SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.49 número1Hemodynamic monitoring with two blood gases: "a tool that does not go out of style" índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Colombian Journal of Anestesiology

versão impressa ISSN 0120-3347versão On-line ISSN 2256-2087

Resumo

CHACON ACEVEDO, Kelly Rocío et al. Effectiveness and safety of the enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: overview of systematic reviews. Rev. colomb. anestesiol. [online]. 2021, vol.49, n.1, e400.  Epub 04-Jan-2021. ISSN 0120-3347.  https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e943.

Introduction

Multimodal enhanced recovery programs are a new paradigm in perioperative care.

Objective

To evaluate the certainty of evidence pertaining to the effectiveness and safety of the multimodal perioperative care program in elective colorectal surgery.

Data source: A search was conducted in the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, up until February 2020.

Eligibility criteria

Systematic reviews that take into account the perioperative multimodal program in patients with an indication for colorectal surgery were included. The primary outcomes were morbidity and postoperative deaths. The secondary outcome was hospital length of stay.

Study quality and synthesis method

The reviews were evaluated with AMSTAR-2 and the certainty of the evidence with the GRADE methodology. The findings are presented with measures of frequency, risk estimators, or differences.

Results

Six systematic reviews of clinical trials with medium and high quality in AMSTAR-2 were included. Morbidity was reduced between 16 and 48%. Studies are inconclusive regarding postoperative mortality. Hospital length of stay was reduced by an average of 2.5 days (p <0.05). The certainty of the body of evidence is very low.

Limitations

The effect of the program, depending on the combination of elements, is not clear.

Conclusions and implications

Despite the proven evidence that the program is effective in reducing global postoperative morbidity and hospital stay, the body of evidence is of very low quality. Consequently, results may change with new evidence and further research is required.

Palavras-chave : Colorectal surgery; perioperative care; enhanced recovery; systematic reviews; health technology assessment.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês | Espanhol     · Inglês ( pdf ) | Espanhol ( pdf )