Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Cited by Google
Similars in SciELO
Similars in Google
Share
Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia
Print version ISSN 0121-246X
Abstract
BONILLA LONDONO, Margarita María; BARRERA CHAPARRO, Judith Patricia; ARROYAVE GODOY, Angela Ptricia and DIAZ ROA, Mónica Eliana. REPRODUCIBILITY OF SOFT TISSUE CEPHALOMETRIC LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION BY CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL DIRECT RADIOGRAPHY. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq [online]. 2013, vol.25, n.1, pp.76-91. ISSN 0121-246X.
INTRODUCTION: there is little information on the reproducibility of soft tissue cephalometric points; the purpose of this study was then to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of soft tissue cephalometric landmark identification in direct digital radiography and conventional radiography. METHODS: 11 pairs of conventional and direct digital radiographs were introduced in the Cephapoint program. 10 cephalometric points were located on a Cartesian plane (X and Y) in conventional and digital images. The measurements were taken twice by 3 operators with 1 week interval. Interobserver average error was calculated in order to assess reproducibility in each point, and intraobserver error was used to determine accuracy. RESULTS: interobserver error in soft tissue cephalometric points was less than 1 mm for most points in both images, except in chin and pogonion, with no statistically significant differences. Statistically significant differences were found between the variances in the X axis, with less variability in the case of digital radiography in these points: labrale superius (p = 0.043), subnasale (p = 0, 013), columella (p = 0.038), stomion superius (p = 0.029), and stomion inferius (p = 0.015). The Y axis did not show statistically significant differences between the two methods. The assessment of intraobserver reproducibility showed an excellent Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (0.935) in both methods.. CONCLUSION: According to the findings of this study, the evaluated radiographs and methods offer similar diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords : cephalometry; results reproducibility; radiography; double-photon emission radiographic image.