SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 issue24Three perspectives regarding justice: Calicles, Protagoras myth and the noble Socratic lieFrom transitions to stagnation. Revisiting democratization in the work of Guillermo O'Donnell author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Co-herencia

Print version ISSN 1794-5887

Abstract

BOHMAN, James. The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy . Co-herencia [online]. 2016, vol.13, n.24, pp.105-143. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.13.24.5.

I will be reviewing three different ways in which the making the problem of how this ideal would be approximated increasingly central in societies characterized by deep disagreements, social problems of enormous complexity and also consider the blunt instruments of available institutions. First, theories of deliberative democracy have come to emphasize the process of deliberation itself, rather than its ideal and counterfactual conditions and procedures. Second, deliberative democrats have become increasingly interested in the problems of institutionalization, of making institutions such as voting and majority rule, representation, courts and constitutional law more deliberative rather than rejecting them for more direct democracy. Third, these aforementioned democrats are concerned with examining and comparing different settings and procedures of deliberation, pointing out empirical problems and obstacles that cannot always be anticipated by conceptual argument alone.

Keywords : Deliberative democracy; epistemic justification; deliberative institutions; empirical problems.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )