SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 número58Estimación del potencial de disipación de energía del oleaje de estructuras sumergidas y flotantesControl, supervisión y representación matemática de un proceso de biodigestión anaerobia para la biomasa de contenido ruminal bovino índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Tecnura

versión impresa ISSN 0123-921X

Resumen

MARTINEZ, Nora Dolores et al. Definition of the uncertainty of the aflatoxin analysis method by HPLC in raisins. Tecnura [online]. 2018, vol.22, n.58, pp.25-36. ISSN 0123-921X.  https://doi.org/10.14483/22487638.12896.

Objective:

This work presents the definition of uncertainties for the methods of analysis of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1 and G2 in raisins by HPLC-FLD. The uncertainty of a method is one of the parameters required by the norm IRAM 301-ISO/IEC 17025:2005Standard, applicable in the Argentine Republic and accredited by the Argentine Accreditation Organism (OAA), and forms part of the validation of analytical methods. In addition, it is a necessary requirement to expand the scope of accreditation of the Laboratory of Analysis of Regional Products of Chemical Engineering (LAPRIQ, by the name in Spanish), belonging to the Institute of Chemical Engineering of the National University of San Juan.

Methodology:

The procedure used is called “Bottom up”, based on a succession of calculation that take into account errors from each of the analytical operations decomposed in primary activities. For the initial stage, sources of error that can affect the result of the analysis were identified. The Ishikawa's fishbone procedure was used as a basis for determining the sources of error and their incidence in the final uncertainty of the process. Once the factors that add up to the error in the measurement were defined, all the HPLC calibration tests were performed. Second, the combined uncertainties were added, weighted according to the importance of their contribution through the sensitivity coefficient. Finally, the expanded uncertainty was determined using a coverage factor K = 2, which implies a confidence percentage of 95%. With this factor we can expect to include the largest fraction of the distribution of the values attributed to the measurand.

Results:

Six sources of error were detected and correspond, on the one hand, to the mass measurements of the sample, extraction volumes, elution, and aliquot for “clean up” and, on the other, HPLC detection and recovery rate of the method. The calculated uncertainties for the four aflatoxins are AFB1= 0.7 mg/kg, AFB2= 0.2 mg/kg, AFG1 = 0.9 mg/kg y AFG2 = 0.3 mg/kg.

Conclusions:

The values of the expanded uncertainties are reported in the certificate of analysis, along with the result of the HPLC test, as one of the tests of the validation of the method validation.

Palabras clave : aflatoxins; HPLC; combined uncertainty; standard uncertainty; expanded uncertainty.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )