Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Share
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología
Print version ISSN 0120-0534
Abstract
RIANO-HERNANDEZ, Diana et al. Reliability of the computerised version of the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFF-20). rev.latinoam.psicol. [online]. 2016, vol.48, n.3, pp.167-174. ISSN 0120-0534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j-rlp.2016.06.001.
The impulsivity-reflexivity construct refers to a cognitive style. Two dimensions have been proposed for their evaluation: Impulsivity, when responses are generated with a number of errors and short latency period, and reflexivity, when responses are generated with a few mistakes and long latency time. This study aims to compare the reliability coefficients obtained by applying computerised version (MFF-O) of the Matching Figures Test-20 (MFF-20) against a paper-based version (MFF-P). Three independent samples were obtained with participants aged from 6 to 11 years. The first sample consisted of 50 children who were evaluated with the MFF-P version, and 6 months later they were evaluated with the MFF-O version. The second sample included 52 children who were evaluated with the MFF-P version, and then re-evaluated with the same version 6 months later. Subsequently, a third sample including 298 children was evaluated with the MFF-O. The results showed a comparison between the psychometric properties and conditions of the computer-based version. It was concluded conclude that the computer-based MFF-20 version has adequate reliability and psychometric properties that are similar to the paper-based MFF-P version.
Keywords : Evaluation; Impulsivity-reflexivity; Children; Matching Figures Test-20 (MFF-20).