SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número1COMPARACIÓN DE LA RESISTENCIA DE TRES SISTEMAS CERÁMICOS EN TRAMOS PROTÉSICOS FIJOS ANTERIORES. ANÁLISIS POR ELEMENTOS FINITOSINFLUENCIA DEL TIEMPO POSBLANQUEAMIENTO SOBRE LA ADHESIÓN DE UNA RESINA COMPUESTA AL ESMALTE DENTAL índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia

versión impresa ISSN 0121-246X

Resumen

BONILLA LONDONO, Margarita María; BARRERA CHAPARRO, Judith Patricia; ARROYAVE GODOY, Angela Ptricia  y  DIAZ ROA, Mónica Eliana. REPRODUCIBILITY OF SOFT TISSUE CEPHALOMETRIC LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION BY CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL DIRECT RADIOGRAPHY. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq [online]. 2013, vol.25, n.1, pp.76-91. ISSN 0121-246X.

INTRODUCTION: there is little information on the reproducibility of soft tissue cephalometric points; the purpose of this study was then to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of soft tissue cephalometric landmark identification in direct digital radiography and conventional radiography. METHODS: 11 pairs of conventional and direct digital radiographs were introduced in the Cephapoint program. 10 cephalometric points were located on a Cartesian plane (X and Y) in conventional and digital images. The measurements were taken twice by 3 operators with 1 week interval. Interobserver average error was calculated in order to assess reproducibility in each point, and intraobserver error was used to determine accuracy. RESULTS: interobserver error in soft tissue cephalometric points was less than 1 mm for most points in both images, except in chin and pogonion, with no statistically significant differences. Statistically significant differences were found between the variances in the X axis, with less variability in the case of digital radiography in these points: labrale superius (p = 0.043), subnasale (p = 0, 013), columella (p = 0.038), stomion superius (p = 0.029), and stomion inferius (p = 0.015). The Y axis did not show statistically significant differences between the two methods. The assessment of intraobserver reproducibility showed an excellent Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (0.935) in both methods.. CONCLUSION: According to the findings of this study, the evaluated radiographs and methods offer similar diagnostic accuracy.

Palabras clave : cephalometry; results reproducibility; radiography; double-photon emission radiographic image.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español | Inglés     · Español ( pdf )