SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 número2A circulação internacional de ideias sociológicas: o tortuoso caso de "The Iron Cage Revisited"Circuitos de alimentos alternativos: atores, dispositivos e vinculações em produtos lácteos comercializados no amba índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Colombiana de Sociología

versão impressa ISSN 0120-159X

Resumo

PARKER, Cristián; PEREZ, José Miguel  e  VARGAS, Paulina. Environmental Impact Assessment: Sociology and semiotics of discursive asymmetries. Case Study of Alto Maipo in Chile. Rev. colomb. soc. [online]. 2023, vol.46, n.2, pp.45-77.  Epub 10-Maio-2024. ISSN 0120-159X.  https://doi.org/10.15446/rcs.v46n1/99056.

In the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) processes, multiple actors are involved. Through their discourses, they show a series of differences in the way they conceive the environment. This article analyzes the discourses and semiotics, the contrasts and asymmetries, observed in the forms of knowledge and languages of the actors involved in EIA. The main hypothesis is that environmental knowledge, in the context of EIA, should be apprehended as a simultaneous and articulated deployment of complex semiotic structures that build differentiated and asymmetric forms of conceptions of the environment.

The article is the result of an empirical case study research of an emblematic hydroelectric project in Chile, using qualitative methodologies, and a discourse analysis. The results show that the institutional discourse is self-referential in juridical terms and the environmental impact is defined by a normative and not a substantive way. The businesspersons discourse, for its part, emphasizes the goal of socioeconomic development. Environmental officials focus on assessing and supervising, while scientists on protecting health and the environment. On the other hand, from restrictive codes, communities' and local actors' discourses asserts the goal of caring for the habitat and safeguarding the future of "our children".

We observe asymmetries in the form and content of speeches, and codes, not only about language and about information. Indeed the predominance of regulatory codes over tacit and holistic knowledge codes about the environment (in EIA) engenders biases that limit environmental evaluation and citizen participation.

The purpose of this work is to contribute to understand the construction of these discourses through the narrative of the main actors involved, considering the different semantic dimensions through a semiotic and a sociological analysis.

Descriptors:

Chile, environment, semiotics, sociology.

Palavras-chave : actors of environmental assessment; environmental assessment; environmental impact; environmental knowledge; knowledge asymmetries; semiotics of environmental assessment.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )