SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 número1EVALUACIÓN CLÍNICA Y RADIOGRÁFICA DE IMPLANTES REHABILITADOS CON SOBREDENTADURAS MANDIBULARES Y SOMETIDOS A CARGA INMEDIATA. 36 MESES DE OBSERVACIÓNDESIGUALDADES EN LOS INDICADORES DE EXPERIENCIA DE CARIES DENTAL EN LA PRIMERA INFANCIA EN EL MUNICIPIO DE ANDES (ANTIOQUIA, COLOMBIA) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia

versión impresa ISSN 0121-246X

Resumen

MONTENEGRO-MONCAYO, Óscar Andrés; MOSQUERA-HURTADO, Jenny Adriana; GONZALEZ-COLMENARES, Gretel  y  THOMAS-ALVARADO, Yeily Isabel. DIFFERENTIAL IN VITRO FORCE DEGRADATION OF INTERMAXILLARY LATEX AND NON-LATEX ELASTICS. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq [online]. 2018, vol.30, n.1, pp.24-31. ISSN 0121-246X.  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v30n1a3.

Introduction:

Various in vitro studies report that latex and non-latex elastics lose some of their initial force after they have been placed in the oral cavity. However, several differences occur within one single manufacturer, which could be of importance in selecting elastics. The aim of the present study was to conduct an in vitro evaluation of force loss in latex and non-latex elastics of a same manufacturer, activated in conditions simulating the oral cavity.

Methods:

we used 40 intermaxillary latex (n = 20) and non-latex (n = 20) ¼" 6 oz (170.10 g) elastics, stretched to 18 mm and immersed in artificial saliva for 24 hours. Force-displacement was measured using a test dynamometer, calculating the percentage of force relaxation (%R) at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the groups.

Results:

latex elastics significantly offered greater force than non-latex elastics during all evaluations (p < 0.05). The %R in latex elastics at 24 hours was 8.7% and 9.2% in non-latex elastics. The largest force loss in both materials occurred during the first six hours. The difference in %R between the two materials was statistically significant between 0 and 6 hours.

Conclusions:

the latex and non-latex elastics used in this study can be equally used in clinical practice. However, the use of both elastics must be kept under strict control to achieve efficient orthodontic mechanics, since the period of greatest instability occurred between 0 and 6 hours.

Palabras clave : orthodontics; latex; orthodontic appliances; modulus of elasticity.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )