SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 issue2MEANS OF INTERPRETATION, LEGAL HERMENEUTICS AND NATURAL LAWDETERMINATIO IN THE PROCESS OF ADJUDICATION: A PRUDENTIAL VIEW OF LEGAL REASONING author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Díkaion

Print version ISSN 0120-8942

Abstract

HERRERA, DANIEL ALEJANDRO. FALLACIES AND TRUTHS IN THE CURRENT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS JUSTIFICATION. Díkaion [online]. 2010, vol.19, n.2, pp.349-372. ISSN 0120-8942.

In this article it pretends to show the fallacies and truths of the different actual justifications of the Essentials Rights. Precisely, being the problem of the rational justification, will focus the question on the problem of the reason and the extent of their knowledge. To better manage the exposure of the different foundations, they will be classified in three lines: 1) positivistic reason; 2) proceduralist reason; 3) practical reason.

Keywords : Human rights; essentials rights; fallacy; true; positivistic reason; proceduralist reason; practical reason; metaphysics; anthropology.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )