SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número23Las teorías descriptivas de la referencia de Strawson y Searle: Dos críticas a las teorías del sinsentidoLa filosofía analítica y el derecho penal índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Discusiones Filosóficas

versión impresa ISSN 0124-6127

Resumen

CARDENAS CASTANEDA, Leonardo. Quine's Naturalized Epistemology vs. The indeterminacy of translation: A structuralistic approach. discus.filos [online]. 2013, vol.14, n.23, pp.179-194. ISSN 0124-6127.

This paper intends to show that Quine's theory of the indeterminacy of translation is incompatible with any attempt at naturalizing epistemology, because if we accept that one of the implications of the indeterminacy of translation is the elimination of intensional discourse, then it would not be possible to develop objective standards that serve as indicators of progress and genuine scientific knowledge. In addition, I will draw on the structuralist distinction between theoretical-terms and non-theoretical-terms, in order to criticize the behaviorism to which Quinean naturalism can lead. The point in this part of the work is that this distinction is important for a scientific theory can make predictions in a satisfactory way.

Palabras clave : Behaviorism; naturalized epistemology; metatheoretical structuralism; indeterminacy of translation.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )