SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.63 número3Criminalidad en contexto COVID año 2020 y aproximación de una propuesta en neurocriminologíaAgresores sexuales seriales en Colombia: dos estudios de casos de las ciudades de Bogotá y Cali índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Criminalidad

versión impresa ISSN 1794-3108

Resumen

ARENAS-GARCIA, Lorea. Constructing and validating an instrument for comparing national criminal justice policies. Rev. Crim. [online]. 2021, vol.63, n.3, pp.107-125.  Epub 15-Abr-2021. ISSN 1794-3108.  https://doi.org/10.47741/17943108.313.

The social exclusion generated by criminal justice policies adopted by some countries regarding certain individuals (offenders, ex-offenders, defendants, or suspects) places these individuals in worse individual and social conditions pursuant to their contact with penal institutions. Measuring social exclusion is useful for comparing different national crime control systems and for estimating how exclusionary a country is. However, traditional comparisons of criminal justice policies have focused on the level of punitiveness exerted by each national criminal justice system referring to the incarceration rate per 100.000 inhabitants. As pointed out by Díez-Ripollés y García-España (2019), constituting all comparisons around one indicator marginalises others with stronger measurement capacity. For this reason, an instrument of 39 indicators was created by the authors using expert judgments (Díez-Ripollés & García-España, 2019). This article discusses the development of the tool in detail and how its validity and reliability were established. To validate the instrument, we surveyed 99 international experts and applied Aiken V as the main statistical procedure. Our findings suggest this instrument is valid and reliable for international comparison.

Palabras clave : Criminal justice; law enforcement; Comparative analysis; research methods; indicators; questionnaires..

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )