Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Cited by Google
Similars in SciELO
Similars in Google
Share
Díkaion
Print version ISSN 0120-8942
Abstract
HERRERA, DANIEL ALEJANDRO. FALLACIES AND TRUTHS IN THE CURRENT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS JUSTIFICATION. Díkaion [online]. 2010, vol.19, n.2, pp.349-372. ISSN 0120-8942.
In this article it pretends to show the fallacies and truths of the different actual justifications of the Essentials Rights. Precisely, being the problem of the rational justification, will focus the question on the problem of the reason and the extent of their knowledge. To better manage the exposure of the different foundations, they will be classified in three lines: 1) positivistic reason; 2) proceduralist reason; 3) practical reason.
Keywords : Human rights; essentials rights; fallacy; true; positivistic reason; proceduralist reason; practical reason; metaphysics; anthropology.