SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número28La atribución pública como reguladora de emociones: manipulación de los efectos políticos de las hostilidadesCómo terminan las insurgencias: en busca de la victoria del gobierno índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Científica General José María Córdova

versión impresa ISSN 1900-6586versión On-line ISSN 2500-7645

Resumen

UNAL, Mustafa Coşar  y  ULUDAğ, Petra Cafnik. Insisting on victory: Victory versus success in limited and asymmetric wars. Rev. Cient. Gen. José María Córdova [online]. 2019, vol.17, n.28, pp.891-922.  Epub 11-Mayo-2020. ISSN 1900-6586.  https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.522.

In a COIN campaign, using the term victory, a military defeat of the enemy -in its classical definition- is highly problematic. A review of the Turkey-PKK conflict reveals that after Turkey's pursuit of a unilateral military victory, the PKK pursued a broader socio-political campaign by relying on asymmetric warfare and indirectness in combat. Military victory did not successfully end the conflict; it only changed its nature. Therefore, we suggest that success is a better concept to assess states' counter-insurgency campaigns. It focuses on political solutions and shifts perception from one-sided victory to a favorable outcome for all parties involved. Lastly, referring to the completed phases as a success offers better accuracy because the outcome in COIN is not merely a victory or a defeat.

Palabras clave : asymmetric warfare; insurgency; intra-state conflict; military defeat; success; victory.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )