SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 número65Estado del agua del río Cesar por vertimientos residuales de la ciudad de Valledupar. Bioindicación por índice BMWP/ColEfectos de las crecidas en el transporte de material particulado y carbono orgánico. Caso del río Oka (País Vasco, España) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Tecnura

versión impresa ISSN 0123-921X

Resumen

DIAZ CHAVEZ, Luis; ESPINOSA ROMERO, Ana Patricia  y  MOLINA BOLIVAR, Geomar. Environmental health of the Ranchería river through aquatic macroinvertebrates in the area of influence of the El Cerrejón carboniferous complex. Tecnura [online]. 2020, vol.24, n.65, pp.49-63.  Epub 05-Nov-2020. ISSN 0123-921X.  https://doi.org/10.14483/22487638.15773.

Objective:

This research aimed to evaluate the environmental health of the lunatic ecosystem River Ranchería in the area of influence of the El Cerrejón coal complex, through bioindication with aquatic macroinvertebrates.

Methodology:

Three monitoring stations were established (E1, E2 y E3), in which measurements of physicochemical variables were made such as: Temperature (°C), Dissolved Oxigen (mg/L), pH, Salinity (%o), Conductividad (µS/cm), Turbidity (UNT), Total Suspended Solids (mg/L), Chlorides (mg/L), Amonios (µg/L), Nitrites (µg/L), Nitrates (µg/L), Phosphates (µg/L) and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/L). Aquatic macroinvertebrates were collected through multi-habitat sampling with surber net, D-net and PVC nucleators for collection of benthic organisms. Water quality at each monitoring station was classified using the BMWP/col index.

Results:

As relevant results, it was found that the families of aquatic macroinvertebrates with the most abundance in E1 were Baetidae, Coenagrionidae, Philopomamidae, Leptohyphidae and Leptophlebiidae; in E2, Culicidae, Hydrophilidae, Coenagrionidae, Psephenidae e Hydrobiidae and in E3, Coenagrionidae, Hydrobiidae, Belastomatidae and Palaemonidae.

Conclusions:

It is concluded that E1 has good quality waters (BMWP/col 130; ASPT 6.50), with high diversity and richness (H'E1 x 3.75 bits/ind; IE1 x 4.76); E2 and E3 have waters of acceptable quality (BMWP/ col x 65; ASPT 5.00) and dubious quality (BMWP/ col x 50; ASPT-5.25), respectively, with median diversity of families (H'E2 x 2.97 bits/ind and H'E3 x 2.32 bits/ind) and median wealth (IE2 x 2.82 and IE3 x 1.88).

Financing:

Universidad de La Guajira.

Palabras clave : Water quality; bioindicators; BMWP/col.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )