SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número2LAICISMO Y LIBERALISMO COMO PARADIGMAS DE INTERPRETACIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS: REFLEXIONES SOBRE LA CONFIGURACIÓN DE LA LIBERTAD RELIGIOSA A LA LUZ DEL DEBATE FRANCÉS SOBRE EL VELO ISLÁMICO índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Díkaion

versión impresa ISSN 0120-8942

Resumen

OLIVEIRA DE SOUSA, FELIPE. THE OBJECTIVITY OF BELIEFS, REASONABLE DISAGREEMENT AND POLITICAL DELIBERATION. Díkaion [online]. 2011, vol.20, n.2, pp.213-236. ISSN 0120-8942.

This paper is part of a broader argument that seeks to offer a justification for political (and law's) authority. The aims here are two-fold: to investigate the role of truth in political argument and to place the problem of reasonable disagreement. More precisely, the argument focuses on the possibility of political deliberation. Political deliberation figures as a preliminary stage of political decision-making. It has to do with a confrontation between various incompatible substantive beliefs which, in despite of this, seem to be all reasonable. How can citizens holding incompatible beliefs engage in a common enterprise of justifying them to one another? That is the main question.

Palabras clave : Beliefs; objectivity; truth; reasonable disagreement; political deliberation.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )