SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número37Comisión interamericana y los estados que denuncian la convención americana y la carta de la OEACovid-19 y decisión judicial: competencia para decidir las medidas del Decreto 546 de 2020 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Justicia

versión impresa ISSN 0124-7441

Resumen

LOPEZ VARGAS, Samuel Leonardo. Guardianship against judicial decisions: res judicata, characteristics and exceptions. Justicia [online]. 2020, vol.25, n.37, pp.201-214. ISSN 0124-7441.  https://doi.org/10.17081/just.25.37.3939.

The present document develops an analysis from the hermeneutical approach that poses to the guardianship, as a relevant legal tool for the protection of fundamental rights, which can sometimes be violated by judicial operators at the time of issuing their sentences, that is why, that from the dialogic paradigm, it is possible to analyze the precedents of the constitutional court, where criteria have been unified that allow the provenance of this action against judicial sentences, as a tool that ensures the restoration of fundamental rights and not as an additional resource or higher instance of the process therefore, the guardianship becomes for Colombians a vital institution for the safeguarding of their constitutional legal faculties, thus being able, on occasion, to have the authority to go against the judged thing, thus allowing to return to study a process from the constitutional scope without need to review issues typical of the ordinary process.

Palabras clave : constitutional right; fundamental right; guardianship; judicial sentences; juged thing.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )