SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.3 issue2What is vocology?Impact on the quality of life of the treatment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia with botulinum toxin A author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de investigación e innovación en ciencias de la salud

On-line version ISSN 2665-2056

Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud vol.3 no.2 Medellín July/Dec. 2021  Epub Dec 03, 2021

https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.57 

Research article

Pansori today: aesthetic demands vs. vocal health

Pansori hoy: demandas estéticas vs. salud vocal

1 Associazione E.U.R.E.C.A.; Marta (VT); Italy.

2Italian National Institute of Statistics; Roma; Italy.

3Graduate School of Performing Arts; Hongik University; Seoul; South Korea.

4Chair, Performing Arts Medicine Dept; CEIMARS - Italian interdisciplinary Center for Performing Arts Medicine; Agrigento; Italy.


Abstract

Introduction:

Pansori is a traditional Korean dramatic art form, which likely appeared in the mid-eighteenth century in the southern region of Korea. In pansori there is a strong inclination toward preserving tradition, especially in regard to training, which is generally considered particularly demanding in terms of risks to vocal health. Nevertheless -as highlighted by recent studies- some innovations took place in pansori characteristics and performances in the last few decades.

Objective:

We hypothesize that these innovations have impacted the attitudes of singers and teachers towards pansori training and vocal health issues, and that a new approach to voice training in pansori might be recommended.

Method:

Starting with recent evolutions of pansori and considering previous studies, we discuss how these changes might produce innovations -or at least a demand for innovation- in pansori’s training. We also try to capture the viewpoint of pansori students and performers, through an anonymous survey.

Results:

Although further investigation is required, the results suggest that a new approach in teaching pansori is emerging and it is increasingly requested by the trainee performers, despite some criticisms from traditionalists.

Conclusion:

Unlike previously thought, perhaps a more scientific and health-conscious approach to pansori voice training will be something from which many pansori singers can benefit.

Keywords: Pansori; voice pedagogy; changgeuk; folksongs; voice training; vocal health; hoarseness; singers; voice disorders; survey

Resumen

Introducción:

Pansori es una forma de arte dramático tradicional coreano que probablemente apareció a mediados del siglo XVIII en la región sur de Corea. En pansori hay una fuerte inclinación a preservar la tradición, especialmente en lo que respecta al entrenamiento, que generalmente se considera particularmente exigente en términos de riesgos para la salud vocal. Sin embargo, como destacan estudios recientes, se produjeron algunas innovaciones en las características y actuaciones del pansori en las últimas décadas.

Objetivo:

Hipotetizamos que estas innovaciones han impactado las actitudes de cantantes y profesores hacia la formación del pansori y los problemas de salud vocal, y que podría recomendarse un nuevo enfoque para el entrenamiento de la voz en pansori.

Método:

Comenzando con las evoluciones recientes de pansori y considerando estudios previos, discutimos cómo estos cambios pueden producir innovaciones, o al menos una demanda de innovación, en la formación de pansori. También tratamos de captar el punto de vista de los estudiantes e intérpretes de pansori, a través de una encuesta anónima.

Resultados:

Aunque se requiere más investigación, los resultados sugieren que está surgiendo un nuevo enfoque en la enseñanza del pansori y es cada vez más solicitado por los artistas en formación, a pesar de algunas críticas de los tradicionalistas.

Conclusión:

A diferencia de lo que se pensaba anteriormente, quizás un enfoque más científico y consciente de la salud para el entrenamiento de la voz en pansori será algo de lo que muchos cantantes de pansori puedan beneficiarse.

Palabras clave: Pansori; pedagogía de la voz; changgeuk; canciones populares; entrenamiento de la voz; salud vocal; ronquera; cantantes; trastornos de la voz; encuesta.

Introduction

Pansori (sometimes spelled ‘p’ansori’, depending on the romanization system used)1 is a type of traditional dramatic art, which is thought to have appeared in Korea in the mid-eighteenth century. In 1964, the Korean Ministry of Culture designated pansori as an Intangible Cultural Asset.

Explained by some as “one-man opera” [1 p227], or “solo-singer type of story-telling” [2 p122], it is performed in its traditional form by a solo vocalist with the accompaniment of a drum (puk), alternating spoken (aniri) to sung (chang) passages to tell folktales, playing the role of the narrator and of all the characters in the story. The original repertoire of pansori consisted of 12 pieces, but only 5 of them have been passed on to contemporary performers. A pansori performance can last up to 8 hours and was originally performed predominantly outdoors, in parks or courtyards. However, pansori is currently performed mostly indoors, in concert halls or theatres [3], and new forms of performances subsequently appeared, such as new pansori (pansori created since the beginning of the twentieth century and therefore not belonging to the traditional repertoire mentioned before), changgeuk (a fully staged form of pansori, performed in theatres with different actors playing different roles, costumes, an orchestra, etc.), and other forms that will be discussed in the second section of this article.

Today, pansori is performed and appreciated not only in Korea, but also in many other countries. Scientific investigations have been dedicated to pansori, analyzing its features from different perspectives -artistic, historical, anthropological, etc. In particular, many studies have dealt with artistic and vocal issues related to pansori, unsurprisingly, because of the peculiar vocal technique adopted.

In these studies, a number of widely accepted findings about vocal training, vocal health, and vocal technique in pansori arise. Mainly: pansori has a very specific sound; it can be achieved only after years of demanding training that may result in damage to the vocal cords of the students; training is based on non-codified mimetic techniques passed on through a strong master-disciple relationship.

Although its strong traditional component is still a crucial aspect, in recent years pansori has also integrated some modern innovations, which have -to some extent- addressed important issues, such as the working circumstances of the performers and the incorporation of alternative artistic forms of pansori performances.

Despite these changes, the pedagogy of pansori has not had many significant modifications since its origin.

Furthermore, although several studies have highlighted the expressive evolution of pansori, it is mostly taken for granted that the traditional vocal requirements of pansori are still valid, despite the vocal risks. There has been very little attention given to the importance of vocal quality and health for performance beyond those traditional requirements of the pansori singers’ training.

It has been noted that the repeated production of the particular sounds of pansori is often associated with vocal damage [4-7]. However, in the commonly accepted view, this is simply necessary in order to become a pansori singer.

This view makes two assumptions: 1) these sounds are essential for the pansori performance and, therefore, the consequent vocal damage due to the training is an unavoidable requirement for a good performance; 2) pansori students and performers do not know the risks of the training or do not consider vocal health very important.

Both of these assumptions may need to be adjusted, given the recent and continuous evolutions occurring in the world of pansori.

To investigate, we decided to look at the points of view of pansori students and performers, highlighting and evaluating the opinions of those who are involved in the training, by designing and submitting to them an anonymous survey. We wanted to understand whether -and to what extent- changes in the performance and in the working circumstances of pansori have altered how performers and teachers perceive the importance of vocal health and the impact of vocal disorders in their overall life and work. We were interested in learning whether the responses in this survey would suggest a need for a change in the training of pansori.

The results of our investigation are presented and explained in the following sections of the article, supported by figures (graphs). The relevant parts of the survey and the answers collected are presented in detail in Appendix A. We are keen to note that these results -with particular regard to the two assumptions previously mentioned- are quite surprising, especially if we compare them to the commonly accepted view of this subject.

The survey was supported by an interview with a young expert teacher of pansori, who pointed out how a new view of the pedagogy and the specific features of pansori has been emerging and that this view is not always in line with the prevalent, more traditional approach.

Although the interview is transcribed in Appendix B, we decided to detail the most relevant passages in the body of the article when they are particularly useful in understanding the intrinsic evolution of pansori from the point of view of performers or in support of the results emerging from the survey.

In addition to this interview, a comparison of previous studies is also provided in order to highlight the main steps of the evolution of pansori and to hypothesize the object of our investigation. The main findings of these previous studies are tabulated in Appendix C and detailed information about changes that have been occurring in the evolution of pansori are given in the article.

Methods

The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is a need to update the training of pansori performers with special attention given to vocal health. The investigation included three different strategies.

Previous studies

Through a literature review, we analyzed the evolution of pansori, highlighting its most traditional aspects and the main changes that have occurred, pointing out how these changes might have produced a demand for innovations within the training. This preliminary analysis has also been useful in order to further specify our initial hypothesis and aim.

Many studies have analyzed pansori in its social, anthropological, historical, and musical aspects. Far fewer have analyzed the acoustics of pansori and the associated physiology involved. Only a few provided details of the pedagogy of pansori (see references). However, there is a general agreement regarding the crucial consequences of training and vocal health, i.e., that pansori would require a peculiar husky and hoarse voice quality that is obtained after years of severe training, which aims to damage the vocal cords of the students in order to obtain the required sound.

A comparative analysis of several studies enabled us to highlight some important conclusions and to form some preliminary hypotheses. Appendix C shows the main findings that we took into consideration for our work, divided into three different relevant aspects: history and evolution of pansori, training in pansori, voice quality and its acoustic and medical analysis.

Comparing these main findings, it is evident that while scholars point out a continuous evolution of pansori and its forms of performance, little evolution of its training has been noted or reported. Furthermore, many scholars agree about the frequent (and, for some, unavoidable) vocal damage among pansori singers. This led us to investigate whether the evolution of pansori has changed the perception of the importance of vocal health in the new generations of singers and teachers and, consequently, the requirements of its pedagogy.

Survey

We designed a survey in order to investigate the viewpoints of pansori singers about crucial aspects of its characteristics and training, with specific attention given to the comparison between innovations that have occurred in pansori and how it is traditionally viewed and perceived. We submitted an anonymous survey to pansori performers, using the CAWI (Computer Assisted Web Interview) technique, in order to investigate their perceptions of the importance of vocal health, of the efficiency of their previous training according to their working needs, and the impact of vocal damage and fatigue on their overall life and work (which may be intrinsic to pansori and unavoidable, especially in training).

Due to the relatively small number of respondents, descriptive statistics were used to analyze and present the data. Although further and more detailed analyses are required, the study gives surprising results about a new point of view that may be an important reference for further research -a point of view that focuses on the performers’ opinions and perceptions, which is something still relatively unexplored, especially with regards to new generations.

The survey was developed by the authors of this paper in order to evaluate how performers and teachers perceive the importance of vocal health and the impact of vocal disorders in their overall life and work. Additionally, the survey investigates their beliefs about some widely accepted characteristics of pansori. It consists of 22 closed-ended questions asked in the Korean language. It was spread by word of mouth among pansori students, teachers, and performers. Data collection lasted approximately one month, and the total number of respondents was 41; all the responders answered all the questions in the survey, so there were no changes in the number of respondents during the data collection process. However, question 6 of the survey was addressed only to the responders who perform in changgeuk, either as an exclusive activity or in addition to traditional pansori (28 responders out of 41).

The survey was completed anonymously in order to preserve the privacy of the interviewees. An anonymous survey also allowed us to deal with two facts, which might have affected the quality of the responses: 1) the close master-disciple relationship and the conservative environment around pansori could represent an obstacle for the honesty of singers who would not have wanted to hurt or offend their mentors; 2) some participants might be skeptical toward foreign research, especially if dealing with potential voice damage caused by pansori traditional training and performance. The latter consideration also led us to paying particular attention to avoid an inquisitorial tone in phrasing the survey’s questions.

Computer-assisted web interviewing (CAWI) was chosen as the surveying technique. It presented the best choice for addressing statistical quality issues and guaranteeing the survey’s feasibility. The relatively small number of respondents allowed us to produce only descriptive statistics.

The main topics on which the survey has been designed are the following: 1) whether pansori singers perform and/or study other musical genres or new forms of performance (e.g., changgeuk); 2) beliefs about certain well-known characteristics of pansori performing and pedagogy; 3) the perception of the relationship between pansori and vocal health, and, accordingly, the importance that pansori singers assign to vocal health.

The results of the survey are presented, explained and discussed below. Appendix A shows all the questions and answers (translated for Korean to English), as well as graphs in order to facilitate reading the data.

A young teacher’s point of view

Watching live performances or listening to recent recordings of pansori, especially in its fully staged form (called changgeuk), we noticed that not all the voices heard on stage sounded breathy or hoarse. Different performers used varying degrees of hoarseness, even though many scholars pointed out that hoarseness and breathiness have always been important requirements of the voice quality used in pansori.

To gain an expert point of view about teaching pansori and the related voice production issues, we interviewed Moon SooHyun, a professional pansori performer in her late thirties, which is considered young for a pansori performer. She has won two national competitions: the Korean Traditional Music Association and the Namdo Folksong Competition. At the moment of the interview (2018), she was a teacher at Chung-Ang University (regarded as one of the top Universities in Korea offering degrees in pansori), and she was a guest instructor at TBS efm (Sounds of Korea). In addition, she was a pansori instructor at National Theater of Korea’s Traditional Performing Arts Academy for Foreigners, and occasionally leads introductory workshops for foreigners at Bukchon Traditional Culture Center (see Appendix D).

Moon SooHyun shared her perspectives from the inside of the world of pansori. Her contributions proved important for the purposes of our study [8], in part because she teaches Koreans as well as non-Koreans and she represents the younger generation of both teachers and singers. Many other studies only incorporate interviews with master singers and teachers from previous generations.

Results

Previous analyses of pansori seem to highlight the importance of hoarseness and voice disorders in order to achieve the unique tonal quality that is attained after years of demanding training. The balance between vocal health and artistry in pansori seems to be both challenging and controversial. Training in pansori is based on mimetic training and it has not changed significantly since its origins. However, through an anonymous survey submitted to 41 pansori singers, we have noticed that a new tendency is appearing. A cleaner sound is more accepted than it has been historically, and hoarseness does not seem to be an essential requirement neither for the essential expression of han (an emotion often defined as “sorrow”, that fulfills the majority of Korean artistic production) nor in considering whether a performer is good; there is much more attention paid to vocal health, as many of our interviewees are concerned about it and experience some discomfort in their life and work attributable to voice disorders.

This might be due to the ongoing evolution of pansori that now includes more western influences and new forms of performance with new accompaniments that create potential challenges for singing according with the traditional pansori style. Most of our interviewees perform in western-derived musical styles, but they would be prevented from doing so by having an unhealthy voice. Changgeuk is a very popular fully staged form of pansori that not only involves the majority of pansori singers, but it is an important part of their job, and it also contributes to the definition of the voice quality due to its popularity, and it also has technical requirements that the traditional training in pansori does not address.

As the results of the survey show, this evolution has changed the attitudes of performers towards vocal health and this might suggest a change in the way pansori performers are trained.

Discussion

A specific voice quality with unique acoustic and physiological characteristics and some vocal health issues: han in pansori

An important concept needed to understand voice production in pansori is the notion of han, which fulfills the majority of Korean artistic production in many different fields, including pansori.

When asking Koreans “what is han?”, they would likely answer that it is impossible to explain to foreigners, since it is a typical Korean emotion that includes historical memories of invasions, wars, famines, and other problems that contributed to a collective trauma and a national feeling of grief. It has been reported that han is a relatively recent idea in Korean culture, first appearing during the Japanese colonial period following the treaty of 1876 [9].

Han seems to be one of the most important expressive elements when singing intense and dramatic moments of pansori. Although it is not consistently used in all of the repertoire, it is expected that han will be expressed at some point in a pansori performance. The movie Seopyeonje and its popular musical theatre adaptation beautifully illustrate the importance of this emotion in pansori. Han is often defined as ‘sorrow’, though Moon SooHyun points out that it is rather “repressed sorrow”2 (see Appendix B).

Seongeum, the voice quality in pansori and relative importance of hoarseness: is this ‘han’ in voice?

Teaching such an undefined sentiment creates problems in pedagogy and voice technique. We asked Moon SooHyun: “how would you express han in your voice?”

This is actually the most difficult question. I’m sure that every singer has a different idea about han. I can share with you my personal thoughts, though. We use the word ‘seongeum’ to define the tone color of pansori. This is the most important thing that a pansori singer must achieve: the particular tone color. That seongeum will come to singers who have a drastic training for a long time or [have] special talent. And that color expresses han. This means that han is not a technique, but the color that the singers have, that is influenced by their life. So, if the singers have suffered or they have much repressed sorrow in their life, their voice color would be great. That’s why older generations are much more talented than younger generations, even though I think it’s not only a matter of quantity of han, but also of kind of han. New generations have a different han, they experience different kinds of sorrow. (Moon SooHyun’s personal interview, 2018; Appendix B).

Many other scholars, performers, and teachers point out that the ‘tone color’ or ‘voice quality’ is the most essential thing in pansori [10,11]. This quality is very particular and it is said that it is only attained after years of severe and demanding training. However, while most attempt to describe it from a perceptual and subjective point of view, there are very few studies on the objective acoustics and physiology of this voice quality.

Moon Seung-Jae of Ajou University conducted two valuable analyses on acoustic characteristics of pansori voice quality [4,12]. The following points summarize his conclusions:

  1. He noticed a relatively flat spectral slope3.

  2. Pansori singing has a uniquely identifiable vibrato, so different from the ‘western’ standard that he questions whether we should actually call it vibrato (confirmed by Hong, Kim H, and Kim S, 2006) [6].

  3. There is a prominent partial located lower than 1kHz.

  4. Most pansori singers’ voices sound hoarse.

  5. Some sounds, anticipated to be periodic, like vowels, are actually aperiodic.

  6. Some of these characteristics were present also in the speaking voice, which suggested that the source (vocal folds) had been changed permanently by an intensive training.

For the purposes of this study, points four and five are the most interesting (although we will discuss point six in the following chapter). The “aperiodicity” observed by Moon is often described by scholars as “typical husky sound”, “hoarse voice”, “rough sound”, etc. [10,11]. Others have reported high levels of jitter and shimmer in pansori voices4 [5], parameters often connected with hoarseness in voice [13]. Many also think that this hoarseness is actually han in voice. Willoughby tried to describe the musical and vocal features of han in pansori, and she concluded that among other factors, harshness has an important role in the expression of han [10]. Other studies have tried to describe the acoustic characteristics of han [14]. But is “harshness” actually aperiodicity? Is it “hoarseness”? Is it really important to have a “hoarse” voice in contemporary pansori?

Not really. It is not compulsory. I would never say that a pansori singer is bad just because he or she has a clear tone. Hoarseness comes naturally with age; nowadays, if the voice doesn’t get hoarse with age, the singer is even considered a better singer. (Moon SooHyun’s personal interview, 2018; see appendix B).

This surprising assumption seemed to contradict the common view of voice quality in pansori, so we asked the same question to our interviewees. Figure 1 and Table 1 show their answers (see also Appendix A). As noted below, hoarseness is important for only 27% of the interviewees, and not all of them use a hoarse voice on purpose.

Figure 1 Importance of hoarseness in pansori/changgeuk

Table 1 Use of hoarseness in performance 

(For those who assign any importance in having a hoarse voice) Do you ever sing with hoarse voice ON PURPOSE?
Yes 63.9%
No 36.1%
TOTAL 100.0%

To quantify the level of hoarseness required in pansori, we asked participants to rate the ideal level of hoarseness in pansori voice on a scale of one to ten, where one is a clear tone (not hoarse at all) and ten is a tone so hoarse that it is impossible to perceive the pitch. As Figure 2 shows, some interviewees answered 1 and some others answered 10, suggesting that there is a broad range of opinions about this aspect of the voice. However, when we asked them to give the minimum and the maximum levels of hoarseness, they gave us more even values (see Appendix A).

Figure 2 Ideal level of hoarseness in pansori voice. 

As the answers received from the interviewees and as Moon SooHyun suggested, the features of han, as well as of pansori itself, are not necessarily connected with hoarseness. Thus, they suggest that there is neither a direct correlation between hoarseness and han, nor between hoarseness and the appreciation of a singer’s skills.

Vocal health and physiology of pansori

Why is it so important to discuss hoarseness? As previously discussed, many scholars consider it an essential part of the pansori sound. Its connection with potential vocal health issues cause concern and require consideration that cannot be ignored in a contemporary pedagogical setting.

Hoarseness has been associated with voice disorders and it is an important factor taken into consideration in the majority of systems for perceptual evaluation of dysphonia, such as GRBAS scale [15,16] and the VHI -Voice Handicap Index [17-20].

In fact, pansori singers have often been diagnosed with severe voice disorders: researchers observed nodules, asymmetrical vocal folds, and damage to the mucosa that often required treatment. In some cases, problems were so significant, even after treatment, that the voice was no longer audible. Some concluded that this was the result of a non-scientific training method, dating back to the 18th century, which has only been transmitted orally [5-7].

Moon made almost the same conclusion (see point six of the summary, above), noting that many characteristics of pansori singers’ voices were also present in their speaking voices. He hypothesized that a permanent change occurred in their voice source (larynx and vocal folds) due to intensive training. This was the result of another important observation: pansori voice seemed to be “pressed” yet “breathy”, which suggests a physical change that prevents the vocal folds from closing, so that they can produce an “aperiodic noise under pressure” [12 p23]. However, it is important to note for our study that his research was based on recordings (rather than live performance) of five eminent and aged pansori singers, including two who were no longer alive at the time.

Pedagogy of pansori - The demanding training

In 1980, university courses in pansori were introduced in South Korea. However, it is commonly acknowledged that the university can only partially provide the students with the appropriate training that they need [21]. This is due to the universities providing limited contact time for pedagogical input and, therefore, the learning and performance outcomes of the trainees. Pansori singers start their training much earlier than when they enroll in college, usually when they are age 15 or 16 at the latest [21] (see also private interview to Moon SooHyun, Appendix C)

The way pansori is often taught is through mimetic techniques, even in universities, where students record the voice of their teachers and try to repeat what they do [22]. The techniques of pansori have traditionally been transmitted through this master-disciple relationship paradigm [23].

Appendix D offers an example of how Pansori is taught today, describing a one-day workshop that we observed in May 2018. Although this was a workshop for foreigners at the amateur level that was taught in English over the course of only one day, it still shows the general characteristics of the pedagogy of pansori and its training methodology (such as call-response and other mimetic techniques, attention given to different embellishments, etc.).

In the training of pansori, little attention is given to voice technique; most of the training is focused on artistic aspects, such as different “modes” (jo, scale or style) [24] or different embellishments. In fact, in pansori the word “voice technique” is often synonymous with “embellishment” rather than technical voice production [3]. Technical work is mostly focused on breathing, which is considered to be responsible for a powerful and loud sound [7], despite recent research indicating that breath is only partially responsible for the intensity of voice [25].

Part of the traditional training of pansori used to occur in the mountains, or in a natural environment, over 100 days. The legend says that students used to train their voices surrounded by waterfalls in order to develop loud sounds that could be heard over the noise of the water. Pihl described it like “a period of deprivation, of exhausting efforts to acquire ‘a voice’”, reporting that during this training, singers often spat blood from their mouths [23 p51].

Contemporary students still follow this tradition, but with less intensive training over a shorter time period: one week at the shortest, one month at the longest [2] (see also private interview to Moon SooHyun, Appendix B).

In spite of these historical reports, the vast majority of our interviewees (almost 71%) say that their training was not focused on producing a hoarse voice (Appendix A).

Is vocal health a real issue?

Some say that these voice disorders should not only be accepted, but encouraged by pansori singers [2,22,23]. The Western training is now more focused on preserving the vocal health of the students, so we might find this encouragement of disordered usage absurd.

However, the balance between the artistry of a sound and the vocal health of the singer is something that in this case can be very delicate. Only some have reported these voice disorders as a negative consequence of excessive vocal effort; others seem to agree that pansori singers have certain voice disorders that contribute to the unique aesthetic of the voice quality required by the genre [2,4,10-12,23].

Korean newspapers have reported on doctors making claims about singers losing their careers after surgery for voice disorders, or about singers who decided not to receive treatments for dysphonia even though their voices were becoming increasingly pathological.5

However, this idea may be changing, given that Table 2 reveals how important our interviewees consider vocal health for pansori singers.

Table 2 Importance of monitoring vocal health in pansori/changgeuk 

How much do you think it is important to monitor vocal health and to keep the voice healthy for those who had an excellent artistic training in Pansori/Changgeuk?
Very important 92.7%
Quite important 7.3%
Not very important 0.0%
Irrelevant 0.0%
TOTAL 100.0%

Is this the result of an increased level of attention to vocal health in general within the field of the performing arts? Is pansori evolving so much that hoarseness has become less important? Has the traditional role and the job of a pansori singer changed to include other styles of performances of musical genres? Singers today consider vocal health more important than singers from two or three hundred years ago, who used to sing outdoors in a traditional performance context accompanied by only a drum. Does this indicate that the pedagogy of pansori has changed according to these new views? We will answer these questions in the next sections of this article.

Evolution of Pansori

“‘Traditional pansori’ was designated as an Intangible Cultural Asset by the Korean Ministry of Culture in 1964 and was also proclaimed one of the UNESCO Masterpieces of Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity in 2003” [26 p26]. Even though it might seem that these attempts to preserve pansori are the expression of a generally conservative attitude, the reason why they occurred is that the evolution of pansori risked going too far.

Many scholars observed numerous changes in pansori due to its “encounter with modernity”. Some reported an evolution of the genre that elicits contrasting reactions from traditionalists and innovators [26]. Despite the contrasting reactions, the dialectic between innovation and conservation in pansori is clearly present.

The purpose of this study is not to take a position in this dialectic, saying whether the evolution of pansori is something to encourage or counteract. Our purpose is to report these changes and to see if they suggest that some adjustments in pansori technique and its pedagogy may be allowed as part of modern performance practice.

New venues and new audiences

One of the biggest changes that has occurred in pansori since its origin is in the venues where it is performed.

Originally performed outdoors, it was supposed to be heard “amidst the loud hurried crowds of the market-place” [22 p298]. More recently, pansori is performed in theatres or concert halls, sometimes even amplified by a microphone. As Yeonok Jang analyzed [3], this change had a huge impact on the response of the audiences during the performances and consequently on the performers’ attitude and on the performances themselves.

Therefore, the intensity originally required in pansori may now be considered optional, belonging more to the realm of art and style rather than that of an essential technical requirement of pansori.

New styles, new forms of performances, new perspectives, internationality of pansori

Throughout the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, pansori has undergone an evolution that has produced new forms of performance that coexist with more traditional styles and performances.

New accompaniments

In 1987, the first pansori performance with the accompaniment of a western ensemble took place. After that, even some of the oldest and most popular performers participated in various kinds of pansori performances accompanied by a western ensemble (although these performances are still relatively rare among traditional singers).

The most important consequence of these new accompaniments (for our purposes) is the lack of freedom in choosing the key of the song, in addition to the impact on the perception of tempo and management of speed. When only a drum accompanies the singer (as in the traditional form of pansori performance), the drummer adjusts his speed to that of the singer, and no melodic or harmonic references limit the choice of key. The singers are able to choose the most comfortable key and are free to adjust it according to their vocal condition or tiredness relative to their sensations and feelings [3].

New pansori

The original repertoire of pansori consisted of 12 pieces, but only five of them have been passed on to contemporary performers. They coincide with the five cardinal principles of Confucian ethics.

As Hae Kyung Um reported [26], in 1904 the very first piece of “new pansori” appeared. The term “new pansori” refers to pansori created since the beginning of the twentieth century and therefore does not belong to the original repertory (the five pieces). These new pieces and songs are compositions that are arranged, improvised, and performed according to the conventional musical styles, techniques, rhythms, and modes of traditional pansori. There are, however, new influences in text, music, performance style, and also production and consumption of performances. For example, they emphasize humor in contrast to the han of previous pieces, and they introduce a new language much closer to contemporary colloquial Korean, using a wider variety of regional accents. Many elements of popular culture (including Western culture) are added to these new performances.

These changes (less han and more humor, contemporary language, different dialects, Western influence, etc.) affect and modify the voice quality used in new pansori, and gives rise to controversies.

Although new pansori is gaining popularity among young audiences, more conservative people have voiced strong criticism. In spite of this, new pansori performers proudly claim that they are regaining the original spirit of pansori “as living art”, rallying against the fossilization of the art form following the 1964 declaration of pansori as a “national intangible cultural asset”. This statement is present in a declaration made on February 13, 2004, by a group of new pansori performers that call themselves National League of Ttorang Kwangdae. It is essential to explain the meaning of the word kwangdae, the relevance of this declaration and even of the name of the League itself:

Kwangdae and Ttorang Kwangdae. The word kwangdae refers to the professional pansori performers that have received their training and the acquisition of the repertoire and style from one of the major pansori schools or “proper” lineage of style. Ttorang kwangdae, instead, are those singers that do not belong to any of these schools and the word ttorang is generally used in a pejorative way to label those who are not likely to be able to attain the status of a “proper” performer. Ttorang kwangdae have not attained the seongeum, the sound or unique voice quality of pansori that is usually acquired after years of demanding vocal training. It is important to note that the artists of the League proudly used the term ttorang Kwangdae to define themselves and declare their intent to make pansori “regain a new life”, implicitly undermining the importance of the seongeum, and even highlighting the lack of this sound as a positive feature. The debate around new pansori is not only artistic, but political, cultural, and social. As a team of researchers, we have neither the right nor the knowledge to take part in this debate or align ourselves with one side or the other, but we are interested in reporting these changes that affect all forms of pansori. As Hae-Kyung Um observed in 2008:

It is perhaps too soon to predict where all these creative energies will lead. But one thing we could deduce from the dynamics of pansori development in modernity is that tradition and creativity are not only compatible with each other but inspire and give new life to artistic expression [26 p48].

In other words, it is likely that the importance of new pansori might have affected the form of performances of traditional pansori itself, especially in terms of voice quality, contributing to stimulate a continuous change of the preferences of the audience that is unavoidable and contribute to a certain evolution of every musical style.

Changgeuk

Korea didn’t have theatres until the beginning of the 20th century, more than a hundred years after the appearance of the first forms of pansori. For this reason, the role that was played by indigenous narrative theatrical forms in other Asian countries, such as Peking Opera in China or No, Joruri or Kabuki Theatre in Japan, was played by pansori in Korea.

However, when in the early 1900s the first theatre opened in Korea, a stage form of pansori, where different actors performed different roles, appeared. Gradually, costumes and sets were added, and this fully staged form of pansori became an independent genre where the singing style used by the performers is still pansori, even though the form of performance is considerably different from the traditional. The name of this new style is Changgeuk, and its popularity has been steadily increasing. Some consider it a “popular” form of pansori, as it attracts a big (and often younger) audience; most of the changgeuk are performed with English subtitles, indicating that the interest of non-Koreans in this form of performing art is increasingly important.

In changgeuk, unlike traditional pansori performances, a singer plays only one role. There are ensembles and choirs and the show is accompanied not only by a drum but by a whole orchestra. Even though it is usually comprised of traditional Korean instruments, it occasionally includes those from west.

Due to its popularity, changgeuk attracts many pansori performers, and it is an important (and lucrative) part of their job. As Appendix A and Figure 3 show, only one third of our interviewees perform exclusively pansori, while the majority of them perform in both genres. Only a small group of them perform exclusively in changgeuk.

Figure 3 Commitment in Changeeuk 

As Moon SooHyun highlighted during her interview, “Western culture affected changgeuk very much”, due to the fact that theatres in Korea are a consequence of the Western influence of the twentieth century [27], “especially in the acoustic system” (Appendix B); this is a crucial observation for our purposes of the analysis of the management of voice, because the traditional training of pansori is the only training that Changgeuk performers receive and it does not take into consideration a (relatively) new and western influenced type of performance. We will analyze this aspect in detail below.

Andrew P. Killick, senior lecturer in Ethnomusicology at University of Sheffield (UK), is one of the most published western scholars of changgeuk, and in his publications he highlights many interesting points about this form of art, that are relevant to our study: Killick explained that changgeuk is “traditionesque”, rather than ‘traditional’ and defines the distinction as follows:

These ‘traditionesque’ practices base their appeal in large part on association with tradition, but (perhaps because of their dubious credentials for traditional status according to local criteria) are not protected from change [11 p56].

Changgeuk and challenges for performers. We asked Moon SooHyun to explain the differences between the voice quality required in traditional pansori and those used in changgeuk:

There are many styles of changgeuk, because changgeuk had a big development since its origins. (…) Generally, I would say that changgeuk should be more simple, clearer, so that people can understand it more easily (Moon SooHyun’s personal interview, 2018).

Although changgeuk has its own individuality, it is a very popular form of art that is continuously changing, and it represents a major aspect of the job for many performers, who do not have a specific training in singing changgeuk, since the singing style used in changgeuk is still pansori.

But in his book, In search of Korean Traditional Opera [28], Killick highlights the technical problems that pansori singers encounter when they move to changgeuk:

  1. The typical husky voice quality used in pansori “does not project well through a texture of other pitched sounds, particularly in large venues” [28 p197]. Microphones are largely used in changgeuk, but the orchestra is amplified as well, and the use of microphones present aesthetic problems that, according to some, affect the artistry of changgeuk.

  2. To combine different pitched voices is hard using a pansori voice quality, and there might be challenges in intonation and coordination. Voices in changgeuk are not divided in sopranos, altos, tenors, etc., like in western music, and choirs sing in unison. This problem is yet more prominent when male and female voices are combined.6

  3. Pitched Korean traditional instruments can play comfortably only in a few keys, reducing the possibilities of adjustment necessary to facilitate vocal comfort, which is guaranteed in pansori performances where the singers are accompanied only by a drum and can choose their most comfortable pitch, even adjusting it during a song.

We asked the interviewees who sing in changgeuk (28 responders out of 41) whether they find the control of their voice easier or harder than in pansori. In Table 3 you can see their answers.

Table 3 Difficulties in voice control for changgeuk singers 

(Only for those who sing Changgeuk) Considering than Changgeuk, unlike Pansori, is performed with an orchestra and choirs and then the performer needs to sing on tune without choosing his most comfortable pitch, when you sing Changgeuk, how do you judge your ability to manage and master your voice (your technique)?
Very good 20,70%
Pretty good 51,70%
Pretty bad 27,60%
TOTAL 100,00%

Importance of changgeuk in pedagogy of pansori

In conclusion, due to its popularity and ability to develop and renew itself, changgeuk makes significant contributions to the definition of the pansori sound among the new generations of audiences. It also represents an important aspect of the job of several pansori performers. The traditional pansori training may not sufficiently address the performance demands expected of singers in changeeuk and those it may make in the future as the art form continues to change and evolve, moving it further away from the traditional requirements of pansori.

Pansori internationally

Changgeuk and new pansori are not the only two examples of western influences in pansori.

Hae-Kyung Um reports that transnational forms of pansori or pansori-derived genres have been appearing [26]. He mentions the forms developed in China and the former USSR due to the Korean diaspora, but also a form of pansori created in English for non-Korean speaking American audiences by Park Chan E., and a pansori version in Japanese.

As Moon SooHyun’s workshops and courses for non-Koreans prove, there is an increasing interest from Westerners in pansori.

While there are many westerners that are interested in pansori, we must report that pansori or changgeuk performers do not perform exclusively in these two genres. Figure 4 shows that the majority of our interviewees perform in other musical styles, and in almost two thirds of cases they specifically indicated that they perform genres that are derived from the West, such as opera, Contemporary Commercial Music (CCM) and Western Musical Theatre.

Figure 4 Commitment in other musical genres. 

As many pansori performers are no longer exclusively performing in traditional Korean music, the demanding training in pansori, that aims to allow the singer to attain the unique hoarse voice required in pansori, might actually represent a problem when they perform other styles that require a cleaner tone and a different management of voice.

Perception of vocal health of contemporary pansori singers and impact of voice disorders in their life

This unavoidable evolution of pansori (either in its aesthetics or in its working circumstances) is likely to be one of the reasons why vocal health is considered increasingly important among contemporary pansori singers (see Table 2).

In fact, almost all of our interviewees have experienced some kind of concern for their vocal health in their life, as Figure 5 shows.

Figure 5 Concerns about vocal health 

Therefore, unlike Korean newspapers and different commenters traditionally report, vocal health does not seem to be an irrelevant issue among pansori singers.

In order to understand whether these concerns were motivated by some actual vocal discomfort, we used part of VHI (Voice Handicap Index)7 in our survey [17,20] Our purpose was not a medical diagnosis, but a way to monitor the perception that the singers have of their own vocal health. We also asked our interviewees whether their symptoms tended to worsen after performing and if they experienced fatigue at the end of performances or in intense periods of work. In order to avoid any kind of bias and derogatory meaning of the word “symptoms”, we decided to use the word “phenomenon”. Tables 4, 5 and 6 show the answers of our interviewees:

Table 4 Perception of vocal health by pansori singers according with VHI 

Do you ever experience this phenomenon in your life? Always Almost always Almost never Never
I feel breathless when talking 0.0% 2.4% 61.0% 36.6%
My voice seems hissy or dry 0.0% 9.8% 61.0% 29.3%
My voice sounds hoarse 9.8% 22.0% 58.5% 9.8%
I make a lot of effort to speak 2.4% 14.6% 58.5% 24.4%
The clarity of my voice is unpredictable 0.0% 19.5% 53.7% 26.8%
I try to change my voice in order to sound different 7.3% 34.1% 51.2% 7.3%
I struggle to produce voice 0.0% 17.1% 48.8% 34.1%
My voice is worse at the end of the day 2.4% 12.2% 43.9% 41.5%
My voice fails in the middle of a conversation 0.0% 17.1% 24.4% 58.5%
MEAN 2.4% 16.5% 51.2% 29.8%

Table 5 Impact of intense work on vocal discomfort 

In periods of more intense performances and work, AFTER SOME PERFORMANCES, do you notice that these phenomena increase?
Not at all 19.5%
Yes, a bit 70.7%
Yes, very much 9.8%
TOTAL 100%

Table 6 Impact of the performance on vocal tiredness 

When you perform, AT THE END OF THE PERFORMANCE, your voice is:
Like at the beginning of the performance 31.7%
A bit tired 48.8%
Very tired 19.5%
TOTAL 100%

But what is the actual impact of these phenomena on their work? Some of our interviewees experienced troubles in their work due to vocal issues. Table 7 show the overall impact of voice disorders on work of the singers.

Table 7 Impact of voice disorders on work 

Has it ever happened that you had to interrupt a tour or a season or reject jobs because of lack of voice (except the normal cases of a flu or a cold)?
Never 85.4%
Sometimes 14.6%
Often 0.0%
TOTAL 100%

More precise statistical measurements are required, but it would be interesting to compare these data with performers in other musical genres. Having no comparative data, we want to suspend judgment and instead report our observations.

Conclusions

Further studies and more detailed research on larger groups are required, but a new approach to singing pansori is arising, as many pansori singers nowadays do not perform solely pansori. This is contributing to spread a bigger attention to vocal health among pansori singers, and despite the attempts to protect pansori from its evolution and changes, preferences of pansori listeners and audiences have been changing. These facts cannot be ignored and offer new thoughts on pansori pedagogy. Unlike previously thought, perhaps a more scientific and health-conscious approach to pansori voice training will be something from which many pansori singers can benefit, as many of them perform in western-derived musical styles, but would be prevented from doing so by having an unhealthy voice. Changgeuk is also an important part of their job, and it also contributes to the definition of the voice quality due to its popularity, although it has technical requirements that the traditional training in pansori does not address. All these facts are contributing to an increase in the awareness of pansori singers regarding vocal health.

By analyzing the unavoidable and intrinsic evolution of a traditional dramatic art that tends to be protected from change by many conservative traditionalists and describing the impact that this evolution has had on the requirements for a more effective training, appropriate for contemporary performers, our work can be situated in a more general context that reflects the need for continuous changes in voice pedagogy in response to the evolution of musical genres.

Acknowledgments

A special acknowledgement is for Park Jung Hyuk who introduced all of us to pansori and who shared with us precious observations about its evolution, helping us to form our initial hypothesis. Furthermore, we want to thank Moon SooHyun for her precious cooperation and Leon Trayman for his linguistic supervision. Without them, this article would never exist.

References

1. Pihl MR. What is Pansori? Chicago Review. 1993;39. [ Links ]

2. Park CE. Pansori, the Ancient Korean Art of Storytelling. In: McDonlad M, editor. Traditional Storytelling Today. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers; 2000. p. 122-128. Available from: https://ceas.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/events/past/20070416korealecture_pansori.pdfLinks ]

3. Jang Y. Pansori Performance Style: Audience Responses and Singers’ Perspectives. British Journal of Ethnomusicology. 2001;10(2):99-121. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3060664Links ]

4. Moon S-J. Acoustic Characteristics of Korean Traditional Singing Voice: a Preliminary Report. The Korean Society Of Phonetic Sciences And Speech Technology. 1996;24:367-371. Available from: https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/CFKO199613842053847.pdfLinks ]

5. Hong KH, Yang YS, Kim HK. Acoustic and Laryngeal characteristics of Korean Traditional Singers. Korean J Otolaryngol. 1996;39(10):1622-1632. Available from: http://jkorl.jatsxml.org/upload/pdf/0011996214.pdfLinks ]

6. Hongm Ki Hwan, Kim HG, Kim Sun Sook. The Professional Singers’ Voice Evaluation between Western Singing and Pansori Based on Vocal Fold Profiles and Acoustic Representations. Commun Sci Disord. 2006;11(3):153-64. Available from: https://www.e-csd.org/upload/11(3)_10.pdfLinks ]

7. Hong KH. The Vocalization for Korean Traditional Song ‘Pansori.’ Journal of The Korean Society of Laryngology, Phoniatrics and Logopedic. 2011;22(2):111-4. Available from: https://jkslp.org/upload/pdf/jkslp-22-2-111.pdfLinks ]

8. Marshall M. The key informant technique. Family Practice 1996. 1996;13(1):92-97. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.1.92Links ]

9. Kim SSHC. Korean Han and the Postcolonial Afterlives of ‘The Beauty of Sorrow. Korean Studies. 2017;41:253-279. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44508447Links ]

10. Willoughby H. The Sound of Han: Pansori, Tinbre and a Korean Ethos of Pain and Suffering. Yearbook for Traditional Music. 2000;32:17-30. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3185241Links ]

11. Killick A. Changgeuk Opera and the Category of the ‘traditionesque.’ Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press; 2010. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23719471Links ]

12. Moon S-J. General Acoustical Characteristics of Pansori Singing Voice. Korean Society of Speech Science. 2001;42:15-24. Available from: https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO200113842068743.pdfLinks ]

13. Teixeira JP, Oliveira C, Lopes C. Vocal Acoustic Analysis - Jitter, Shimmer and HNR Parameters. Procedia Technology. 2013;9:1112-1122. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.124Links ]

14. Mecorio F, Santangelo F, Gucciardo AG. The Korean “han” in Voice Performance: Preliminary Findings of a Pilot Study. ePhonoscope. 2020;3:5-9. Available from: https://ephonoscope.org/vol-3-2020/Links ]

15. Hirano M, McCormick KR. Clinical Examination of Voice by Minoru Hirano. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1986 Oct;80(4):1273. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.393788Links ]

16. Iwarsson J, Bingen-Jakobsen A, Johansen DS, Kølle IE, Pedersen SG, Thorsen SL, et al. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia: A Comparison Between Narrow and Broad Terminology Systems. Journal of Voice. 2018 Jul;32(4):428-436. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.07.006Links ]

17. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson G, Benninger MS, et al. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): Development and Validation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 1997;6(3):66-70. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66Links ]

18. Calvache-Mora CA. Parámetros vocales para definir la severidad de una disfonía. Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud. 2020 Dec 28;2(2):14-30. Doi: https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.39Links ]

19. Cantor-Cutiva LC, Malebrán Bezerra de Mello MC, Hunter EJ. Translation and adaptation of the Vocal Fatigue Index into Spanish. Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud. 2020 Dec 28;2(2):4-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.29Links ]

20. Yun Young Sun, Kim HyangHee, Son Young-Ik, Choi H. Validation of the Korean Voice Handicap Index (K-VHI) and the Clinical Usefulness of Korean VHI-10. Korean Journal of Communication Disorders. 2008;13:216-41. Available from: https://www.e-csd.org/upload/10041581.pdfLinks ]

21. Chae SJ. Hyangyucheung eui pueongdonggwa kwallyeon haeseobon pansori eui hyeonjae wa mirae (Present and Future of Pansori and its Changing Audiences). Pansori Yeongu (Journal of Pansori Studies). 2000;11:115-32. [ Links ]

22. McAllister-Viel T. Peer-reviewed Article A Cross-Cultural Examination of Breath and Sound Production in Pansori. Voice and Speech Review. 2001 Jan;2(1):297-311. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23268263.2001.10761483Links ]

23. Pihl MR. Pansori: the Korean Oral Narrative. Korean Studies. 1981 Jan;5:43-62. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23718812Links ]

24. Lee K-S. An Essay on Korean Modes. Asian Music. 1978;9(2):41-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/833755Links ]

25. Titze IR. Breath is not the carrier of speech. Voice and Speech Review. 2015 Jan 2;9(1):91-93. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23268263.2015.1091172Links ]

26. Um Hae-Kyung. New ‘pansori’ in Twenty-first Century Korea: Creative Dialectics of Tradition and Modernity. Asian Theatre Journal. 2008;25(1):24-57. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27568434Links ]

27. Killick AP. Jockeying for Tradition: the Checkered History of Korean Changgeuk Opera. Asia Theatre Journal. 2003;20(1):43-70. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1124052Links ]

28. Killick Andrew. In Search of Korean Traditional Opera - Discourses of Ch’angguk. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press; 2010 [ Links ]

1The system of romanization of Korean used in this article is the ‘RR’ (Revised Romanization), officially used in South Korea since 2000. The spelling ‘P’ansori’ refers to McCune-Reischauer romanization, still very common in many foreign articles about Korean music.

2Sandra So Hee Chi Kim, in her article “Korean Han and the postcolonial afterlives of ‘The beauty of sorrow’” (2017, see references), defines han as “unresolved resentment”.

3The spectral slope is a way to observe a sound signal’s distribution of energy in different harmonics. The energy in a voice signal tends to decrease in high harmonics. Moon’s observations say that high harmonics in pansori are still pretty strong.

4Jitter and shimmer are parameters connected with hoarseness in voice (e.g., Teixeira, Oliveira, Lopes, 2013).

5Kim, EunJeong, “Jeonbokilbo Sogye” Jeonbok Daily Newspaper, 2014. https://n9.cl/jierk (Accessed June 2018); https://n9.cl/uayha (Accessed June 2018); https://n9.cl/123t2 (Accessed June 2018).

6For some singers this might be too effortful.

7VHI is a questionnaire used to evaluate the vocal health of patients and the overall impact on their life (Jacobson, 1997). The version that we used was our own revised version, in which the questions were compared with the Italian version made by Luppi and the Korean version: https://www.e-csd.org/upload/13(2)_4.pdf

8Literature suggests many more types of ‘tones’, but these are the basic ones.

How to cite: Mecorio, Francesco; Santangelo, Francesco; Jang, Sowon; Kweon, Tae Hee; Gucciardo, Alfonso Gianluca. (2021). Pansori today: aesthetic demands vs vocal health. Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud. 3(2), pp-pp. https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.57

Invited editor: Carlos Manzano Aquiahuatl, MD, MSc., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7209-7700

Editor en jefe: Jorge Mauricio Cuartas Arias, Ph.D., https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9007-713X

Coeditor: Fraidy-Alonso Alzate-Pamplona, MSc., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6342-3444

Copyright: © 2021. Fundación Universitaria María Cano. The Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud provides open access to all its content under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Conflicts of Interest:The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Data Availability Statement: All relevant data is in the article and in the appendices. For more detailed information, write to the Corresponding Author.

Funding: None. This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Disclaimer: The content of this article is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not represent an official opinion of their institutions or the Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud.

Author Contributions:

Francesco Mecorio: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, visualization, writing - original draft and writing - review and editing.

Francesco Santangelo: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, visualization and writing - original draft.

Sowon Jang: conceptualization, investigation, resources, and software.

Tae Hee Kweon: conceptualization, investigation, resources, and software.

Alfonso Gianluca Gucciardo: methodology, supervision, and validation.

Appendix A - Questions and answers of the anonymous survey

Table 1 Interviewees: years of training in pansori 

How long have you been studying Pansori or Changgeuk?
Less than 5 years 17,1%
From 5 to 10 years 7,3%
10 to 20 years 51,2%
More than 20 years 24,4%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 2 Interviewees: qualification 

Do you have a degree?
Yes 73,2%
No 26,8%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 3 Interviewees: monthly average of performances 

How many shows do you perform ON AVERAGE in a MONTH?
One or less 14,6%
Two 12,2%
Three 14,6%
Four 19,5%
From five to ten 24,4%
More than ten 14,6%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 4 Interviewees: maximum amount of performances in a month 

How many shows do you perform AT MOST in a MONTH?
Five or less 14,6%
From six to ten 29,3%
From eleven to twenty 26,8%
More than twenty 29,3%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 5 Commitment in changgeuk 

Do you perform only in pansori or also in changgeuk?
Only Pansori 29,3%
Only Changgeuk 9,8%
Pansori and Changgeuk 61,0%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 6 Difficulties in voice control for changgeuk singers 

(Only for those who sing Changgeuk) Considering than Changgeuk, unlike Pansori, is performed with an orchestra and choirs and then the performer needs to sing on tune without choosing his most comfortable pitch, when you sing Changgeuk, how do you judge your ability to manage and master your voice (your technique)?
Very good 20,7%
Pretty good 51,7%
Pretty bad 27,6%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 7 Performance in other musical genres 

In addition to Pansori/Changgeuk, do you perform or train also in other musical genres? If yes, which ones?
No 12,2%
Yes 87,8%
Pop (CCM - Contemporary Commercial Music) 22,0%
Opera 7,3%
Western Musical Theater (no Changgeuk) 31,7%
Others 26,8%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 8 Concerns about vocal health 

Have you ever been worried about your vocal health?
Often 34,1%
Sometimes 43,9%
Very rarely 19,5%
Never 2,4%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 9 Importance of monitoring vocal health in pansori/changgeuk 

How much do you think it is important to monitor the vocal health and to keep the voice healthy for those who had an excellent artistic training in Pansori/Changgeuk?
Very important 92,7%
Quite important 7,3%
Not very important 0,0%
Irrelevant 0,0%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 10 Artistic standards in training in pansori 

Has most of your training been oriented in the achievement of very high artistic standards?
Yes 87,8%
No 12,2%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 11 Importance given to voice technique and control during the training in pansori 

(For those with most of training oriented to achievement of very high artistic standards) Do you think that this big commitment in the artistic aspects of the performance, could have left you less time that you wanted to spend to perfect and improve your voice technique and your voice control?
Yes, I didn’t have much time to focus on that, and anyways less than I wanted 66,7%
No, I could study voice techniques and voice control as much as I wanted, and I think that what I learned is enough for my musical genre 33,3%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 12 Importance of voice technique for pansori singers 

In your opinion, how important are a good voice technique and a good voice control for a Pansori/Changgeuk singer?
Very much 80,5%
Pretty much 19,5%
Not very much 0,0%
Not important at all 0,0%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 13 Impact of the performance on vocal tiredness 

When you perform, AT THE END OF THE PERFORMANCE (final part while you’re performing, this is what we mean), your voice is:
Like at the beginning of the performance 31,7%
A bit tired 48,8%
Very tired 19,5%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 14 Perception of vocal health by pansori singers according with VHI 

Do you ever experience this phenomen1 in your life? Always Almost always Almost never Never
I feel breathless when talking 0.0% 2.4% 61.0% 36.6% 100%
My voice seems hissy or dry 0.0% 9.8% 61.0% 29.3% 100%
My voice sounds hoarse 9.8% 22.0% 58.5% 9.8% 100%
I make a lot of effort to speak 2.4% 14.6% 58.5% 24.4% 100%
The clarity of my voice is unpredictable 0.0% 19.5% 53.7% 26.8% 100%
I try to change my voice in order to sound different 7.3% 34.1% 51.2% 7.3% 100%
I struggle to produce voice 0.0% 17.1% 48.8% 34.1% 100%
My voice is worse at the end of the day 2.4% 12.2% 43.9% 41.5% 100%
My voice fails in the middle of a conversation 0.0% 17.1% 24.4% 58.5% 100%
MEAN 2.4% 16.5% 51.2% 29.8%

1 We used the word “phenomena” instead of “symptoms” in order to avoid any possible orientations of the singers towards some specific answers, highlighting a possible derogatory meaning of the word.

Table 15 Impact of intense work on vocal discomfort 

In periods of more intense performances and work, AFTER SOME PERFORMANCES, do you notice that these phenomena increase?
Not at all 19,5%
Yes, a bit 70,7%
Yes, very much 9,8%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 16 Impact of voice disorders on work 

Has it ever happened that you had to interrupt a tour or a season or reject jobs because of lack of voice (except the normal cases of a flu or a cold)?
Never 85,4%
Sometimes 14,6%
Often 0,0%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 17 Importance of hoarseness in pansori/changgeuk 

How much is it important to have a hoarse voice to sing Pansori/Changgeuk?
Quite important 26,8%
Not very important 61,0%
Not important at all 12,2%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 18 Use of hoarseness in performance 

(For those who assign any importance in having a hoarse voice) Do you ever sing with hoarse voice ON PURPOSE?
Yes 63,9%
No 36,1%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 19 Hoarseness in training 

Was part of your training focused on making your voice become (more) hoarse?
Yes 29,3%
No 70,7%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 20 Ideal levels of hoarseness in pansori 

Consider a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is “not hoarse at all” (“clear tone”) and 10 is a sound that you struggle to hear and it struggles to be on tune because it is too hoarse MIN hoars. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MAX hoars. 10
What is the perfect number for Pansori/Changgeuk? 2% 2% 20% 12% 29% 10% 12% 7% 2% 2%
What is the LOWEST number? (below this number the sound might be too clear to sing Pansori/Changgeuk)? 20% 22% 20% 5% 22% 10% 2% 0% 0% 0%
What is the HIGHEST? (above this number the voice is too hoarse to sing Pansori/Changgeuk)? 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% 20% 22% 12% 10% 17%

Table 21 Gender of interviewees 

Male 22,0%
Female 78,0%
TOTAL 100,0%

Table 22 Age of the interviewees 

20 ≤ AGE < 30 39,0%
30 ≤ AGE < 40 48,8%
40 < AGE 12,2%
TOTAL 100,0%

Appendix B, Summary of Moon SooHyun’s personal interview (May 2018)

Q1 - Did pansori change since its origins? How?

A1 - Although there are still conservative performers, pansori is constantly changing. This is true of many genres, as the preferred singing styles changes according to the preferences of the audience.

Q2 - What is Han? It is said that you can translate “han” in English as “sorrow”. Do you agree?

A2 - Han is not only sorrow. It is repressed sorrow. Koreans are very emotional, but the environment and the culture don’t allow them to express emotions very freely. I think that old generations have their own han, that they experienced a different han than new generations. They experienced wars, tortures, division of the country in North and South Korea, etc. This repressed sorrow makes Koreans more passionate. You can’t teach Han. Getting older, the bad events of life teach you han. That’s why master singers are old: they collected many experiences and they can express more han.

Q3 - How would you express “han” in your voice?

A3 - This is actually the most difficult question. I’m sure that every singer has a different idea about han. I can share with you my personal thoughts though. We use the word seongeum to define the tone color of pansori. This is the most important thing that a pansori singer must achieve: the particular tone color. That seongeum will come to singers who have a drastic training for a long time or got special talent. And that color expresses han. This means that han is not a technique, but the color that the singers have, that is influenced by their life. So, if the singers have suffered or they have much repressed sorrow in their life, their voice color would be great. That’s why older generation are much more talented than younger generations, even though I think it’s not only a matter of quantity of han, but also of kind of han. New generations have a different han, they experience different kinds of sorrow.

Q4 - Can you teach “han”?

A4 - Getting older, the bad events of life teach you Han, that’s why Master Singers are old; they have a lot of experiences.

Q5 - Is hoarseness important in the pansori sound?

A5 - Not really. It is not compulsory. I would never say that a pansori singer is bad just because he or she have a clear tone. Hoarseness comes naturally with age. Nowadays, if the voice doesn’t get hoarse with age, the singer is even considered a better singer.

Q6 - Which kind of technical training did you receive as pansori student in order to achieve the quality? And how did you learn how to teach pansori?

A6 - When I started my training in pansori, nobody taught me how to produce the sound. Nobody. My first teacher just told me “follow me”, I had to study by myself, just guessing what could be dangerous for my voice. However, I like things well organized, so when I started to teach I had to create my own way to transmit pansori, learning by myself and finding a new way to change the words and pass the information.

Q7 - Do people start to train pansori in University?

A7 - No, much earlier, usually when they’re in they’re aged 15 or 16. Then they enroll in Universities.

Q8 - Does the training still occur outdoor, among mountains and waterfalls?

A8 - Long time ago the training occurred in the mountains, surrounded by waterfalls, for up to 100 days. Nowadays we still follow this tradition but for a much shorter time, one week at the shortest, one month at the longest.

Q9 - How did western culture affect changgeuk?

A9 - Western culture affected changgeuk very much; we didn’t have theater before. Western culture affected changgeuk especially in the acoustic system.

Q10 - Can you please explain the differences between the voice quality required in pansori and those used in changgeuk?

A10 - There are many styles of changgeuk, because changgeuk had a big development since its origins. There is even a Museum for Traditional Performing Arts where you can see the recordings of old changgeuk and check their differences with contemporary shows. Generally, I would say that changgeuk should be more simple, clearer, so that people can understand it more easily.

Q11 - Do you think that vocal health is important in pansori?

A11 - Yes. But why do vocal folds get unhealthy? Because of wrong vocalization. In my opinion, different people have different vocal folds and different capacity of resistance to efforts. When they are young, they usually have no problems, unless they’re naturally unhealthy, but after years of severe training, becoming older, problems occur. Many students over 20 get some troubles in their voices. My vocal folds are really healthy; I lost my voice very few times. And yet, when I was in my thirties my voice was starting to get tired and I realized how important my vocal health was. Fortunately, I met my present teacher who is a master teacher and he’s very focused on vocal health; when he listened to my voice he told me that he was afraid that I could become completely voiceless sooner or later. So we started a new training from the beginning.

Appendix C - Main findings of previous studies

Table 1 Evolution of pansori and how it affected the form of performance 

Year Author Title Main Findings
2001 Jang Pansori performance style: audience responses and singers’ perspective - Changes in the venue where pansori is performed have changed the style of pansori
- There have been experiments of contamination of pansori from other musical genres
2001 Killick Changgeuk Opera and the Category of the “Traditionesque - Changgeuk is a form of “traditionesque”, in continuous evolution
- Changgeuk has never been designated as Intangible Cultural Property or protected from changes as pansori is
2003 Killick Jockeying for tradition: the checkered history of Korean Changgeuk Opera - Theater is a relatively new form of art in Korea, later than pansori
- Korean Theater and Changgeuk are largely influenced by Western theater
- There are differences in the performance between pansori and changgeuk
2006 Pihl P’ansori: The Korean Oral Narrative - Changes in pansori due to the opening of the first National Theater and Japanese annexation
2008 Um New Pansori in Twenty-first-century Korea: Creative dialectics of tradition and modernity - Pansori was designated as Intangible Cultural Asset by the Korean Government and as Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity by UNESCO
- New forms of pansori have been appearing recently, stimulating discussions about the form of pansori
- “Ttorang Kwangdae” is a word usually considered derogative, but some performers use it to proudly define themselves. There is a movement that claims that the intrinsic evolution of pansori makes it alive and gives it back its original true spirit

Table 2 Qualitative, acoustic and physiological analysis of voice quality used in pansori, and other relevant medical considerations. 

Year Author Title Main Findings
1996 Moon Acoustic characteristics of Korean traditional singing voice: A preliminary report - The voice quality of pansori singers presents a flatter spectral slope than western singers and hoarseness
- rowspan="3"This is the result of a permanent change of the voice source (larynx), due to the specific training of pansori
1996 Hong, Yang, Kim Acoustic and laryngeal characteristics of Korean Traditional Singers - Several pansori singers have voice injuries and laryngeal lesions; sometimes problems are so big that voice is not audible
- GRBAS scale is a tool that can be used in the diagnosis, in addition to other methods, and it considers hoarseness as a parameter of evaluation
- There are high level of Jitter and Shimmer in Pansori voices
1997 Jacobson et al. The Voice handicap Index (VHI): Development and Validation - VHI, Voice Handicap Index, can be used as a tool to evaluate the impact of voice disorders in the overall life
2000 Willoughby The Sound of Han: Pansori, Timbre and Korean Ethos of Pain and Suffering - Han is hard to define
- The sound of han in pansori is a particular harsh voice quality
- Many musical and voice factors combine to create the sound of han
- Han in singing can be expressed by “breaks” resembling crying
- Harshness is often used to communicate sorrow
2001 Killick Changgeuk Opera and the Category of the “Traditionesque - Pansori has a distinctive husky vocal tone
2001 Moon General Acoustical Characteristics of Pansori Singing voice - Most pansori singers’ voice sound hoarse
- Aperiodicity is a characteristic of pansori singers’ voice and it’s present in spoken voice as well as in sung voice
- The spectral slope of pansori voice is pretty flat
- Pansori has a very unique vibrato
- Voice in pansori can be characterized as pressed, yet breathy, which suggests a permanent change in the source due to rigorous training
2006 Hong, KIm, Kim The professional Singers’ evaluation between Western Singing and Pansori Based on Vocal Fold Profiles and Acoustic Representations - The vocal folds of pansori singers are asymmetrical
- The vibrato used in pansori is different from the vibrato used in western singers.
- Pansori singers tend to have nodules
2011 Hong The Vocalization for Korean Traditional song Pansori - Pansori singers tend to have nodules and mucosal damage due to excessive contact of true vocal folds
2013 Teixeira et al. Vocal Acoustic Analysis - Jitter, Shimmer and HNR Parameters - Jitter and Shimmer are parameters connected with hoarseness in voice
2017 Kim Korean Han and the Postcolonial Afterlives of “the beauty of sorrow” - Han (the collective feeling of unresolved resentment and grief that belongs to Koreans) is also considered part of complex beauty and it’s present in many forms of Korean arts

Table 3 Pedagogy of pansori 

Year Author Title Main Findings
1996 Hong, Yang, Kim Acoustic and laryngeal characteristics of Korean Traditional Singers - Pansori singing method has been introduced orally without including scientific methods
2000 Park Pansori, the ancient korean art of storytelling - To obtain the distinctive voice quality of pansori is essential for a pansori singer
- This distinctive voice quality is achieved after a long and demanding training
- Modern technologies have created some changes in teaching pansori, but very little
2000 Willoughby - The Sound of Han: Pansori, Timbre and Korean Ethos of Pain and Suffering The training of pansori singers to acquire the typical voice quality needed is intensive and much attention is given to breathing “from the stomach” and exert pressure “on the diaphragm”
2000 Jae Present and Future of Pansori and its Changing Audiences
- University courses in pansori have been opened in 1980 in Korea
- University can only partially provide the students with the appropriate training that they need
2001 Jang Pansori performance style: audience responses and singers’ perspective - Vocal technique in pansori is often synonymous of “vocal embellishments”
2001 Mc Allister-Viel Peer-reviewed article a cross-cultural examination of breath and sound production in Pansori - Pansori training is based on mimetic techniques and very little time is given to the discussion of vocal training techniques
-The training in pansori is very demanding and has the aim of creating voice injuries
2006 Pihl P’ansori: The Korean Oral Narrative - Pansori is transmitted through a strong master-disciple relationship
-The training in pansori required efforts and was very demanding in order to acquire the voice quality typical of pansori
2010 Killick In Search of Korean Traditional Opera - Pansori singers who perform in changgeuk encounter difficulties that they have not been trained for
2011 Hong The Vocalization for Korean Traditional song Pansori - the training in pansori is based on non-scientific methods
-In pansori training big attention is given to breathing as the responsible for loud phonation

Appendix D - A workshop of pansori for foreigners

In Bukchon, a traditional village in Seoul, located among royal palaces and temples, where cultural centers, guesthouses, restaurants, and tea houses offer non-Korean the opportunity to experience a taste of authentic Korean culture, Moon SooHyun (a professional pansori performer in her late thirties, awarded with national prizes and university lecturer) gives workshops in pansori for non-Korean, called “A taste of Korean folksongs”.

On May 26, 2018, we observed one of these workshops in order to see how pansori is taught and how non-Koreans respond to this training. Twenty people from Europe, United States and Asia attended. Moon SooHyun teaches in two languages (English and Korean) and her teaching approach includes sections of explanation and demonstration before practicing, but often it is based on the paradigm of “practice, revise, repeat”.

In the workshop that we attended she started with an introduction to the history of pansori and how it developed in different areas of Korea and as a response to different social and cultural needs; then she proceeded with the practical aspects of the training; after working on rhythms of pansori (using practical activities and without explaining concepts like meter or tempo), she introduced three basic ‘tones’ of pansori, that are:

  1. Central tone (fundamentally a straight tone).

  2. Vibrating tone (a vibrato).

  3. Bending tone (a tone preceded by an appoggiatura).8

She alternated these 3 different tones on different pitches, in order to make the students practice them, and then she added lyrics, teaching two of the most popular traditional folksongs in Korea: “Ganggang Sullae” and “Arirang”. The format was often the same: call and response; she demonstrated first, and then she asked the students to repeat.

Received: March 22, 2021; Revised: August 22, 2021; Accepted: October 04, 2021

*Correspondence: Francesco Mecorio, email: francesco.mecorio@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License