Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Cited by Google
Similars in SciELO
Similars in Google
Share
Revista de Estudios Sociales
Print version ISSN 0123-885X
Abstract
LYNE, Mona. Bringing the Structure Back in: Limited Access Orders, “Extreme” ISI and Development. rev.estud.soc. [online]. 2019, n.68, pp.27-37. ISSN 0123-885X. https://doi.org/10.7440/res68.2019.03.
Structuralists highlighted politico-economic constraints on late development and advocated infant industry policies. In practice, highly distortionary implementation choices were near ubiquitous. Why did policymakers prefer this extreme policy? Employing North, Wallis & Weingast (2009), I argue politicians were constrained by a limited access order (LAO) to directly distribute production rights to powerful groups. “Extreme” ISI policies maximized politicians’ ability to directly distribute production rights; a milder policy meant replacing state-conferred rights with market mechanisms. I review representative “extreme” policies in Brazil, Chile and India, and then demonstrate their political efficacy in diversifying production rights that could be directly exchanged for elite support. Finally, I discuss the argument’s consistency with early structuralist emphasis on underlying politico-economic conditions as impediments to growth.
Keywords : Economic development; import substitution; infant industry; limited access order; patron-client networks; structuralism.