SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número4Variaciones anómalas en potenciales geoeléctricos observadas a lo largo de un gasoducto en Argentina y su posible intensificación debido a variaciones del campo magnético terrestreClasificación de sitio de la Red de Acelerógrafos de Costa Rica basada en mediciones de VS30 y en el período fundamental índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Earth Sciences Research Journal

versión impresa ISSN 1794-6190

Resumen

KONAKOGLU, Berkant  y  AKAR, Alper. Geoid undulation prediction using ANNs (RBFNN and GRNN), multiple linear regression (MLR), and interpolation methods: A comparative study. Earth Sci. Res. J. [online]. 2021, vol.25, n.4, pp.371-382.  Epub 04-Mar-2022. ISSN 1794-6190.  https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v25n4.91195.

This study evaluated different methods for geoid undulation prediction and included two types of artificial neural networks (ANNs) - the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and the generalized regression neural network (GRNN) - as well as conventional methods including multiple linear regression (MLR) and ten different interpolation techniques. In this work, k-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the model and its behavior on the independent dataset. With this validation method, each of a k number of groups has the chance to be divided into training and testing data. The performances of the methods were evaluated in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), correlation coefficient (R2), and using graphical indicators. The evaluation of the performance of the datasets obtained using cross-validation was performed in two ways. When the method having the minimum error result was accepted as the most appropriate method, the natural neighbor (NN) gave better results than the other methods (RMSE = 0.142 m, MAE = 0.097 m, NSE = 0.98986, and R2 = 0.99011). On the other hand, it was observed that on average, the GRNN exhibited the best performance (RMSE = 0.185 m, MAE = 0.137 m, NSE = 0.98229, and R2 = 0.98249).

Palabras clave : Generalized regression neural network (GRNN); Radial basis function neural network (RBFNN); Multiple linear regression (MLR); Interpolation methods; Geoid determination.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )