Inglés (pdf)
Articulo en XML
Referencias del artículo
Traducción automática
Enviar articulo por email
Citado por SciELO 
Citado por Google 
Similares en
SciELO 
Similares en Google 
Permalink
Introduction
Low and middle-income countries (LMIC) have been the focus of international efforts to overcome vulnerabilities; however, each region entails particular political practices that determine the development of their populations.
Early child development is a process of maturation involving skills during the first years of life1. Several factors affect the Early child development (ECD), including poverty, poor parental practices, lack of child stimulation, and poor nutrition, affecting human capital and productivity in adulthood2,3.
Governance is defined as the attempts of governments to steer groups of countries to pursue health as integral to well-being through the whole of government and society4.
The individual health development governance sub-functions indices can aid policymakers in locating the sources of inadequate governance and developing appropriate interventions for ameliorating health situations5.
In 2016, a study updated the number of low-development children, reporting approximately 43% of children under five in LMIC6. That meant a few changes from a previous study7.
In 2020, another study calculated a suspected delay prevalence for the Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) ranged from 3% in Barbados to 67% in Chad. Twenty-five percent of the children were suspected of delay8.
The ECDI was included in the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS). The ECDI consists of a 10-item instrument covering four areas of development. A study estimated that 33% of children from some LMIC were not reaching their full cognitive or social-emotional developmental potential9. Other studies have also used the ECDI, showing the importance of children's books10, parents' education, and interaction with the child11,12,13 to improve their chances of developing correctly.
Early Child development is part of the plan 203010. The increasing number of surveys with the ECDI in MICS surveys will monitor progress made in development areas - .
The literature is still lacking a visual picture of levels of child development. Thus, this study aimed to assess children's proportions in some LMIC with available data pre-pandemic (COVID-19) and government effectiveness measures.
Methods
This is an ecological study of 33 low - and middle-income countries with information available before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Data Sources
Geographic information systems
Using the ArcMap 10.6 software, the 33 countries in the global geographic spectrum were plotted. The geographic patterns of child development were analyzed, representing the percent progression of GE estimate and GE Rank.
We also used GeoDa.int Software implementing a spatial spectrum; the computation is based on standardized variables (ECDI and GE estimate) corresponding to correlations.
Early Child Development Index
We used data from MICS; these surveys present robust, comparable data for more than 100 critical health and wellness indicators for women and children. Since the fourth round of MICS surveys (starting in 2009), surveys began to include a module on ECD. The ECDI is based on a 10-item instrument responded by the mothers or caregivers of children aged 36-59 months15. The questions are separated into four areas: Physical, Social-emotional, Learning, and Literacy-numeracy.
A child is considered on track for each domain if she passes on two, one, two, and one item. The ECDI considers a child to be developmentally on track if three of the four domains are progressing adequately.
For this study, the most recent results of each country were extracted, reported from 2016 to 2019, a time before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Government Effectiveness
The Worldwide Governance Indicators refers to aggregate and individual governance indicators for more than 200 countries in the period from 1996-2019, for six faces of governance: Voice and Accountability, Political Stability, Absence of violence; also, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, Rule of Law and Control of Corruption16.
For the present study, we used the indicator of Government Effectiveness (GE) that interprets perceptions of public services, the quality of the service and the degree of its independence from political pressures, the quality of policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of the government16.
We use two measures of the indicator: the GE estimate (scale from -2 "weak" to +2 "optimal) and the GE rank (0 to 100%) of each country and the same year in ECDI.
Statistical analysis
Pearson17 and Spearman correlation tests were performed to estimate levels of correlation between ECDI and GE estimate and GE Rank.
The analyses were performed with Stata (StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15.1. College Station, TX, USA: StataCorp LLC). MICS are public sources of information, and ethical approval was already obtained by the institutions responsible in each country.
Results
We studied children from 33 countries, with survey years ranging from 2016 to 2019; countries that reported their most recent ECDI scores before 2016 were not considered.
Table 1 shows the prevalence of Early Child Development (ECDI) for the 33 countries studied, grouped by UNICEF world region, and presents the GE estimate and GE Rank scores. The continents with the most significant number of countries were Africa and Asia.
Table 1 Prevalence of Early Child Development (ECDI) for the 33 countries studied, grouped by UNICEF world region, Government effectiveness GE estimate, and GE Rank scores.
Countries from seven world regions were studied; Thailand (91.1%) and Turkmenistan (90.7%) have the highest percentages of child development and the lowest Burundi (39.6%). The lowest value on the GE estimate is in Burundi (-1.3) and the highest in the Democratic Republic of Korea (1). In the GE Rank, the highest values are in Korea with 82.1%, and the lowest in Haiti (0.9%).
Figure 1 shows the spatial conjunction between ECDI, GE estimate, and GE Rank. The general pattern is that the African regions present low indices of government effectiveness, which is positively correlated in this study. This reflects the world's neglect of an area that feeds many developed countries but lacks the means to promote effective interventions to benefit its children. Africa is a wealth mine for countries with high levels of development that do not seem to be interested in human development, the countries from which they derive so many benefits.
Correlation Analysis
The grade of correlation between ECDI and GE Estimate was calculated, this being a moderate positive correlation of (0.522, P-0.001, Correlation Spearman test), similarly to (0.518, P-0001, Pearson correlation test) (Figure 2), with the location of the studied countries in the spectrum.
Figure 3 shows the geographical correlation between the GE estimate and ECDI values; a well-defined positive correlation supports the previous correlation tests applied.
Discussion
It is crucial to analyze children's early development before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship with the degree of effective government in each country, as a point of reference for further studies. Our study presents, to date, a comprehensive assessment of ECD and government effectiveness at the global level using national surveys. We studied 33 LMIC spread from East Asia, through Europe and Africa to Latin America and the Caribbean. We found massive variation in ECDI from Thailand (91.1%) and Turkmenistan (90.7%) to Burundi (39.6%).
The results must be interpreted considering the country's context conditions. Despite the limitations listed, the results are precious for setting global and country agendas.
The early years of life and the preschool period are the most critical time in child development to build the child's future towards healthy development6.
According to other studies, the low development high scores were concentrated in areas of the world exposed to other risk factors ( malnutrition, micronutrient deficiency, malaria, HIV, which can lead to adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes) and low availability healthcare and educational resources such as Africa and Asia9,18.
Despite the efforts made, it is vital to improve these unfavorable conditions as an improvement in these could also improve the development of the children; gender inequality is the leading cause of poverty and holds back progress in improving child well-being18. It is essential not to avoid efforts to increase the social and political protection of children and promote the welfare of countries of LMIC the contrast between many of these with some high-income countries is enormous and must be a priority to put children at the center of sustainable and equitable progress19.
As a part of the limitations of this study, we can mention that the ECDI items used to quantify children's development were designed to be brief, to be administered within a household survey; but have some restrictions to better describe some specific subdomains of cognition and social-emotional competencies9. Nevertheless, the 10-item ECDI was validated by testing and iterative analyses of data collected in Jordan, the Philippines, and Kenya15.
On the other hand, one of the strengths is a previous hypothesis of the prior studies8 on early childhood development, which maximizes the possibility of detecting genuine relationships between the response variables and the explanatory variables17.
Some questions about the construction of the ECDI domains could have controversy because of their high degree of difficulty (literacy-numeracy domain) or their simplicity (physical domain). However, it is essential to mention that the ECDI must be interpreted as a general guide that aims to assess children's development for decision policymakers and programs. Still, the ECD is the result of multiple factors that interact. Added to the brief nature of the surveys, it is too much to ask for complete radiography of development. Nevertheless, we reiterate it is advantageous. The index is best interpreted within the context of other variables related to support for early childhood development in the home and community19.
To date, the ECDI is an optimal measure of child development available for LMIC, covering many countries to guide policies and strategies. However, given all the limitations already exposed.
It is worth noting that several internal political processes of many countries in recent decades have added adverse circumstances to family dynamics, such as the forced migrations that have increased that could influence families and have weight in the inadequate developmental children's goals. Only have access to pre-primary education; in low-income countries, just one in five children has access to preschool, and one in 200 children in the world is displaced, affecting their development. These displacements of families are from country to country and internally between regions, in alarming numbers of thousands to millions, as in the case of Colombia, Mexico, Central America, some African countries, and the Middle East.
The impact on child development due to the pandemic is uncertain. Some studies consider older age groups to study, but the evidence is still minimal for 3 to 5 years. We trust our findings can contribute to the spatial understanding of the child development relationship and the effectiveness of governments to promote actions that favor barriers to the correct development of children during and after the pandemic.
Conclusions
With the most up-to-date data reported by countries, it is possible to establish the level of child development before 2019, the year in which the COVID-19 pandemic began. Studies must be carried out during and after the pandemic to develop the direct and indirect damage that children receive in the dimensions of development, in which the government response is decisive.
