Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Cited by Google
Similars in SciELO
Similars in Google
Share
Revista de Economía Institucional
Print version ISSN 0124-5996
Abstract
KEEN, Steve. The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change. Rev.econ.inst. [online]. 2021, vol.23, n.44, pp.13-52. Epub Apr 28, 2021. ISSN 0124-5996. https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v23n44.02.
Forecasts by economists of the economic damage f rom climate change have been notably sanguine, compared to warnings by scientists about damage to the biosphere. This is because economists made their own predictions of damages, using three spurious methods: assuming that about 90% of GDP will be unaffected by climate change, because it happens indoors; using the relationship between temperature and GDP today as a proxy for the impact of global warming over time; and using surveys that diluted extreme warnings from scientists with optimistic expectations f rom economists. Nordhaus has misrepresented the scientific literature to justify the using a smooth function to describe the damage to GDP f rom climate change. Correcting for these errors makes it feasible that the economic damages from climate change are at least an order of magnitude worse than forecast by economists, and may be so great as to threaten the survival of human civilization.
Keywords : PIB; global warming; change; JEL: D31, E44, Q51.