SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 número3Ferramentas ultrassonográficas para avaliação do baço em cães: Revisão da literaturaA água magnetizada melhora a produtividade e os parâmetros sanguíneos em gansos índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias

versão impressa ISSN 0120-0690

Resumo

ZABORSKI*, Daniel; PROSKURA, Witold S  e  GRZESIAK, Wilhelm. Comparison between data mining methods to assess calving difficulty in cattle. Rev Colom Cienc Pecua [online]. 2017, vol.30, n.3, pp.196-208. ISSN 0120-0690.  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v30n3a03.

Background:

Dystocia in cattle results in adverse consequences (increased calf morbidity and mortality, decreased fertility, and milk production, lower cow survival and reduced welfare) leading to considerable economic losses.

Objective:

To classify calvings in dairy cattle according to their difficulty using selected data mining methods (classification and regression trees (CART), chi-square automatic interaction detection trees (CHAID) and quick, unbiased, efficient, statistical trees (QUEST)), and to identify the most significant factors affecting calving difficulty. The results of data mining methods were compared with those of a more traditional generalized linear model (GLM).

Methods:

A total of 1,342 calving records of Polish Holstein- Friesian black-and-white heifers from four farms were used. Calving difficulty was divided into three categories (easy, moderate and difficult).

Results:

The percentages of calvings correctly classified by CART, CHAID, QUEST, and GLM were as follows: 35.14, 18.92, 19.82, and 43.24% (easy), 68.70, 73.91, 81.74, and 41.74%

(moderate), and 77.27, 85.45, 73.64, and 81.82% (difficult), respectively. The most important factors affecting calving difficulty were bull’s rank (based on the mean calving difficulty score of its daughters), calving age, farm category (based on its mean milk yield) and calving season.

Conclusion:

All classification models were satisfactory and could predict the class of calving difficulty.

Palavras-chave : classification; dairy heifers; decision support systems; dystocia; electronic learning.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )