SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número21Evaluación de la resistencia de un prototipo de placa de compresión dinámica (PCD) fabricada de polimetilmetacrilato (PMMA) probada en fémur canino osteotomizadoEnfermedades del ganado en la región de La Macarena (Meta).: Un ejercicio de epidemiología participativa índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de Medicina Veterinaria

versión impresa ISSN 0122-9354versión On-line ISSN 2389-8526

Resumen

GIL, Sandra J.; RAMIREZ, Camilo L.  y  GALINDO, Vladimir. Comparison of the Degree of Sedation, Anaesthetic Depth and Collateral Effects of Five Anaesthetic Protocols in Healthy Dogs. Rev. Med. Vet. [online]. 2011, n.21, pp.25-39. ISSN 0122-9354.

The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of sedation, anesthetic depth and collateral effects of five anesthetic protocols routinely used in healthy canine patients at the National University of Colombia. Fifteen adult (1-5 years old), mixed-breed dogs (5 males, 10 females), weighting 15-20 kg, were anaesthetized using the following protocols: 1. Atropine + Xylazine followed by Thiopental; 2. Atropine + Xylazine followed by Ketamine + Diazepam; 3. Acepromazine, followed by Atropine + Hydromorphone and then Thiopental; 4. Atropine + Hydromorphone followed by Diazepam and then Thiopental and; 5. Atropine + Hydromorphone followed by Diazepam and then Propofol. The animals were healthy and each one was anaesthetized with the five anesthetic protocols, with an interval of at least one week. No surgical procedures were performed. Significant differences were found in the degree of sedation between protocols, specifically regarding the need for restriction (p=0.0043), anesthetic depth (p=0.0183) and analgesia at 0 and 5 minutes post induction (p=0.0045 and 0.0233, respectively). As far as collateral effects are concerned, there were significant differences in parameters such as temperature loss (p=0.0137) and partial oxygen saturation (p=0.0001). There were no significant differences between protocols regarding important parameters, such as the frequency of arrhythmias (p=0.7404), but they were more severe when using protocol 1. The longest anesthetic times were observed during protocol 3. It is concluded that protocol 5 is superior to the others, since it provided an adequate anesthetic depth, with less severe collateral effects.

Palabras clave : sedation; anesthesia; collateral effects; protocols.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons