SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue57EPISTEMOLOGY, REASONING AND COGNITION IN THE CONSTRUCTIVISM VS. RECONSTRUCTIVISM HISTORIOGRAPHICAL DEBATEHOW PRESENCING (ANWESEN) BECAME HEIDEGGER'S CONCEPT OF BEING author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Universitas Philosophica

Print version ISSN 0120-5323

Abstract

DAMSCHEN, Gregor. DISPOSITIONAL KNOWLEDGE-HOW VS. PROPOSITIONAL KNOWLEDGE-THAT. Univ. philos. [online]. 2011, vol.28, n.57, pp.189-212. ISSN 0120-5323.

Is knowledge-how a hidden knowledge-that, and therefore also a relation between an epistemic subject and a proposition? What is the connection between knowledge-how and knowledge-that? I will deal with both questions in the course of my paper. In the first part, I argue that the term 'knowledge-how' is an ambiguous term in a semantic pragmatic sense, blending two distinct meanings: 'knowledge-how' in the sense of knowledge-that, and 'knowledge-how' in the sense of an ability. In the second part of my paper, I construe five alternative ways of correlating knowledge-that and knowledge-how in the sense of an ability. I will argue in favour of one of them. I will show that knowledge-how is not a species of knowledge-that but rather that knowledge-that is a species of knowledge-how. More specifically, dispositional knowledge-how is at the core of propositional knowledge-that and accordingly should be understood to be at the center of epistemology.

Keywords : dispositional knowledge-how; propositional knowledge-that; ability; practical knowledge; epistemology.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )