33CONSIDERAÇÕES SOBRE O MÉTODO, A ORDEM E O ENTENDIMENTO EM RENÉ DESCARTES E BENEDICTUS DE SPINOZA 
Home Page  

  • SciELO

  • Google
  • SciELO
  • Google


Estudios de Filosofía

 ISSN 0121-3628

RENDON ARROYAVE, Carlos Emel. DOMINIO Y SERVIDUMBRE: La crítica de Hegel a Fichte en el escrito sobre la Diferencia. []. , 33, pp.20-51. ISSN 0121-3628.

Summary. This article is a revision of the criticism that Hegel makes to conception of nature that underlies Fichte’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. In Hegel’s Differences Between the Philosophical System of Fichte and Schelling (1801), Hegel directs his reflection to the relation between Dominance and Submission that Fichte‘s Philosophy establishes between Reason and Nature. And this to such a degree, that it turns out to be the base for the deduction of Natural Right, whose main purpose is to show the possibility of Auto-conscience and, with it, that of the Human Community in general. Hegel shows that Fichte‘s deduction is contradictory, and from his critique he will lay down a new concept of Nature.

: Fichte; Nature; Reason; Natural Right; Dominion; Submission.

        · |     · |     · ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License