SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 número105INFLUENCIA DE ALGUNOS ASPECTOS DE LA FILOSOFÍA POLÍTICA DE ARISTÓTELES EN LA PRIMA CLEMENTISLA PRAXIS DE LA ENCARNACION EN EL PENSAMIENTO DE SIMONE WEIL índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Cuestiones Teológicas

versión impresa ISSN 0120-131X

Resumen

MIRANDA-ROJAS, Rafael. SKEPTICAL THEISM, FREE WILL SKEPTICISM AND ATHEISM: PONDERING THE SCOPE OF MORAL PARALYSIS. Cuest. teol. [online]. 2019, vol.46, n.105, pp.149-164. ISSN 0120-131X.  https://doi.org/10.18566/cueteo.v46n105.a06.

In this paper, I aim to show that Skeptical Theism (ST) implies the rejection of Free Will Skepticism (FWS). This is so because ST holds the so-called evidential argument from evil against theism. This argument presupposes free will (as a hidden premise), conducting this way to a skeptical conclusion without questioning the plausibility of FWS in the first place. I argue that this kind of conflict between two skeptical scenarios removes the validity of ST and FWS: It is ad hoc to assume a skeptical scenario S1 (ST) that supports thesis T1, and implicitly rejects the consequences of another skeptical scenario S2 (FWS) that discards T1. This implies the rejection of the so-called Moral Paralysis (MP) and shows a tension between Moral Skepticism (MS), ST and FWS. Moreover, the links between skepticism, dogmatism and atheism, as a case of epistemic defeasibility, are discussed.

Palabras clave : Skeptical Theism; Free Will Skepticism; Evidential argument; Evil; Moral Paralysis.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )