SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue13THE ETHICS OF DISCOURSE IN THE FACE OF THE CHALLENGE OF (NEO)POPULISM IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE RADICALIZATION OF DEMOCRACYPROTESTANT CITIZENSHIP AND MORAL DISSIDENCE: THE ROLE OF THE RELIGIOUS PRESS IN THE DEBATE ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM BETWEEN 1946 AND 1953 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


CS

Print version ISSN 2011-0324

Abstract

MEDINA BOTEROANCLA, HERNÁN. DIALOGUE AND INCLUSION: A MORAL DECISION. CS [online]. 2014, n.13, pp.85-110. ISSN 2011-0324.  https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i13.1822.

This article presents some of the characteristic features which, in the context of deliberative politics, can be highlighted within the inclusive function of dialogue as suggested by authors such as Jürgen Habermas and Richard Rorty. In addition to reviewing the ideas of these authors, it will demonstrate that the process of inclusion cannot be achieved simply through dialogue, but that a conscious decision must be made that leads to a broadening of moral and conversational limitations in order to make inclusion possible. This type of decision is exemplified by the peace talks between the Colombian government and the guerrillas of the FARC in Havana, Cuba.

Keywords : Dialogue; inclusion; moral; the peace process.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )