SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue1The Yeast of Evil and the Absurd Mass: The Crowds in the Work of Gabriel TardeLegal Implications in the Context of Big Data: The Case of the Navega Seguro App author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Novum Jus

Print version ISSN 1692-6013On-line version ISSN 2500-8692

Abstract

ORTIZ-VILLAREJO, Jorge Alberto. Prevalence of Emotions and Populism in the Colombian Congress: The Case of Life Imprisonment. Novum Jus [online]. 2023, vol.17, n.1, pp.331-356.  Epub June 24, 2023. ISSN 1692-6013.  https://doi.org/10.14718/novumjus.2023.17.1.14.

In response to the problem of physical and sexual violence against children in Colombia, the Congress of the Republic approved in 2020 the life imprisonment for those who committed these types of crimes, as its majorities considered it to be the correct solution to this social phenomenon. However, several sectors have doubted this measure, calling it populist and unnecessary. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that in this case the primacy of emotion-or intuition-and not of reason was evidenced. To this end, an analysis of the arguments presented in the different debates is made, based on theories of argumentation and cognitive psychology, describing punitive populism. The conclusion is that arguments based on intuition and emotion prevailed over science or reason. This is compatible with populism, which can be combated, I argue, through a different perspective that includes scientific culture, recognition of the other, and emotional education.

Keywords : argumentation; life imprisonment; democracy; emotions; punitive populism; cognitive psychology.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )