and he was discharged with outpatient follow-up. At the 12th months of follow-up, thoracic CT taken for transient dyspnea revealed that pulmonary infiltrates were significantly reduced and only sequelae cavitary lesions could be observed (Fig. 1).
According to our investigation, this case is the first example of cavitary, and interstitial pneumonia caused by Delftia acidovorans in a patient with immunosuppression.
Discussion
A pulmonary cavity is defined as a gas-filled space in the lung and occurs by the accumulation of air into a nodule, mass or a region of consolidation 11. A pulmonary cavity is the common finding of a wide variety of the pathological process which is affecting the lung. Since some diseases are more associated with the development of the pulmonary cavity the evaluation of the cavity helps to clinicians in the differential diagnosis 12. According to the developmental periods, it is recommended to divide the cavities into two groups. Some cavities develop within the 12 weeks, while others require more than 12 weeks 13. A rapidly developing cavity (<12 weeks) strongly suggests an infectious or acute cause. However, the cavities those had a more chronic or silent development (>12 weeks) support the presence of chronic infections, autoimmune conditions, or malignancy. Nevertheless, there may be a significant change in the temporal development of cavitary disease processes, depending on both the patient's immune status and comorbidities 13. We suspected that the patient has an infection because the patient's complaints had started three weeks ago and she had been receiving immunosuppressive treatment for a long time. Moreover, the radiological findings also suggested the possibility of cavitary lung disease in addition to the suspicion about infectious diseases.
There are some reports of Delftia acidovorans that cause infection in humans 2-5. However, in the literature, we could not find a study reported that Delftia acidovorans causes pulmonary cavitary disease. The vasculitis syndromes were not considered among the preliminary diagnoses since the markers of cavitary pulmonary vasculitis syndromes were negative.
The cavity development is more common in some disease such as tuberculosis and Klebsiella pneumoniae infections 12. Additionally, some fungal infections may also cause cavity development in the lung 12. However, in our patient's serial sputum microscopy the acid-fast bacilli were not detected. Bronchoscopic fluid analysis has been reported to be useful when a specific infectious agent, such as fungal and tuberculosis infection, is suspected in immunocompromised patients 14,15. Therefore, we also performed bronchoscopy for further analysis. The galactomannan antigen was found negative in serum and bronchoscopic fluid.
In a large-sample study using PCR for validity and comparing Biotyper (MALDI-TOF MS; matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry) and Phoenix methods, the urine-isolated bacteria was accurately identified 99.9% and 99.5% at the genus level, 99.1% and 98.5% at the species level 7. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the Phoenix automated microbiology systems can be used for in the majority of strains encountered in a university-based laboratory to evaluate the identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) performances 8. For this reason, we used this system to evaluate the identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility test. By bronchial lavage fluid culture and automatized bacteria validation test Delftia acidovorans was detected.
Bilgin et al. 2, reported a case of Delfia acidovorence pneumonia in a patient with neutropenia. However, in their case, there was no pulmonary cavitary involvement 2. Taş et al. 5, reported that they detect Delftia acidovorans in deep tracheal aspiration culture of a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This patient with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection died despite treatment 5. The reported cases of Delfia infection consist mostly of patients with immunodeficiency 2,16,17 However, there are also cases reported in immunocompetent patients 3,5,18. Khan et al. 3, reported a case of Delftia acidovorans bacteremia, in a four-year-old immunocompetent patient with pulmonary abscess. Patel et al. 14, reported a case of catheter-related septic pulmonary embolism, caused by Delftia acidovorans in a 49-year-old woman with vertebral osteomyelitis. However, there was no cavitary pulmonary infiltrates in this patient CT images, and the CT scan revealed bilateral pulmonary nodules and pleural effusion. For an accurate diagnosis and treatment, the elimination of the contaminations is very important. Before examining the patient sample, we took a swab sample from the automated system in order to eliminate contamination. There was not a bacterial growth in the culture of this swab sample. Additionally, this organism couldn't be isolated from the culture of other patients. Moreover, the patient's clinical features, laboratory, and radiological findings indicated the presence of a pulmonary infection. These points supported the fact that this organism wasn't an environmental contaminant for our patient.
In Latin America, Galles et al. 19, examined a total of 176 unusual, non-facultative gram-negative bacteria, including four Delftia acidovorans isolates. In this multicenter study, there was poor in vitro efficacy with aminoglycosides. Although the information on Delftia acidovorans sensitivity is limited, Delftia acidovorans is generally known to be susceptible to broad-spectrum cephalosporins, piperacillin, aztreonam, carbapenems, quinolones, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 19. Similarly, in our case, an effective response was obtained with piperacillin/tazobactam treatment (MIC ≤4/4/g/mL). Since Delftia acidovorans isolates are resistant to aminoglycosides, type determination is important for appropriate treatment 20. Similarly, in our case, the bacterium was found to be resistant to aminoglycosides (MIC <16 μg/dL for amikacin).
According to our literature research, the case presented here will be the first example of pulmonary cavitary infiltrates due to Delftia acidovorans.