Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Share
Discusiones Filosóficas
Print version ISSN 0124-6127
Abstract
MIRANDA-ROJAS, Rafael. “A posteriori necessity, trivialization and overgeneralization”. discus.filos [online]. 2019, vol.20, n.34, pp.43-63. ISSN 0124-6127. https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2019.20.34.3.
This paper discusses the plausibility of the admission of general non-natural rigid terms. Theoretical identity statements that include general non-natural rigid terms do not express a posteriori necessity: they are analytical, necessary and a priori statements. Only statements of identity that include general rigid natural terms are statements necessary a posteriori. The problems of trivialization and overgeneralization assume that the application of rigidity to the terms of non-natural kinds, detracts from rigidity as a semantic-modal differentiator, but that is only true if these problems require that any general rigid term allows affirming a posteriori necessity, which is rejected. The nominalization of a general term is proposed as a solution to trivialization and over-generalization. Similarly, a restrictive predicative reading of the general terms is discarded. Finally, the main cases of general non-rigid terms are explained: syntactically complex descriptive terms.
Keywords : Necessity; a posteriori; trivialization; overgeneralization; nominalization; non-natural rigid general term.