Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Cited by Google
Similars in SciELO
Similars in Google
Share
Revista Colombiana de Psicología
Print version ISSN 0121-5469
Abstract
AGUILERA ONTIVEROS, ANTONIO and CONTRERAS MANRIQUE, JULIO C. A Logical-Formal Model for the Study of Emotional Arguments in Negotiation Processes. Rev. colomb. psicol. [online]. 2011, vol.20, n.2, pp.219-231. ISSN 0121-5469.
Arguments are part of a communicative process through which people try to influence the actions of others. Gilbert (1994) identifies four modes of argumentation: (a) logical, (b) emotional, (c) visceral, and (d) kisceral. Following the line of research in computational psychology proposed by Ortony, Clore and Collins (1988), and the model of conflict resolution using argumentation-based negotiations proposed by Jung and Tambe (2001), this paper presents a logical-formal model for studying of emotional arguments within the context of consensus building framed in negotiation and coordination processes.
Keywords : argumentation theory; emotional arguments; emotional consensus; formal methods in multi-agent systems; computational psychology.