SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue44Why weren't we ready for the coronavirus? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de Economía Institucional

Print version ISSN 0124-5996

Abstract

KEEN, Steve. The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change. Rev.econ.inst. [online]. 2021, vol.23, n.44, pp.13-52.  Epub Apr 28, 2021. ISSN 0124-5996.  https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v23n44.02.

Forecasts by economists of the economic damage f rom climate change have been notably sanguine, compared to warnings by scientists about damage to the biosphere. This is because economists made their own predictions of damages, using three spurious methods: assuming that about 90% of GDP will be unaffected by climate change, because it happens indoors; using the relationship between temperature and GDP today as a proxy for the impact of global warming over time; and using surveys that diluted extreme warnings from scientists with optimistic expectations f rom economists. Nordhaus has misrepresented the scientific literature to justify the using a smooth function to describe the damage to GDP f rom climate change. Correcting for these errors makes it feasible that the economic damages from climate change are at least an order of magnitude worse than forecast by economists, and may be so great as to threaten the survival of human civilization.

Keywords : PIB; global warming; change; JEL: D31, E44, Q51.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )