SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.63 issue155IS ARISTOTLE'S RESPONSE TO THE ARGUMENT FOR FATALISM IN DE INTERPRETATIONE 9 SUCCESSFUL?THE IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL: HISTORY OF A POLITICAL ARGUMENT author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Ideas y Valores

Print version ISSN 0120-0062

Abstract

PARRA AYALA, ANDRÉS FELIPE. HERMENEUTICAL DISSENT A POLITICAL INTERPRETATION OF H. G. GADAMER'S FUSION OF HORIZONS. Ideas y Valores [online]. 2014, vol.63, n.155, pp.59-84. ISSN 0120-0062.  https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v63n155.34217.

The article provides a theoretical-political interpretation of Gadamer's fusion of horizons, arguing that, from a hermeneutical point of view, political dialogue should be understood as the process of questioning and challenging the horizons of meaning underlying social practices. Likewise, the article holds that dialogue establishes a common question-scenario that opens up the social horizon of meaning to contingency and uncertainty, and that it never seeks a procedural or substantial consensus that eliminates conflicts and reconciles different perspectives in a homogeneous point of view.

Keywords : H. G. Gadamer; J. Habermas; consensus; dissent; fusion of horizons.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )