SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 issue2Assemblages of fishes in highland Andean reservoirs: The case of the Quebradona and Riogrande II reservoirs in the Magdalena basin author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Caldasia

Print version ISSN 0366-5232On-line version ISSN 2357-3759

Caldasia vol.44 no.2 Bogotá May/Aug. 2022  Epub May 24, 2024

https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v44n2.93314 

Notas breves

Notes on the floral sexuality of some species of the tree genus Triplaris (Polygonaceae)

Notas sobre la sexualidad floral de algunas especies del género arbóreo Triplaris (Polygonaceae)

Daniel Mark Koenemann1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-6994

1 Biology Department - Howard University - USA. Daniel. Koenemann@protonmail.com.


ABSTRACT

The majority of angiosperms (~94 %) are synoecious, with only a small minority separating the production of the two gamete types onto different biological individuals (dioecy). For many plant species, however, reproductive systems and habits are not well documented. This is particularly true of tropical trees, which, despite their conspicuity, are poorly understood. Plants in the genus Triplaris have been consistently described as strictly dioecious. After morphologic analysis using a dissecting microscope, here I present a number of fully-formed perfect (hermaphroditic) flowers observed on Triplaris herbaria specimens.

Keywords: Dioecy; Reproductive Biology

RESUMEN

La mayoría de las angiospermas (~94 %) son sinóicas, y sólo una pequeña minoría separa la producción de los dos tipos de gametos en distintos individuos biológicos (dioica). Sin embargo, los sistemas y hábitos reproductivos de muchas especies vegetales no están bien documentados. Esto es particularmente cierto en el caso de los árboles tropicales, que, a pesar de su conspicuidad, son poco conocidos. Las plantas del género Triplaris han sido descritas sistemáticamente como estrictamente dioicas. Luego del estudio morfológico utilizando un microscopio de disección, presento la observación de un número de flores perfectas (hermnafroditas) completamente formadas observadas en especímenes de herbario pertenecientes al género Triplaris.

Palabras clave: Dioecia; Biología reproductiva

INTRODUCTION

Dioecy is believed to have evolved as a way to ensure outcrossing (Ming et al. 2011, Barrett 2013, Renner 2014), but is also associated with a variety of other traits including occurrence at high elevations, woody habit, fleshy fruit, and wind pollination syndrome (Bawa 1980, Givnish 1980, Fox 1985, Bullock 1994, Renner and Ricklefs 1995, Renner and Won 2001, Renner 2014). Yet, for most tropical tree species, reproductive life history traits are speculative (e.g. generalized pollination syndromes) or unknown. This ignorance creates a significant impediment to, among other things, ecological studies and conservation efforts.

A great debt is owed to Kamal Bawa for beginning the long task of describing the reproductive and breeding systems of tropical trees (inter alia:Bawa 1974, Bawa and Opler 1975, Bawa et al. 1985a, b). Among the genera treated by Bawa, was Triplaris Loefl. (Polygonaceae), a collection of 18 species of fast-growing trees best known for their symbiosis with ants (Brandbyge 1986, Brandbyge 1990, Burke and Sanchez 2011, Sanchez 2015). Triplaris has consistently been characterized as dioecious. Meisner (1856) noted that the Polygonaceous subtribe Triplarideae contained some hermaphroditic species, but that this was not the case for Triplaris itself. Studies of tropical tree reproduction in the middle 20th Century confirmed the designation of Triplaris as dioecious (Bawa 1974, Bawa and Opler 1975, Melampy and Howe 1977, Opler and Bawa 1978). The most recent work has also described trees in the genus as dioecious (Brandbyge 1984, Brandbyge 1990, Wei and Dick 2014), in some cases specifying "strictly dioecious" (Brandbyge and Øllgaard 1984, Brandbyge 1986), to rule out the possibility of leaky dioecy (the irregular appearance of bisexual flowers in an otherwise dioecious system) or occasional monoecy. Brandbyge (1986) did, however, state that "rudimentary staminodia arising from the disc at the base of the gynoecium are occasionally present". In the case of Triplaris, these staminodia are the bases of the anther filaments. Thus, Brandbyge (1986) maintained the designation of trees in the genus as strictly dioecious.

No specimen of Triplaris has yet been collected that is known to document connected male and female inflorescences (which would indicate monoecy) or perfect (bisexual/hermaphroditic) flowers (which would indicate synoecy, 'leaky dioecy', or something more complex). I here document the observation of a number of fully-formed perfect (hermaphroditic) flowers from Triplaris herbaria specimens uncovered over the course of a separate morphometrics study.

METHODS

I aggregated herbarium specimens of Triplaris from the New York Botanical Garden Herbarium (NY), the United States National Herbarium (US), and the Wake Forest University Herbarium (WFU). I examined flowers using a stereo microscope with variable magnification (Nikon SMZ445). I examined at least three flowers on each specimen. Where necessary, I manipulated flowers and fruits using probes and tweezers to obtain better views of the androecium and gynoecium. I considered unisexual flowers those that presented only a single set of fully-formed reproductive structures, either male (stamens) or female (pistils). I also considered unisexual those flowers that presented one set of fully formed reproductive structures along with an underdeveloped or partially developed set of the other reproductive structures (e.g. fully formed pistils along with partial stamen filaments but no anthers, i.e. staminodia). I considered flowers bisexual (perfect/ hermaphroditic) that presented both sets of fully-formed reproductive structures, i.e. fully-formed pistils with the characteristic plumose stigmatic surface, along with fully formed stamens with anthers containing pollen.

Pistils of all of the flowers examined were both discolored and desiccated, making it impossible for me to check for ovule development. Similarly, I did not assess pollen viability. While there is debate over the best way to assess pollen viability and longevity (Firmage and Dafni 2001), pollen longevity and viability are generally measured on the scale of hours after anther dehiscence (Pacini and Franchi 2020). The same is true of stigma receptivity. As a result, neither stigma receptivity nor pollen viability were evaluated here, as the herbarium specimens were too old for those measures to be meaningful.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In total, 494 herbaria specimens of Triplaris were examined. No specimen presented only bisexual flowers. Six specimens presented a minority of morphologically bisexual flowers situated among unisexual flowers (Fig. 1, Table 1), representing approximately 1 % (six out of 494) of the specimens examined. These bisexual flowers presented fully formed pistils with the characteristic plumose stigmas, along with fully formed anthers that contained pollen (Fig. 1). Additionally, I observed female flowers with st-aminodes on Triplaris americana L. (two specimens), Triplaris melaenodendron (Bertol.) Standl. & Steyerm. (one specimen), and Triplaris vestita Rusby (one specimen). I have not presented the details of these specimens here as they do not represent novel findings (Brandbyge 1986).

Figure 1 Image of a bisexual flower of Triplaris melaenodendron subsp. colombiana (US-3223984). 

Table 1 Specimens of Triplaris that presented bisexual flowers. 

Despite the small proportion of specimens that presented bisexual flowers, the discovery of such flowers represents a change in the understanding of floral sexuality in the genus. Whereas staminodia without anthers have been documented in the genus (Brandbyge 1986), morphologically bisexual flowers have not.

Questions remain about the functionality of the floral parts. Due to the age of the specimens, I was only able to verify the full formation of gross morphology. Future field and/or anatomic studies should check bisexual flowers for pollen viability, stigma receptivity, and ovule development. Triplaris melaenodendron subsp. colombiana (Meisn.) Brandbyge seems to be the best candidate for such future studies. All of the specimens of T. melaenodendron subsp. colombiana presenting bisexual flowers were collected in Colombia (Table 1) and at altitudes between 500 m and 1000 m, toward the upper limit of where Triplaris is known to grow.

Polygamodioecy (the stable occurrence of bisexual flowers on both male and female plants in an otherwise dioecious system) has been documented in other tropical, woody Polygonaceae such as Coccoloba, that were historically thought to be dioecious (Madriz and Ramírez 1996-1997). While the sample presented here is too small to make any definitive statements about the sexual systems in Triplaris, researchers should be open to the idea that further observations may reveal the operative sexual system in some species of Triplaris to be more complicated than strict dioecy.

In conclusion, this short paper serves to revise the characterization of Triplaris flowers as strictly unisexual. Further work should be done to examine the functionality of floral parts in natural populations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Funding from the Howard University Graduate School, Ernest E. Just-Percy L. Julian Graduate Research Assist-antship helped make this work possible. The author would like to thank M. Pace, A. Weiss, and L. Klebieko of the New York Botanic Garden (NY), L. Dorr of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (US), and J. Pease of Wake Forest University (WFU) for access to physical specimens. The author would like to thank A. Sanchez of the Universidad del Rosario (Colombia) for access to her Triplaris collections and notes.

LITERATURE CITED

Barrett SCH. 2013. The evolution of plant reproductive systems: how often are transitions irreversible? Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B. 280:20130913. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0913Links ]

Bawa KS. 1974. Breeding systems of tree species of a lowland tropical community. Evolution 28(1)85-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1974.tb00729.xLinks ]

Bawa KS. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11:15-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.000311Links ]

Bawa KS, Opler PA. 1975. Dioecism in tropical forest trees. Evolution 29(1):167-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975. tb00824.xLinks ]

Bawa KS, Bullock SH, Perry DR, Coville RE, Grayum MH. 1985a. Reproductive biology of tropical lowland rainforest trees. II. Pollination systems. Am. J. Bot. 72(3):346-356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1985.tb05358.xLinks ]

Bawa KS, Perry DR, Beach JH. 1985b. Reproductive biology of tropical lowland rainforest trees. I. Sexual systems and incompatibility mechanisms. Am. J. Bot. 72(3):331-345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1985.tb05357.xLinks ]

Brandbyge J. 1984. Three new species of the genus Triplaris (Polygonaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 4(6):761-764. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1984.tb02006.xLinks ]

Brandbyge J. 1986. A revision of the genus Triplaris (Polygonaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 6(5)545-569. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1986.tb00454.xLinks ]

Brandbyge J. 1990. Woody Polygonaceae from Brazil: new species and a new interpretation. Nord. J. Bot. 10(2):155-160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1990.tb01763.xLinks ]

Brandbyge J, Øllgaard B. 1984. Inflorescence structure and generic delimitation of Triplaris and Ruprechtia (Polygonaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 4(6)765-769. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1984.tb02007.xLinks ]

Bullock SH. 1994. Wind pollination of Neotropical dioecious trees. Biotropica 26(2)172-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388806Links ]

Burke JM, Sanchez A. 2011. Revised subfamily classification for Polygonaceae, with a tribal classification for Eriogonoide-ae. Brittonia 63:510-520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12228-011-9197-xLinks ]

Firmage DH, Dafni A. 2001. Field tests for pollen viability: a comparative approach. Acta Hortic. 561:87-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.561.13Links ]

Fox JF. 1985. Incidence of dioecy in relation to growth form, pollination and dispersal. Oecologia 67:244-249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384293Links ]

Givnish TJ. 1980. Ecological constraints on the evolution of breeding systems in seed plants: dioecy and dispersal in gymnosperms. Evolution 34(5):959-972. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2408001Links ]

Madriz R, Ramírez N. 1996-1997. Biología reproductiva de Coccoloba uvifera (Polygonaceae) una especie poligamo-dioica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 44/45:105-115. [ Links ]

Meisner CF. 1856. Polygonaceae. In: Candolle A, editor. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis. Paris. 14:1-186. [ Links ]

Ming R, Bendahmane A, Renner SS. 2011. Sex chromosomes in land plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62:485-514. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103914Links ]

Melampy MN, Howe HF. 1977. Sex ratio in the tropical tree Tri-plaris americana (Polygonaceae). Evolution 31(4):867-872. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2407449Links ]

Opler PA, Bawa KS. 1978. Sex ratios in tropical forest trees. Evolution 32(4):812-821. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2407496Links ]

Pacini E, Franchi GG. 2020. Pollen biodiversity - why are pollen grains different despite having the same function? A review. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 193(2):141-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boaa014Links ]

Renner SS. 2014. The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. Am. J. Bot. 101(10):1588-1596. doi: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400196Links ]

Renner SS, Ricklefs RE. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 82(5):596-606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb11504.xLinks ]

Renner SS, Won H. 2001. Repeated evolution of dioecy from monoecy in Siparunaceae (Laurales). Syst. Biol. 50(5):700-712. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/106351501753328820Links ]

Sanchez A. 2015. Fidelity and promiscuity in an ant-plant mutualism: a case study of Triplaris and Pseudomyrmex. Plos One. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143535Links ]

Wei N, Dick CW. 2014. Polymorphic microsatellite markers for a wind-dispersed tropical tree species, Triplaris cumingiana (Polygonaceae) . Appl. Plant Sci. 2(9)1400051. doi: https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400051Links ]

Citation: Koenemann DM. 2022. Notes on the floral sexuality of some species of the tree genus Triplaris (Polygonaceae). Caldasia 44(2):453-457. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v44n2.93314

Received: February 22, 2021; Accepted: August 12, 2021; Accepted: August 17, 2021

* Corresponding author.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License