Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Share
Revista Colombiana de Bioética
Print version ISSN 1900-6896On-line version ISSN 2590-9452
Abstract
GAYOZZO, Piero. Empirical bioethics and human enhancement: a methodological proposal. Rev. colomb. bioét. [online]. 2022, vol.17, n.2, e07. Epub Jan 18, 2024. ISSN 1900-6896. https://doi.org/10.18270/rcb.v17i2.3501.
Purpose/Background.
The present research focuses on the debate on transhumanism/bioconservatism from the perspective of empirical bioethics, that is, making use of empirical evidence in the process of moral reasoning. Its objective is to propose a methodological guide for the approach and resolution of moral problems concerning human enhancement.
Methodology/Approach.
The method Step-wise Ethical Human Enhancemet (SWEH) is proposed. It is a guide consisting of 11 questions that are the result of the adaptation of the guidelines for identifying a human enhancement procedure as ethical developed by Julian Savulescu to the method of Step-wise Empirical Contributions elaborated by Pascal Borry. An applicative example on the morality of biohacking RFID implants is provided.
Results/Findings.
SWEH proposes that human enhancement procedures might be approached as specific problems and that the identified moral norm might be rewritten as a descriptive proposition that serves as a hypothesis that will be evaluated in the light of empirical evidence. The evaluation of the proposition, and thus of moral reasoning, will be done with the help of the information gathered by the 11 questions.
Discussion/Conclusions/Contributions.
SWEH can serve to provide a first answer on the morality of a specific human enhancement procedure, but not an absolute one, as the result may vary depending on the information obtained in the future. It also highlights gaps in empirical research related to the procedure it addresses. The method is a first methodological guide that could be revised and improved.
Keywords : Bioethics; empirical research; methodology; morality; risk; technology.