SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número38Responsabilidad penal de los profesionales de la salud en contexto de emergencia sanitariaDerecho a la resistencia y constitucionalismo: apuntes desde Gargarella índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Justicia

versión impresa ISSN 0124-7441

Resumen

HERRERA DIAZ, Juan Camilo  y  RESTREPO, Juliana Pérez. Jurisprudential subreggles in the provinces of the Colombian constitutional court about factual defects. Justicia [online]. 2020, vol.25, n.38, pp.127-142.  Epub 06-Oct-2020. ISSN 0124-7441.  https://doi.org/10.17081/just.25.38.4384.

The objective of this paper aims to describe the sub-rules of the due process of evidence generated in decisions of the Colombian Constitutional Court, which was carried out from a qualitative legal investigation, under the comprehensive method and hermeneutical methodological approach, supported by the documentary research modality and jurisprudential analysis. The right to present evidence and to dispute the ones that are brought against is a fundamental right, fundamental in a State of Law, which allows to develop to a great extent the right of access to the administration of justice, the right of defense and contradiction in a any scenario, specifically for what is discussed here, in legal proceedings, and even in administrative proceedings. This right, which is part of the relational right of due process, has presented various criteria to be protected against its multiple violations, issues that are approached by addressing the topic of guardianship against judicial rulings, emphasizing the error in the evidentiary; as well as the systematization of such sub-rules within the framework of the due process of evidence, for the obtaining, assessment and legality of judicial evidence. Which, finally, is complemented by the description of relevant specific cases resolved in light of the aforementioned jurisprudential sub-rules, through which the right to evidence is protected. Having clarity in front of this legal field has repercussions on the guarantees of infinite rights and strengthens the jurisdictional, constitutional and democratic system.

Palabras clave : guardianship action against judicial sentence; due process; factual defect; right to proof; jurisprudential sub-rules.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )