SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número41Pluralism and Logical Monism, Relativism and Linguistic Determinism: How do Logic and Language Influence our thinking? índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Eidos

versão impressa ISSN 1692-8857versão On-line ISSN 2011-7477

Resumo

PINO ROJAS, Bernardo Antonio. PRIMITIVE CONCEPTS AND THE ONTOLOGICAL QUESTION. Eidos [online]. 2024, n.41, pp.230-267.  Epub 15-Maio-2024. ISSN 1692-8857.

Drawing upon a distinction between epistemically and metaphysically motivated notions of a concept, I consider the insurmountable problems of theories that appeal to our epistemic capacities to address the problem of the nature of concepts satisfactorily. Prominent theories of concepts hold that primitive concepts must have internal structure if they are to account for the explanatory functions that cognitive scientists have attributed to such constructs as prototypes, exemplars, and theories. Vindicating the role of non-experimental philosophy in the critical examination of empirical theories, I argue that the explanatory effectiveness of those constructs is orthogonal to an argument concerning the structure of primitive concepts. Conceptual atomism provides an alternative approach to individuating primitive concepts the precise formulation of which has yet to be worked out. Despite its unpopularity, the atomist alternative is still in a better position to face the question of what concepts are than its competitors.

Palavras-chave : concepts; mental representations; bodies of knowledge; ontology; philosophy; cognitive science.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )