SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.48 issue129Cash transfers conditioned as latin american recipe of social inclusion and human rights: issues and challengesProportionality as an interpretative method of transitional justice author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas

Print version ISSN 0120-3886

Abstract

OBIOL ANAYA, Erik Francesc. Subjective or objective responsibility in the administrative penalty procedure in peruvian legislation. Rev. Fac. Derecho Cienc. Polit. - Univ. Pontif. Bolivar. [online]. 2018, vol.48, n.129, pp.491-506. ISSN 0120-3886.  https://doi.org/10.18566/rfdcp.v48n129.a08.

One of these powers granted by the legal system to the State as a subject of law is the ius puniendi, which is the right that empowers the state to punish or punish the administration that incurs a breach of the provisions of the legal system, using of his faculty of Imperium and managing to guarantee through his control an adequate social coexistence.

The purpose of this research is to establish a critique of the responsibility established in the Peruvian system, applying an analytical methodology.

The sanctioning administrative procedure starts from the conception that the State is an entity in which a considerable number of powers converge, that when exercised as indicated by the legal norm, will generate in all the administered an erga omnes effect.

Keywords : Administrative procedure; sanctioning regime; ius puniendi; administrative responsibility; legal power.

        · abstract in Spanish | French | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )