SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue32Critical Agent, Deliberative Democracy, and Reason-GivingSocial Mobilization and Deliberation The Collective Action Frame as the Conclusion of a Deliberative Dialogue author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Co-herencia

Print version ISSN 1794-5887

Abstract

MARRAUD, Hubert. Deliberation and Collective Identity Compromising, Directive, and Expressive Uses of Argumentation. Co-herencia [online]. 2020, vol.17, n.32, pp.67-95. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.3.

The prevailing conception of argumentation continues to favor the representational dimension of language and, therefore, ignores or underestimates the compromising, directive, or expressive functions of argumentation. This paper examines the uses of argumentation in the public arena, focusing on deliberation and negotiation in particular, to bring to light and assert the importance of the non-persuasive roles of argumentation, including social identity construction and modeling.

Keywords : Argument functions; collective agency; deliberation; dialogue; practical reasoning; social identity; speech act; weighing.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )