SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.83 número197Monitoreo y evaluación del uso de la energía en estaciones de tratamiento de crudoError humano y reacción a alarmas en seguridad de procesos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


DYNA

versión impresa ISSN 0012-7353

Resumen

CAICEDO-PINEDA, Gerardo Andrés  y  MARQUEZ-GODOY, Marco Antonio. Differences between the use of ferric sulphate and ferric chloride on biodesulfurization of a large coal particle. Dyna rev.fac.nac.minas [online]. 2016, vol.83, n.197, pp.74-80. ISSN 0012-7353.  https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v83n197.50318.

Three iron sources (FeSO4, Fe2(SO4)3 and FeCl3) at different concentrations (150, 700 and 1250 mg Fe/L) were evaluated on large coal particle biodesulfurization processes at Erlenmeyer level. A consortium of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (ATCC 23270) and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (ATCC 15494) was used in all the assays. By using 150 mg Fe2+/L (from FeSO4), pyrite biooxidation was 31.14% after 12 days. When Fe2(SO4)3 replaced FeSO4, oxidation improved by 21.16%. The assays using the highest concentrations of sulphate sources also obtained the same increase. However, Fe2(SO4)3 assays had a better sulphate removal from coal. This suggests that using the smallest concentration of Fe2(SO4)3 is a good alternative to boost the pyrite oxidation rate and avoid the formation of precipitates. Additionally, biooxidation in the FeCl3 assays decreased, indicating, a priori, that the microorganisms were not able to adapt properly to Cl- ions.

Palabras clave : coal biodesulfurization; pyrite oxidation; ferric chloride; ferric sulphate; Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans; Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons