SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número41PLURALISMO O MONISMO LÓGICO, RELATIVISMO O DETERMINISMO LINGÜÍSTICO: ¿CÓMO LA LÓGICA y EL LENGUAJE INFLUENCIAN NUESTRO RAZONAMIENTO? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Eidos

versión impresa ISSN 1692-8857versión On-line ISSN 2011-7477

Resumen

PINO ROJAS, Bernardo Antonio. PRIMITIVE CONCEPTS AND THE ONTOLOGICAL QUESTION. Eidos [online]. 2024, n.41, pp.230-267.  Epub 15-Mayo-2024. ISSN 1692-8857.

Drawing upon a distinction between epistemically and metaphysically motivated notions of a concept, I consider the insurmountable problems of theories that appeal to our epistemic capacities to address the problem of the nature of concepts satisfactorily. Prominent theories of concepts hold that primitive concepts must have internal structure if they are to account for the explanatory functions that cognitive scientists have attributed to such constructs as prototypes, exemplars, and theories. Vindicating the role of non-experimental philosophy in the critical examination of empirical theories, I argue that the explanatory effectiveness of those constructs is orthogonal to an argument concerning the structure of primitive concepts. Conceptual atomism provides an alternative approach to individuating primitive concepts the precise formulation of which has yet to be worked out. Despite its unpopularity, the atomist alternative is still in a better position to face the question of what concepts are than its competitors.

Palabras clave : concepts; mental representations; bodies of knowledge; ontology; philosophy; cognitive science.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )