SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 número1DNA damage assessment and biological monitoring of occupational exposure to organic solvents, 2006Efficacy of the amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine combination and of chloroquine for the treatment of malaria in Córdoba, Colombia, 2006 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Biomédica

versão impressa ISSN 0120-4157versão On-line ISSN 2590-7379

Resumo

ROMERO, Javier; SANABRIA, Álvaro; ANGARITA, Miguel  e  VARON, Juan Carlos. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Biomédica [online]. 2008, vol.28, n.1, pp.139-147. ISSN 0120-4157.

Introduction. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is difficult in nearly 30% of patients with pain in low right quadrant. Diagnostic imaging may provide a means of a more accurate diagnosis. Objective. The cost-effectiveness of diagnostic image tests was calculated for comparison with routine physical examination in patients with abdominal pain suspected to be appendicitis. Materials and methods.  A cost-effectiveness protocol was designed, using a decision analysis model. The standard case  was a patient with abdominal pain in right lower quadrant and suspicion of appendicitis. Three independent diagnostic alternatives were selected-ultrasonography, abdominal tomography and physical exam  in hospital with the subject under observation less than six hours. Operative characteristics, study design and costs of interventions and outcomes were assessed. The main outcome consisted of a confirmed diagnosis of appendicitis. The point of view taken was that of health maintenance organizations. Direct and indirect medical costs were measured. Time horizon used was three months. A one way sensitivity analysis was made. Results. For a prepaid system, the most cost-effective strategy was abdominal tomography, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of US$965/diagnosed patient. For public system, the most cost-effective strategy was abdominal tomography, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of US$492/diagnosed patient. Conclusions. Imaging diagnostic methods, in cases of abdominal pain suspected to be appendicitis, are more cost-effective than physical exam to make accurate diagnostic decisions. Tomography offers the best cost-effectiveness in prepaid system and in public health system.

Palavras-chave : appendicitis [diagnosis]; cost-benefit analysis; tomography; ultrasonography; physical examination; decision support techniques.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons