Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Cited by Google
Similars in SciELO
Similars in Google
Share
Revista Científica General José María Córdova
Print version ISSN 1900-6586On-line version ISSN 2500-7645
Abstract
UNAL, Mustafa Coşar and ULUDAğ, Petra Cafnik. Insisting on victory: Victory versus success in limited and asymmetric wars. Rev. Cient. Gen. José María Córdova [online]. 2019, vol.17, n.28, pp.891-922. Epub May 11, 2020. ISSN 1900-6586. https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.522.
In a COIN campaign, using the term victory, a military defeat of the enemy -in its classical definition- is highly problematic. A review of the Turkey-PKK conflict reveals that after Turkey's pursuit of a unilateral military victory, the PKK pursued a broader socio-political campaign by relying on asymmetric warfare and indirectness in combat. Military victory did not successfully end the conflict; it only changed its nature. Therefore, we suggest that success is a better concept to assess states' counter-insurgency campaigns. It focuses on political solutions and shifts perception from one-sided victory to a favorable outcome for all parties involved. Lastly, referring to the completed phases as a success offers better accuracy because the outcome in COIN is not merely a victory or a defeat.
Keywords : asymmetric warfare; insurgency; intra-state conflict; military defeat; success; victory.