SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 issue33On the Perils of A.D. Smith’s Direct RealismImmunity to Error Through Misidentification: the Problem of Narrowing author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Discusiones Filosóficas

Print version ISSN 0124-6127

Abstract

DA CRUZ, Daniel Nery. The Problem of Moral Reasoning: Consequentialist and Deontological Criteria. discus.filos [online]. 2018, vol.19, n.33, pp.31-37. ISSN 0124-6127.  https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2018.19.33.3.

The text deals with the problem of moral reasoning or the criteria that allows to judge the correct from the incorrect action in the scope of ethical consequentialism and deontological morality. Once the two terms are defined, ethical utilitarianism will be taken as a classic example of moral consequentialism opposing to this perspective the Kantian deontological ethics. With these two theoretical parameters of morality, the discussion will focus on the assessment of problem cases, exploring the ethical issues they raise, evidencing the insufficiency of elucidating them only based on consequentialist principles and the moral of duty.

Keywords : Consequentialism; deontologism; intention; utilitarianism; moral obligation.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )