SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue60BLUMENBERG AND FOUCAULT: THE ANALYSIS OF THE PASTORAL POWER AS AN ESSAY OF POLITICAL METAPHOROLOGYAUTHORITY, IDEOLOGY AND VIOLENCE author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Universitas Philosophica

Print version ISSN 0120-5323

Abstract

BOTERO, Adolfo Jerónimo  and  LEAL GRANOBLES, Yuliana. RADICAL EVIL AND BANALITY OF EVIL: TWO FACES OF HORROR OF TOTALITARIAN REGIMES FROM HANNAH ARENDT'S PERSPECTIVE. Univ. philos. [online]. 2013, vol.30, n.60, pp.99-126. ISSN 0120-5323.

This article aims to analyze Arendtian notions of "radical evil" and "banality of evil" with their respective relations. Arendt described terror as the "essence" of totalitarian regime. This terror differs from the most familiar cases of revolutionary or tyrannical terror the former not being really a means at all, but a process without a goal. Its goal was to reveal the sheer superfluousness of human beings, to show that there are no limits inherent to power's ability to dehumanize individuals. Arendt introduced the notion of "radical evil" to describe atrocious crimes of totalitarian regimes. But she goes from the idea of radical evil to the controversial notion of banality of evil. This notion occurred to her during the coverage Adolf Eichmann's trial in Jerusalem for The New Yorker. Arendt describes with the notion of the banality of evil a bureaucratic agent that makes atrocious crimes without the presence of a wicked motive or ideological fervor.

Keywords : Arendt; radical evil; banality of evil; terror; thoughtlessnes.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )