SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número3Gestión del cuidado de enfermería en las unidades de cuidados de emergenciaRelación entre la estratificación del riesgo, la mortalidad y el tiempo de permanencia en un servicio de Urgencias índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Investigación y Educación en Enfermería

versión impresa ISSN 0120-5307

Resumen

GONTIJO GOMES, Cássia Regina; RESENDE IZIDORO, Lívia Cristina  y  FERREIRA DA MATA, Luciana Regina. Risk factors for prostate cancer, and motivational and hindering aspects in conducting preventive practices. Invest. educ. enferm [online]. 2015, vol.33, n.3, pp.415-423. ISSN 0120-5307.  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v33n3a04.

Objective.Identify risk factors for Prostate Cancer (PC), preventive practices, and hindering and motivating factors for disease prevention among workers of a public university. Methodology. A descriptive study, conducted with 92 workers who answered a self-administered questionnaire on the variables related to sociodemographic characteristics and clinical risk factors, sources of information about PC, practices related to prevention, and information on the hindering and motivating factors for prevention of the disease. Results. Most (95.0%) participants had one or more risk factors for PC; 68.5% underwent completion of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test annually at the request of the university; 50.0% of participants never performed the digital rectal examination (DRE); the main source of information was the media (64.1%); the main complicating factor for realization of the yearly preventive screening test was the lack of request for examination by their doctor; and the main motivating reason was recognition of the severity of the disease. Conclusion. Most participants had risk factors for the disease, do not perform the DRE, presented difficulties in carrying out prevention, and revealed they do not receive information about the disease from healthcare professionals, which could in turn lead to an erroneous understanding, resulting in hindering factors for practices to prevent PC. Thus, health care managers and multidisciplinary teams should engage in preventive health care for men in order to initiate preventive practices, and clarify any doubts about the disease.

Palabras clave : prostatic neoplasms; prevention and control; workers.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Inglés | Portugués     · Inglés ( pdf )